Cargando…
Resting Full-Cycle Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve: A SWEDEHEART-Registry-Based Comparison of Two Physiological Indexes for Assessing Coronary Stenosis Severity
The adenosine-requiring physiological index fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold-standard method for determining the significance of intermediate lesions, while the resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) is a novel nonhyperaemic index without the need for adenosine administration. The aim of this study...
Autores principales: | Malmberg, Stephen, Lauermann, Jörg, Karlström, Patric, Gulin, Dario, Barmano, Neshro |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37427088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/6461691 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Utility of Saline-Induced Resting Full-Cycle Ratio Compared with Resting Full-Cycle Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve
por: Sato, Takao, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Feasibility and Comparison of Resting Full-Cycle Ratio and Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis
por: Wienemann, Hendrik, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Invasive physiologic assessment of coronary artery stenosis by resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve: a prospective observational study
por: Lee, Oh-Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparison of Resting Full-Cycle Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in a German Real-World Cohort
por: Wienemann, Hendrik, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Cohort profile: Data standards for cardiac rehabilitation structure and processes for the SWEDEHEART cardiac rehabilitation (SWEDEHEART-CR) registry
por: Leosdottir, Margret, et al.
Publicado: (2023)