Cargando…
Bias assessment of a test-negative design study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness used in national policymaking
National test-negative-case-control (TNCC) studies are used to monitor COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in the UK. A questionnaire was sent to participants from the first published TNCC COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness study conducted by the UK Health Security Agency, to assess for potential biases and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37414791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39674-0 |
_version_ | 1785069330258460672 |
---|---|
author | Graham, Sophie Tessier, Elise Stowe, Julia Bernal, Jamie Lopez Parker, Edward P. K. Nitsch, Dorothea Miller, Elizabeth Andrews, Nick Walker, Jemma L. McDonald, Helen I. |
author_facet | Graham, Sophie Tessier, Elise Stowe, Julia Bernal, Jamie Lopez Parker, Edward P. K. Nitsch, Dorothea Miller, Elizabeth Andrews, Nick Walker, Jemma L. McDonald, Helen I. |
author_sort | Graham, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | National test-negative-case-control (TNCC) studies are used to monitor COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in the UK. A questionnaire was sent to participants from the first published TNCC COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness study conducted by the UK Health Security Agency, to assess for potential biases and changes in behaviour related to vaccination. The original study included symptomatic adults aged ≥70 years testing for COVID-19 between 08/12/2020 and 21/02/2021. A questionnaire was sent to cases and controls tested from 1–21 February 2021. In this study, 8648 individuals responded to the questionnaire (36.5% response). Using information from the questionnaire to produce a combined estimate that accounted for all potential biases decreased the original vaccine effectiveness estimate after two doses of BNT162b2 from 88% (95% CI: 79–94%) to 85% (95% CI: 68–94%). Self-reported behaviour demonstrated minimal evidence of riskier behaviour after vaccination. These findings offer reassurance to policy makers and clinicians making decisions based on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness TNCC studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10325974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103259742023-07-08 Bias assessment of a test-negative design study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness used in national policymaking Graham, Sophie Tessier, Elise Stowe, Julia Bernal, Jamie Lopez Parker, Edward P. K. Nitsch, Dorothea Miller, Elizabeth Andrews, Nick Walker, Jemma L. McDonald, Helen I. Nat Commun Article National test-negative-case-control (TNCC) studies are used to monitor COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in the UK. A questionnaire was sent to participants from the first published TNCC COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness study conducted by the UK Health Security Agency, to assess for potential biases and changes in behaviour related to vaccination. The original study included symptomatic adults aged ≥70 years testing for COVID-19 between 08/12/2020 and 21/02/2021. A questionnaire was sent to cases and controls tested from 1–21 February 2021. In this study, 8648 individuals responded to the questionnaire (36.5% response). Using information from the questionnaire to produce a combined estimate that accounted for all potential biases decreased the original vaccine effectiveness estimate after two doses of BNT162b2 from 88% (95% CI: 79–94%) to 85% (95% CI: 68–94%). Self-reported behaviour demonstrated minimal evidence of riskier behaviour after vaccination. These findings offer reassurance to policy makers and clinicians making decisions based on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness TNCC studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10325974/ /pubmed/37414791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39674-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Graham, Sophie Tessier, Elise Stowe, Julia Bernal, Jamie Lopez Parker, Edward P. K. Nitsch, Dorothea Miller, Elizabeth Andrews, Nick Walker, Jemma L. McDonald, Helen I. Bias assessment of a test-negative design study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness used in national policymaking |
title | Bias assessment of a test-negative design study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness used in national policymaking |
title_full | Bias assessment of a test-negative design study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness used in national policymaking |
title_fullStr | Bias assessment of a test-negative design study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness used in national policymaking |
title_full_unstemmed | Bias assessment of a test-negative design study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness used in national policymaking |
title_short | Bias assessment of a test-negative design study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness used in national policymaking |
title_sort | bias assessment of a test-negative design study of covid-19 vaccine effectiveness used in national policymaking |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10325974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37414791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39674-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grahamsophie biasassessmentofatestnegativedesignstudyofcovid19vaccineeffectivenessusedinnationalpolicymaking AT tessierelise biasassessmentofatestnegativedesignstudyofcovid19vaccineeffectivenessusedinnationalpolicymaking AT stowejulia biasassessmentofatestnegativedesignstudyofcovid19vaccineeffectivenessusedinnationalpolicymaking AT bernaljamielopez biasassessmentofatestnegativedesignstudyofcovid19vaccineeffectivenessusedinnationalpolicymaking AT parkeredwardpk biasassessmentofatestnegativedesignstudyofcovid19vaccineeffectivenessusedinnationalpolicymaking AT nitschdorothea biasassessmentofatestnegativedesignstudyofcovid19vaccineeffectivenessusedinnationalpolicymaking AT millerelizabeth biasassessmentofatestnegativedesignstudyofcovid19vaccineeffectivenessusedinnationalpolicymaking AT andrewsnick biasassessmentofatestnegativedesignstudyofcovid19vaccineeffectivenessusedinnationalpolicymaking AT walkerjemmal biasassessmentofatestnegativedesignstudyofcovid19vaccineeffectivenessusedinnationalpolicymaking AT mcdonaldheleni biasassessmentofatestnegativedesignstudyofcovid19vaccineeffectivenessusedinnationalpolicymaking |