Cargando…
Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization?
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate MRI diagnostic performance in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in peripheral-zone PI-RADS 4 lesions, comparing those with clearly restricted diffusion (DWI-score 4), and those with equivocal diffusion pattern (DWI-score 3) and positive dynamic contrast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37045981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09605-0 |
_version_ | 1785069357207912448 |
---|---|
author | Messina, Emanuele Pecoraro, Martina Laschena, Ludovica Bicchetti, Marco Proietti, Flavia Ciardi, Antonio Leonardo, Costantino Sciarra, Alessandro Girometti, Rossano Catalano, Carlo Panebianco, Valeria |
author_facet | Messina, Emanuele Pecoraro, Martina Laschena, Ludovica Bicchetti, Marco Proietti, Flavia Ciardi, Antonio Leonardo, Costantino Sciarra, Alessandro Girometti, Rossano Catalano, Carlo Panebianco, Valeria |
author_sort | Messina, Emanuele |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate MRI diagnostic performance in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in peripheral-zone PI-RADS 4 lesions, comparing those with clearly restricted diffusion (DWI-score 4), and those with equivocal diffusion pattern (DWI-score 3) and positive dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. METHODS: This observational prospective study enrolled 389 men referred to MRI and, if positive (PI-RADS 3 with PSA-density [PSAD] ≥ 0.15 ng/mL/mL, 4 and 5), to MRI-directed biopsy. Lesions with DWI-score 3 and positive DCE were classified as “PI-RADS 3up,” instead of PI-RADS 4. Univariable and multivariable analyses were implemented to determine features correlated to csPCa detection. RESULTS: Prevalence of csPCa was 14.5% and 53.3% in PI-RADS categories 3up and 4, respectively (p < 0.001). MRI showed a sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity 40.9%, PPV 46.5%, NPV 100.0%, and accuracy 60.9% for csPCa detection. Modifying the threshold to consider MRI positive and to indicate biopsy (same as previously described, but PI-RADS 3up only when associated with elevated PSAD), the sensitivity changed to 93.9%, specificity 57.2%, PPV 53.0%, NPV 94.8%, and accuracy 69.7%. Age (p < 0.001), PSAD (p < 0.001), positive DWI (p < 0.001), and PI-RADS score (p = 0.04) resulted in independent predictors of csPCa. CONCLUSIONS: Most cases of PI-RADS 3up were false-positives, suggesting that upgrading peripheral lesions with DWI-score 3 to PI-RADS 4 because of positive DCE has a detrimental effect on MRI accuracy, decreasing the true prevalence of csPCa in the PI-RADS 4 category. PI-RADS 3up should not be upgraded and directed to biopsy only if associated with increased PSAD. KEY POINTS: • As per PI-RADS v2.1 recommendations, in case of a peripheral zone lesion with equivocal diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI score 3), but positive dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, the overall PI-RADS score should be upgraded to 4. • The current PI-RADS recommendation of upgrading PI-RADS 3 lesions of the peripheral zone to PI-RADS 4 because of positive DCE decreased clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate in our series. • According to our results, the most accurate threshold for setting indication to prostate biopsy is PI-RADS 3 or PI-RADS 3 with positive DCE both associated with increased PSA density. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-023-09605-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10326099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103260992023-07-08 Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization? Messina, Emanuele Pecoraro, Martina Laschena, Ludovica Bicchetti, Marco Proietti, Flavia Ciardi, Antonio Leonardo, Costantino Sciarra, Alessandro Girometti, Rossano Catalano, Carlo Panebianco, Valeria Eur Radiol Urogenital OBJECTIVES: To evaluate MRI diagnostic performance in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in peripheral-zone PI-RADS 4 lesions, comparing those with clearly restricted diffusion (DWI-score 4), and those with equivocal diffusion pattern (DWI-score 3) and positive dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. METHODS: This observational prospective study enrolled 389 men referred to MRI and, if positive (PI-RADS 3 with PSA-density [PSAD] ≥ 0.15 ng/mL/mL, 4 and 5), to MRI-directed biopsy. Lesions with DWI-score 3 and positive DCE were classified as “PI-RADS 3up,” instead of PI-RADS 4. Univariable and multivariable analyses were implemented to determine features correlated to csPCa detection. RESULTS: Prevalence of csPCa was 14.5% and 53.3% in PI-RADS categories 3up and 4, respectively (p < 0.001). MRI showed a sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity 40.9%, PPV 46.5%, NPV 100.0%, and accuracy 60.9% for csPCa detection. Modifying the threshold to consider MRI positive and to indicate biopsy (same as previously described, but PI-RADS 3up only when associated with elevated PSAD), the sensitivity changed to 93.9%, specificity 57.2%, PPV 53.0%, NPV 94.8%, and accuracy 69.7%. Age (p < 0.001), PSAD (p < 0.001), positive DWI (p < 0.001), and PI-RADS score (p = 0.04) resulted in independent predictors of csPCa. CONCLUSIONS: Most cases of PI-RADS 3up were false-positives, suggesting that upgrading peripheral lesions with DWI-score 3 to PI-RADS 4 because of positive DCE has a detrimental effect on MRI accuracy, decreasing the true prevalence of csPCa in the PI-RADS 4 category. PI-RADS 3up should not be upgraded and directed to biopsy only if associated with increased PSAD. KEY POINTS: • As per PI-RADS v2.1 recommendations, in case of a peripheral zone lesion with equivocal diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI score 3), but positive dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, the overall PI-RADS score should be upgraded to 4. • The current PI-RADS recommendation of upgrading PI-RADS 3 lesions of the peripheral zone to PI-RADS 4 because of positive DCE decreased clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate in our series. • According to our results, the most accurate threshold for setting indication to prostate biopsy is PI-RADS 3 or PI-RADS 3 with positive DCE both associated with increased PSA density. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-023-09605-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10326099/ /pubmed/37045981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09605-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Urogenital Messina, Emanuele Pecoraro, Martina Laschena, Ludovica Bicchetti, Marco Proietti, Flavia Ciardi, Antonio Leonardo, Costantino Sciarra, Alessandro Girometti, Rossano Catalano, Carlo Panebianco, Valeria Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization? |
title | Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization? |
title_full | Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization? |
title_fullStr | Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization? |
title_full_unstemmed | Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization? |
title_short | Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization? |
title_sort | low cancer yield in pi-rads 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced mri: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization? |
topic | Urogenital |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37045981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09605-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT messinaemanuele lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization AT pecoraromartina lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization AT laschenaludovica lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization AT bicchettimarco lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization AT proiettiflavia lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization AT ciardiantonio lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization AT leonardocostantino lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization AT sciarraalessandro lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization AT giromettirossano lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization AT catalanocarlo lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization AT panebiancovaleria lowcanceryieldinpirads3upgradedto4bydynamiccontrastenhancedmriisittimetoreconsiderscoringcategorization |