Cargando…
The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care
BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic dysfunction is well documented in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been used to facilitate weaning by strengthening the inspiratory muscles, yet the optimal approach remains uncertain. Whilst some data on the metabolic respons...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6 |
_version_ | 1785069376731348992 |
---|---|
author | Jenkins, Timothy O. MacBean, Vicky Poulsen, Mathias Krogh Karbing, Dan Stieper Rees, Stephen Edward Patel, Brijesh V. Polkey, Michael I. |
author_facet | Jenkins, Timothy O. MacBean, Vicky Poulsen, Mathias Krogh Karbing, Dan Stieper Rees, Stephen Edward Patel, Brijesh V. Polkey, Michael I. |
author_sort | Jenkins, Timothy O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic dysfunction is well documented in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been used to facilitate weaning by strengthening the inspiratory muscles, yet the optimal approach remains uncertain. Whilst some data on the metabolic response to whole body exercise in critical care exist, the metabolic response to IMT in critical care is yet to be investigated. This study aimed to quantify the metabolic response to IMT in critical care and its relationship to physiological variables. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on mechanically ventilated patients ventilated for ≥ 72 h and able to participate in IMT in a medical, surgical, and cardiothoracic intensive care unit. 76 measurements were taken on 26 patients performing IMT using an inspiratory threshold loading device at 4 cmH(2)O, and at 30, 50 and 80% of their negative inspiratory force (NIF). Oxygen consumption (VO(2)) was measured continuously using indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: First session mean (SD) VO(2) was 276 (86) ml/min at baseline, significantly increasing to 321 (93) ml/min, 333 (92) ml/min, 351(101) ml/min and 388 (98) ml/min after IMT at 4 cmH(2)O and 30, 50 and 80% NIF, respectively (p = 0.003). Post hoc comparisons revealed significant differences in VO(2) between baseline and 50% NIF and baseline and 80% NIF (p = 0.048 and p = 0.001, respectively). VO(2) increased by 9.3 ml/min for every 1 cmH(2)O increase in inspiratory load from IMT. Every increase in P/F ratio of 1 decreased the intercept VO(2) by 0.41 ml/min (CI − 0.58 to − 0.24 p < 0.001). NIF had a significant effect on the intercept and slope, with every 1 cmH(2)O increase in NIF increasing intercept VO(2) by 3.28 ml/min (CI 1.98–4.59 p < 0.001) and decreasing the dose–response slope by 0.15 ml/min/cmH(2)O (CI − 0.24 to − 0.05 p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: IMT causes a significant load-dependent increase in VO(2). P/F ratio and NIF impact baseline VO(2). The dose–response relationship of the applied respiratory load during IMT is modulated by respiratory strength. These data may offer a novel approach to prescription of IMT. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: The optimal approach to IMT in ICU is uncertain; we measured VO(2) at different applied respiratory loads to assess whether VO(2) increased proportionally with load and found VO(2) increased by 9.3 ml/min for every 1 cmH(2)O increase in inspiratory load from IMT. Baseline NIF has a significant effect on the intercept and slope, participants with a higher baseline NIF have a higher resting VO(2) but a less pronounced increase in VO(2) as the inspiratory load increases; this may offer a novel approach to IMT prescription. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT05101850. Registered on 28 September 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05101850 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10326210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103262102023-07-08 The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care Jenkins, Timothy O. MacBean, Vicky Poulsen, Mathias Krogh Karbing, Dan Stieper Rees, Stephen Edward Patel, Brijesh V. Polkey, Michael I. Intensive Care Med Exp Research Articles BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic dysfunction is well documented in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been used to facilitate weaning by strengthening the inspiratory muscles, yet the optimal approach remains uncertain. Whilst some data on the metabolic response to whole body exercise in critical care exist, the metabolic response to IMT in critical care is yet to be investigated. This study aimed to quantify the metabolic response to IMT in critical care and its relationship to physiological variables. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on mechanically ventilated patients ventilated for ≥ 72 h and able to participate in IMT in a medical, surgical, and cardiothoracic intensive care unit. 76 measurements were taken on 26 patients performing IMT using an inspiratory threshold loading device at 4 cmH(2)O, and at 30, 50 and 80% of their negative inspiratory force (NIF). Oxygen consumption (VO(2)) was measured continuously using indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: First session mean (SD) VO(2) was 276 (86) ml/min at baseline, significantly increasing to 321 (93) ml/min, 333 (92) ml/min, 351(101) ml/min and 388 (98) ml/min after IMT at 4 cmH(2)O and 30, 50 and 80% NIF, respectively (p = 0.003). Post hoc comparisons revealed significant differences in VO(2) between baseline and 50% NIF and baseline and 80% NIF (p = 0.048 and p = 0.001, respectively). VO(2) increased by 9.3 ml/min for every 1 cmH(2)O increase in inspiratory load from IMT. Every increase in P/F ratio of 1 decreased the intercept VO(2) by 0.41 ml/min (CI − 0.58 to − 0.24 p < 0.001). NIF had a significant effect on the intercept and slope, with every 1 cmH(2)O increase in NIF increasing intercept VO(2) by 3.28 ml/min (CI 1.98–4.59 p < 0.001) and decreasing the dose–response slope by 0.15 ml/min/cmH(2)O (CI − 0.24 to − 0.05 p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: IMT causes a significant load-dependent increase in VO(2). P/F ratio and NIF impact baseline VO(2). The dose–response relationship of the applied respiratory load during IMT is modulated by respiratory strength. These data may offer a novel approach to prescription of IMT. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: The optimal approach to IMT in ICU is uncertain; we measured VO(2) at different applied respiratory loads to assess whether VO(2) increased proportionally with load and found VO(2) increased by 9.3 ml/min for every 1 cmH(2)O increase in inspiratory load from IMT. Baseline NIF has a significant effect on the intercept and slope, participants with a higher baseline NIF have a higher resting VO(2) but a less pronounced increase in VO(2) as the inspiratory load increases; this may offer a novel approach to IMT prescription. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT05101850. Registered on 28 September 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05101850 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10326210/ /pubmed/37415048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Jenkins, Timothy O. MacBean, Vicky Poulsen, Mathias Krogh Karbing, Dan Stieper Rees, Stephen Edward Patel, Brijesh V. Polkey, Michael I. The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care |
title | The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care |
title_full | The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care |
title_fullStr | The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care |
title_full_unstemmed | The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care |
title_short | The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care |
title_sort | metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jenkinstimothyo themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT macbeanvicky themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT poulsenmathiaskrogh themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT karbingdanstieper themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT reesstephenedward themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT patelbrijeshv themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT polkeymichaeli themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT jenkinstimothyo metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT macbeanvicky metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT poulsenmathiaskrogh metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT karbingdanstieper metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT reesstephenedward metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT patelbrijeshv metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare AT polkeymichaeli metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare |