Cargando…

The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic dysfunction is well documented in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been used to facilitate weaning by strengthening the inspiratory muscles, yet the optimal approach remains uncertain. Whilst some data on the metabolic respons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenkins, Timothy O., MacBean, Vicky, Poulsen, Mathias Krogh, Karbing, Dan Stieper, Rees, Stephen Edward, Patel, Brijesh V., Polkey, Michael I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6
_version_ 1785069376731348992
author Jenkins, Timothy O.
MacBean, Vicky
Poulsen, Mathias Krogh
Karbing, Dan Stieper
Rees, Stephen Edward
Patel, Brijesh V.
Polkey, Michael I.
author_facet Jenkins, Timothy O.
MacBean, Vicky
Poulsen, Mathias Krogh
Karbing, Dan Stieper
Rees, Stephen Edward
Patel, Brijesh V.
Polkey, Michael I.
author_sort Jenkins, Timothy O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic dysfunction is well documented in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been used to facilitate weaning by strengthening the inspiratory muscles, yet the optimal approach remains uncertain. Whilst some data on the metabolic response to whole body exercise in critical care exist, the metabolic response to IMT in critical care is yet to be investigated. This study aimed to quantify the metabolic response to IMT in critical care and its relationship to physiological variables. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on mechanically ventilated patients ventilated for ≥ 72 h and able to participate in IMT in a medical, surgical, and cardiothoracic intensive care unit. 76 measurements were taken on 26 patients performing IMT using an inspiratory threshold loading device at 4 cmH(2)O, and at 30, 50 and 80% of their negative inspiratory force (NIF). Oxygen consumption (VO(2)) was measured continuously using indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: First session mean (SD) VO(2) was 276 (86) ml/min at baseline, significantly increasing to 321 (93) ml/min, 333 (92) ml/min, 351(101) ml/min and 388 (98) ml/min after IMT at 4 cmH(2)O and 30, 50 and 80% NIF, respectively (p = 0.003). Post hoc comparisons revealed significant differences in VO(2) between baseline and 50% NIF and baseline and 80% NIF (p = 0.048 and p = 0.001, respectively). VO(2) increased by 9.3 ml/min for every 1 cmH(2)O increase in inspiratory load from IMT. Every increase in P/F ratio of 1 decreased the intercept VO(2) by 0.41 ml/min (CI − 0.58 to − 0.24 p < 0.001). NIF had a significant effect on the intercept and slope, with every 1 cmH(2)O increase in NIF increasing intercept VO(2) by 3.28 ml/min (CI 1.98–4.59 p < 0.001) and decreasing the dose–response slope by 0.15 ml/min/cmH(2)O (CI − 0.24 to − 0.05 p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: IMT causes a significant load-dependent increase in VO(2). P/F ratio and NIF impact baseline VO(2). The dose–response relationship of the applied respiratory load during IMT is modulated by respiratory strength. These data may offer a novel approach to prescription of IMT. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: The optimal approach to IMT in ICU is uncertain; we measured VO(2) at different applied respiratory loads to assess whether VO(2) increased proportionally with load and found VO(2) increased by 9.3 ml/min for every 1 cmH(2)O increase in inspiratory load from IMT. Baseline NIF has a significant effect on the intercept and slope, participants with a higher baseline NIF have a higher resting VO(2) but a less pronounced increase in VO(2) as the inspiratory load increases; this may offer a novel approach to IMT prescription. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT05101850. Registered on 28 September 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05101850 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10326210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103262102023-07-08 The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care Jenkins, Timothy O. MacBean, Vicky Poulsen, Mathias Krogh Karbing, Dan Stieper Rees, Stephen Edward Patel, Brijesh V. Polkey, Michael I. Intensive Care Med Exp Research Articles BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic dysfunction is well documented in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been used to facilitate weaning by strengthening the inspiratory muscles, yet the optimal approach remains uncertain. Whilst some data on the metabolic response to whole body exercise in critical care exist, the metabolic response to IMT in critical care is yet to be investigated. This study aimed to quantify the metabolic response to IMT in critical care and its relationship to physiological variables. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on mechanically ventilated patients ventilated for ≥ 72 h and able to participate in IMT in a medical, surgical, and cardiothoracic intensive care unit. 76 measurements were taken on 26 patients performing IMT using an inspiratory threshold loading device at 4 cmH(2)O, and at 30, 50 and 80% of their negative inspiratory force (NIF). Oxygen consumption (VO(2)) was measured continuously using indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: First session mean (SD) VO(2) was 276 (86) ml/min at baseline, significantly increasing to 321 (93) ml/min, 333 (92) ml/min, 351(101) ml/min and 388 (98) ml/min after IMT at 4 cmH(2)O and 30, 50 and 80% NIF, respectively (p = 0.003). Post hoc comparisons revealed significant differences in VO(2) between baseline and 50% NIF and baseline and 80% NIF (p = 0.048 and p = 0.001, respectively). VO(2) increased by 9.3 ml/min for every 1 cmH(2)O increase in inspiratory load from IMT. Every increase in P/F ratio of 1 decreased the intercept VO(2) by 0.41 ml/min (CI − 0.58 to − 0.24 p < 0.001). NIF had a significant effect on the intercept and slope, with every 1 cmH(2)O increase in NIF increasing intercept VO(2) by 3.28 ml/min (CI 1.98–4.59 p < 0.001) and decreasing the dose–response slope by 0.15 ml/min/cmH(2)O (CI − 0.24 to − 0.05 p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: IMT causes a significant load-dependent increase in VO(2). P/F ratio and NIF impact baseline VO(2). The dose–response relationship of the applied respiratory load during IMT is modulated by respiratory strength. These data may offer a novel approach to prescription of IMT. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: The optimal approach to IMT in ICU is uncertain; we measured VO(2) at different applied respiratory loads to assess whether VO(2) increased proportionally with load and found VO(2) increased by 9.3 ml/min for every 1 cmH(2)O increase in inspiratory load from IMT. Baseline NIF has a significant effect on the intercept and slope, participants with a higher baseline NIF have a higher resting VO(2) but a less pronounced increase in VO(2) as the inspiratory load increases; this may offer a novel approach to IMT prescription. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT05101850. Registered on 28 September 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05101850 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10326210/ /pubmed/37415048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Articles
Jenkins, Timothy O.
MacBean, Vicky
Poulsen, Mathias Krogh
Karbing, Dan Stieper
Rees, Stephen Edward
Patel, Brijesh V.
Polkey, Michael I.
The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care
title The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care
title_full The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care
title_fullStr The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care
title_full_unstemmed The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care
title_short The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care
title_sort metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00522-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jenkinstimothyo themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT macbeanvicky themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT poulsenmathiaskrogh themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT karbingdanstieper themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT reesstephenedward themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT patelbrijeshv themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT polkeymichaeli themetaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT jenkinstimothyo metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT macbeanvicky metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT poulsenmathiaskrogh metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT karbingdanstieper metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT reesstephenedward metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT patelbrijeshv metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare
AT polkeymichaeli metaboliccostofinspiratorymuscletraininginmechanicallyventilatedpatientsincriticalcare