Cargando…
Differences among fathers, mothers, and teachers in symptom assessment of ADHD patients
BACKGROUND: The Swanson Nolan, and Pelham scale version IV (SNAP-IV) is the most critical tool for ADHD screening and diagnosis, which has two scoring methods. ADHD requires symptom assessment in multiple scenarios, and parent and teacher reports are indispensable for diagnosing ADHD. But the differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1029672 |
_version_ | 1785069390207647744 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Xia Li, Hui-Qin Simpson, Alan Xu, Jia-Jun Tang, Wan-Jie Li, Yuan-Yuan |
author_facet | Huang, Xia Li, Hui-Qin Simpson, Alan Xu, Jia-Jun Tang, Wan-Jie Li, Yuan-Yuan |
author_sort | Huang, Xia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Swanson Nolan, and Pelham scale version IV (SNAP-IV) is the most critical tool for ADHD screening and diagnosis, which has two scoring methods. ADHD requires symptom assessment in multiple scenarios, and parent and teacher reports are indispensable for diagnosing ADHD. But the differences of assessment results from fathers, mothers and teachers, and the consistency of results from different scoring methods are unknown. Therefore, we carried out this study to understand the differences in the scores of fathers, mothers and teachers using SNAP-IV for children with ADHD and to explore the differences in scoring results under different scoring methods. METHODS: The SNAP-IV scale and Demographics Questionnaire and Familiarity Index were used to survey fathers, mothers and head teachers. Measurement data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (x ± s). The enumeration data were described by frequency and percentage. ANOVA was used to compare group differences in mothers’, fathers’, and teachers’ mean SNAP-IV scores. The Bonferroni method was used for post hoc multiple comparison tests. Cochran’s Q test was used to compare the differences in the abnormal rate of SNAP-IV score results of mothers, fathers and teachers. Dunn’s test was used for post hoc multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: There were differences in scores among the three groups, and the differences showed inconsistent trends across the different subscales. Differences between groups were calculated again with familiarity as a control variable. The results showed the familiarity of parents and teachers with the patients did not affect the differences in their scores. The evaluation results were different under two assessment methods. CONCLUSION: Results concluded that fathers did not appear to be an appropriate candidate for evaluation. When using the SNAP-V for assessment, it should be comprehensively considered from both the scorer and symptom dimensions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10326278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103262782023-07-08 Differences among fathers, mothers, and teachers in symptom assessment of ADHD patients Huang, Xia Li, Hui-Qin Simpson, Alan Xu, Jia-Jun Tang, Wan-Jie Li, Yuan-Yuan Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: The Swanson Nolan, and Pelham scale version IV (SNAP-IV) is the most critical tool for ADHD screening and diagnosis, which has two scoring methods. ADHD requires symptom assessment in multiple scenarios, and parent and teacher reports are indispensable for diagnosing ADHD. But the differences of assessment results from fathers, mothers and teachers, and the consistency of results from different scoring methods are unknown. Therefore, we carried out this study to understand the differences in the scores of fathers, mothers and teachers using SNAP-IV for children with ADHD and to explore the differences in scoring results under different scoring methods. METHODS: The SNAP-IV scale and Demographics Questionnaire and Familiarity Index were used to survey fathers, mothers and head teachers. Measurement data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (x ± s). The enumeration data were described by frequency and percentage. ANOVA was used to compare group differences in mothers’, fathers’, and teachers’ mean SNAP-IV scores. The Bonferroni method was used for post hoc multiple comparison tests. Cochran’s Q test was used to compare the differences in the abnormal rate of SNAP-IV score results of mothers, fathers and teachers. Dunn’s test was used for post hoc multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: There were differences in scores among the three groups, and the differences showed inconsistent trends across the different subscales. Differences between groups were calculated again with familiarity as a control variable. The results showed the familiarity of parents and teachers with the patients did not affect the differences in their scores. The evaluation results were different under two assessment methods. CONCLUSION: Results concluded that fathers did not appear to be an appropriate candidate for evaluation. When using the SNAP-V for assessment, it should be comprehensively considered from both the scorer and symptom dimensions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10326278/ /pubmed/37426087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1029672 Text en Copyright © 2023 Huang, Li, Simpson, Xu, Tang and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Huang, Xia Li, Hui-Qin Simpson, Alan Xu, Jia-Jun Tang, Wan-Jie Li, Yuan-Yuan Differences among fathers, mothers, and teachers in symptom assessment of ADHD patients |
title | Differences among fathers, mothers, and teachers in symptom assessment of ADHD patients |
title_full | Differences among fathers, mothers, and teachers in symptom assessment of ADHD patients |
title_fullStr | Differences among fathers, mothers, and teachers in symptom assessment of ADHD patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences among fathers, mothers, and teachers in symptom assessment of ADHD patients |
title_short | Differences among fathers, mothers, and teachers in symptom assessment of ADHD patients |
title_sort | differences among fathers, mothers, and teachers in symptom assessment of adhd patients |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1029672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangxia differencesamongfathersmothersandteachersinsymptomassessmentofadhdpatients AT lihuiqin differencesamongfathersmothersandteachersinsymptomassessmentofadhdpatients AT simpsonalan differencesamongfathersmothersandteachersinsymptomassessmentofadhdpatients AT xujiajun differencesamongfathersmothersandteachersinsymptomassessmentofadhdpatients AT tangwanjie differencesamongfathersmothersandteachersinsymptomassessmentofadhdpatients AT liyuanyuan differencesamongfathersmothersandteachersinsymptomassessmentofadhdpatients |