Cargando…
Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft
The present randomized control was conducted clinically to evaluate the effectiveness of Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft (ADMA) and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft (SCTG) in combination with Coronally Positioned Flap (CPF) in the treatment of Miller's class I and II multiple gingival re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Biomedical Informatics
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426496 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630018801 |
_version_ | 1785069405343842304 |
---|---|
author | Sood, Ridhima Shergill, Sumanpreet Singh, Jyotsana Sharma, Ena Ridhi, Garg |
author_facet | Sood, Ridhima Shergill, Sumanpreet Singh, Jyotsana Sharma, Ena Ridhi, Garg |
author_sort | Sood, Ridhima |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present randomized control was conducted clinically to evaluate the effectiveness of Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft (ADMA) and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft (SCTG) in combination with Coronally Positioned Flap (CPF) in the treatment of Miller's class I and II multiple gingival recession in aesthetic areas. A total of 20 patients aged between 18 to 40 years were selected for this study, meeting all the criteria for inclusion. 10 patients were treated with ADMA and 10 patients with SCTG in combination with CPF. Various clinical parameters were assessed viz. probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession height (RH) and width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) at baseline and 6 months after surgery. The mean RH at baseline in the control and test groups was 3.05 ±0 .55(mean± SD) and 2.60 ±.99 respectively. At 3 months the mean RH was found to be 1.60±0.74 and 1.05 ± .60 in the control and test group respectively. The mean percentage of root coverage (MRC%) at 6 months in the control and test group was 65.69 ±26.52 (mean± SD) and 65.54 ±.9.16 respectively but no statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups. The results of the study suggest that the combination of both subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft with a coronally positioned flap can produce an equivalent amount of esthetic root coverage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10326341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Biomedical Informatics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103263412023-07-08 Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft Sood, Ridhima Shergill, Sumanpreet Singh, Jyotsana Sharma, Ena Ridhi, Garg Bioinformation Research Article The present randomized control was conducted clinically to evaluate the effectiveness of Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft (ADMA) and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft (SCTG) in combination with Coronally Positioned Flap (CPF) in the treatment of Miller's class I and II multiple gingival recession in aesthetic areas. A total of 20 patients aged between 18 to 40 years were selected for this study, meeting all the criteria for inclusion. 10 patients were treated with ADMA and 10 patients with SCTG in combination with CPF. Various clinical parameters were assessed viz. probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession height (RH) and width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) at baseline and 6 months after surgery. The mean RH at baseline in the control and test groups was 3.05 ±0 .55(mean± SD) and 2.60 ±.99 respectively. At 3 months the mean RH was found to be 1.60±0.74 and 1.05 ± .60 in the control and test group respectively. The mean percentage of root coverage (MRC%) at 6 months in the control and test group was 65.69 ±26.52 (mean± SD) and 65.54 ±.9.16 respectively but no statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups. The results of the study suggest that the combination of both subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft with a coronally positioned flap can produce an equivalent amount of esthetic root coverage. Biomedical Informatics 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10326341/ /pubmed/37426496 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630018801 Text en © 2022 Biomedical Informatics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sood, Ridhima Shergill, Sumanpreet Singh, Jyotsana Sharma, Ena Ridhi, Garg Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft |
title | Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft |
title_full | Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft |
title_fullStr | Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft |
title_short | Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft |
title_sort | treatment of gingival class i or class ii recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426496 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630018801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soodridhima treatmentofgingivalclassiorclassiirecessionusingsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftandacellulardermalmatrixallograft AT shergillsumanpreet treatmentofgingivalclassiorclassiirecessionusingsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftandacellulardermalmatrixallograft AT singhjyotsana treatmentofgingivalclassiorclassiirecessionusingsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftandacellulardermalmatrixallograft AT sharmaena treatmentofgingivalclassiorclassiirecessionusingsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftandacellulardermalmatrixallograft AT ridhigarg treatmentofgingivalclassiorclassiirecessionusingsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftandacellulardermalmatrixallograft |