Cargando…

Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft

The present randomized control was conducted clinically to evaluate the effectiveness of Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft (ADMA) and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft (SCTG) in combination with Coronally Positioned Flap (CPF) in the treatment of Miller's class I and II multiple gingival re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sood, Ridhima, Shergill, Sumanpreet, Singh, Jyotsana, Sharma, Ena, Ridhi, Garg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Biomedical Informatics 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426496
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630018801
_version_ 1785069405343842304
author Sood, Ridhima
Shergill, Sumanpreet
Singh, Jyotsana
Sharma, Ena
Ridhi, Garg
author_facet Sood, Ridhima
Shergill, Sumanpreet
Singh, Jyotsana
Sharma, Ena
Ridhi, Garg
author_sort Sood, Ridhima
collection PubMed
description The present randomized control was conducted clinically to evaluate the effectiveness of Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft (ADMA) and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft (SCTG) in combination with Coronally Positioned Flap (CPF) in the treatment of Miller's class I and II multiple gingival recession in aesthetic areas. A total of 20 patients aged between 18 to 40 years were selected for this study, meeting all the criteria for inclusion. 10 patients were treated with ADMA and 10 patients with SCTG in combination with CPF. Various clinical parameters were assessed viz. probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession height (RH) and width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) at baseline and 6 months after surgery. The mean RH at baseline in the control and test groups was 3.05 ±0 .55(mean± SD) and 2.60 ±.99 respectively. At 3 months the mean RH was found to be 1.60±0.74 and 1.05 ± .60 in the control and test group respectively. The mean percentage of root coverage (MRC%) at 6 months in the control and test group was 65.69 ±26.52 (mean± SD) and 65.54 ±.9.16 respectively but no statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups. The results of the study suggest that the combination of both subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft with a coronally positioned flap can produce an equivalent amount of esthetic root coverage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10326341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Biomedical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103263412023-07-08 Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft Sood, Ridhima Shergill, Sumanpreet Singh, Jyotsana Sharma, Ena Ridhi, Garg Bioinformation Research Article The present randomized control was conducted clinically to evaluate the effectiveness of Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft (ADMA) and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft (SCTG) in combination with Coronally Positioned Flap (CPF) in the treatment of Miller's class I and II multiple gingival recession in aesthetic areas. A total of 20 patients aged between 18 to 40 years were selected for this study, meeting all the criteria for inclusion. 10 patients were treated with ADMA and 10 patients with SCTG in combination with CPF. Various clinical parameters were assessed viz. probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession height (RH) and width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) at baseline and 6 months after surgery. The mean RH at baseline in the control and test groups was 3.05 ±0 .55(mean± SD) and 2.60 ±.99 respectively. At 3 months the mean RH was found to be 1.60±0.74 and 1.05 ± .60 in the control and test group respectively. The mean percentage of root coverage (MRC%) at 6 months in the control and test group was 65.69 ±26.52 (mean± SD) and 65.54 ±.9.16 respectively but no statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups. The results of the study suggest that the combination of both subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft with a coronally positioned flap can produce an equivalent amount of esthetic root coverage. Biomedical Informatics 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10326341/ /pubmed/37426496 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630018801 Text en © 2022 Biomedical Informatics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sood, Ridhima
Shergill, Sumanpreet
Singh, Jyotsana
Sharma, Ena
Ridhi, Garg
Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft
title Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft
title_full Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft
title_fullStr Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft
title_short Treatment of gingival class I or class II recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft
title_sort treatment of gingival class i or class ii recession using subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426496
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630018801
work_keys_str_mv AT soodridhima treatmentofgingivalclassiorclassiirecessionusingsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftandacellulardermalmatrixallograft
AT shergillsumanpreet treatmentofgingivalclassiorclassiirecessionusingsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftandacellulardermalmatrixallograft
AT singhjyotsana treatmentofgingivalclassiorclassiirecessionusingsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftandacellulardermalmatrixallograft
AT sharmaena treatmentofgingivalclassiorclassiirecessionusingsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftandacellulardermalmatrixallograft
AT ridhigarg treatmentofgingivalclassiorclassiirecessionusingsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftandacellulardermalmatrixallograft