Cargando…

Dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Many individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders experience insufficient symptom relief from currently available treatment options. Researching additional venues should be prioritized. This systematic review, designed in accordance with PRISMA, examined the effect of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tyssedal, Malene Kalsnes, Johnsen, Erik, Brønstad, Aurora, Skrede, Silje
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1192075
_version_ 1785069426360451072
author Tyssedal, Malene Kalsnes
Johnsen, Erik
Brønstad, Aurora
Skrede, Silje
author_facet Tyssedal, Malene Kalsnes
Johnsen, Erik
Brønstad, Aurora
Skrede, Silje
author_sort Tyssedal, Malene Kalsnes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders experience insufficient symptom relief from currently available treatment options. Researching additional venues should be prioritized. This systematic review, designed in accordance with PRISMA, examined the effect of targeted and structured dog-assisted interventions as a supplementary treatment. METHODS: Randomized as well as non-randomized studies were included. Systematic searches were conducted in APA PsycInfo, AMED, CENTRAL, Cinahl, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and in several sources covering “gray” (unpublished) literature. In addition, forward and backward citation searches were performed. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Quality of evidence and risk of bias were assessed in accordance with GRADE and RoB2/ROBINS-I criteria. RESULTS: 12 publications from 11 different studies met eligibility criteria. Overall, studies showed diverging results. General psychopathology, positive and negative symptoms of psychosis, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, self-determination, lower body strength, social function, and quality of life were among the outcome measures with significant improvement. Most documentation for significant improvement was found for positive symptoms. One study indicated significant deterioration of non-personal social behavior. The risk of bias was high or serious for most of the outcome measures. Three outcome measures were associated with some concerns regarding risk of bias, and three with low risk of bias. Quality of evidence was graded low or very low for all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies indicate potential effects of dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders, mostly beneficial. Nevertheless, low number of participants, heterogeneity, and risk of bias complicate the interpretation of results. Carefully designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine causality between interventions and treatment effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10326428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103264282023-07-08 Dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review Tyssedal, Malene Kalsnes Johnsen, Erik Brønstad, Aurora Skrede, Silje Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Many individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders experience insufficient symptom relief from currently available treatment options. Researching additional venues should be prioritized. This systematic review, designed in accordance with PRISMA, examined the effect of targeted and structured dog-assisted interventions as a supplementary treatment. METHODS: Randomized as well as non-randomized studies were included. Systematic searches were conducted in APA PsycInfo, AMED, CENTRAL, Cinahl, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and in several sources covering “gray” (unpublished) literature. In addition, forward and backward citation searches were performed. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Quality of evidence and risk of bias were assessed in accordance with GRADE and RoB2/ROBINS-I criteria. RESULTS: 12 publications from 11 different studies met eligibility criteria. Overall, studies showed diverging results. General psychopathology, positive and negative symptoms of psychosis, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, self-determination, lower body strength, social function, and quality of life were among the outcome measures with significant improvement. Most documentation for significant improvement was found for positive symptoms. One study indicated significant deterioration of non-personal social behavior. The risk of bias was high or serious for most of the outcome measures. Three outcome measures were associated with some concerns regarding risk of bias, and three with low risk of bias. Quality of evidence was graded low or very low for all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies indicate potential effects of dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders, mostly beneficial. Nevertheless, low number of participants, heterogeneity, and risk of bias complicate the interpretation of results. Carefully designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine causality between interventions and treatment effects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10326428/ /pubmed/37426092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1192075 Text en Copyright © 2023 Tyssedal, Johnsen, Brønstad and Skrede. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Tyssedal, Malene Kalsnes
Johnsen, Erik
Brønstad, Aurora
Skrede, Silje
Dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review
title Dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review
title_full Dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review
title_fullStr Dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review
title_short Dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review
title_sort dog-assisted interventions for adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1192075
work_keys_str_mv AT tyssedalmalenekalsnes dogassistedinterventionsforadultsdiagnosedwithschizophreniaandrelateddisordersasystematicreview
AT johnsenerik dogassistedinterventionsforadultsdiagnosedwithschizophreniaandrelateddisordersasystematicreview
AT brønstadaurora dogassistedinterventionsforadultsdiagnosedwithschizophreniaandrelateddisordersasystematicreview
AT skredesilje dogassistedinterventionsforadultsdiagnosedwithschizophreniaandrelateddisordersasystematicreview