Cargando…

Fragility index of positive phase II and III randomised clinical trials of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (2002–2022)

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The fragility index (FI), i.e., theminimum number of best survivors reassigned to the control group required to revert the statistically significant result of a clinical trial to non-significant, is a metric to evaluate the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sidali, Sabrina, Sritharan, Nanthara, Campani, Claudia, Gregory, Jules, Durand, François, Ganne-Carrié, Nathalie, Ronot, Maxime, Lévy, Vincent, Nault, Jean-Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100755
_version_ 1785069476488675328
author Sidali, Sabrina
Sritharan, Nanthara
Campani, Claudia
Gregory, Jules
Durand, François
Ganne-Carrié, Nathalie
Ronot, Maxime
Lévy, Vincent
Nault, Jean-Charles
author_facet Sidali, Sabrina
Sritharan, Nanthara
Campani, Claudia
Gregory, Jules
Durand, François
Ganne-Carrié, Nathalie
Ronot, Maxime
Lévy, Vincent
Nault, Jean-Charles
author_sort Sidali, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & AIMS: The fragility index (FI), i.e., theminimum number of best survivors reassigned to the control group required to revert the statistically significant result of a clinical trial to non-significant, is a metric to evaluate the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to assess the FI in the field of HCC. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of phase 2 and 3 RCTs for the treatment of HCC published between 2002 and 2022. We included two-arm studies with 1:1 randomization and significant positive results for a primary time-to-event endpoint for the FI calculation, which involves the iterative addition of a best survivor from the experimental group to the control group, until positive significance (p <0,05, Log-rank test) is lost. RESULTS: We identified 51 phase 2 and 3 positive RCTs, of which 29 (57%) were eligible for fragility index calculation. After reconstruction of the Kaplan-Meier curves, 25/29 studies remained significant, among which the analysis was performed. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) FI was 5 (2-10) and Fragility Quotient (FQ) was 3% (1%-6%). Ten trials (40%) had a FI of 2 or less. FI was positively correlated to the blind assessment of the primary endpoint (median FI 9 with blind assessment versus 2 without, p = 0.01), the number of reported events in the control arm (RS = 0.45, p = 0.02) and to impact factor (RS = 0.58, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Several phases 2 and 3 RCTs in HCC have a low fragility index, underlying the limited robustness on the conclusion of their superiority over control treatments. The fragility index might provide an additional tool to assess the robustness of clinical trial data in HCC. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The fragility index is a method to assess robustness of a clinical trial and is defined the minimum number of best survivors reassigned to the control group required to revert the statistically significant result of a clinical trial to non-significant. Among 25 randomised controlled trials in HCC, the median fragility index was 5, and 10 trials among 25 (40%) had a fragility index of 2 or less, indicating an important fragility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10326696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103266962023-07-08 Fragility index of positive phase II and III randomised clinical trials of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (2002–2022) Sidali, Sabrina Sritharan, Nanthara Campani, Claudia Gregory, Jules Durand, François Ganne-Carrié, Nathalie Ronot, Maxime Lévy, Vincent Nault, Jean-Charles JHEP Rep Research Article BACKGROUND & AIMS: The fragility index (FI), i.e., theminimum number of best survivors reassigned to the control group required to revert the statistically significant result of a clinical trial to non-significant, is a metric to evaluate the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to assess the FI in the field of HCC. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of phase 2 and 3 RCTs for the treatment of HCC published between 2002 and 2022. We included two-arm studies with 1:1 randomization and significant positive results for a primary time-to-event endpoint for the FI calculation, which involves the iterative addition of a best survivor from the experimental group to the control group, until positive significance (p <0,05, Log-rank test) is lost. RESULTS: We identified 51 phase 2 and 3 positive RCTs, of which 29 (57%) were eligible for fragility index calculation. After reconstruction of the Kaplan-Meier curves, 25/29 studies remained significant, among which the analysis was performed. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) FI was 5 (2-10) and Fragility Quotient (FQ) was 3% (1%-6%). Ten trials (40%) had a FI of 2 or less. FI was positively correlated to the blind assessment of the primary endpoint (median FI 9 with blind assessment versus 2 without, p = 0.01), the number of reported events in the control arm (RS = 0.45, p = 0.02) and to impact factor (RS = 0.58, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Several phases 2 and 3 RCTs in HCC have a low fragility index, underlying the limited robustness on the conclusion of their superiority over control treatments. The fragility index might provide an additional tool to assess the robustness of clinical trial data in HCC. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The fragility index is a method to assess robustness of a clinical trial and is defined the minimum number of best survivors reassigned to the control group required to revert the statistically significant result of a clinical trial to non-significant. Among 25 randomised controlled trials in HCC, the median fragility index was 5, and 10 trials among 25 (40%) had a fragility index of 2 or less, indicating an important fragility. Elsevier 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10326696/ /pubmed/37425214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100755 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Sidali, Sabrina
Sritharan, Nanthara
Campani, Claudia
Gregory, Jules
Durand, François
Ganne-Carrié, Nathalie
Ronot, Maxime
Lévy, Vincent
Nault, Jean-Charles
Fragility index of positive phase II and III randomised clinical trials of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (2002–2022)
title Fragility index of positive phase II and III randomised clinical trials of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (2002–2022)
title_full Fragility index of positive phase II and III randomised clinical trials of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (2002–2022)
title_fullStr Fragility index of positive phase II and III randomised clinical trials of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (2002–2022)
title_full_unstemmed Fragility index of positive phase II and III randomised clinical trials of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (2002–2022)
title_short Fragility index of positive phase II and III randomised clinical trials of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (2002–2022)
title_sort fragility index of positive phase ii and iii randomised clinical trials of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (2002–2022)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100755
work_keys_str_mv AT sidalisabrina fragilityindexofpositivephaseiiandiiirandomisedclinicaltrialsoftreatmentsforhepatocellularcarcinoma20022022
AT sritharannanthara fragilityindexofpositivephaseiiandiiirandomisedclinicaltrialsoftreatmentsforhepatocellularcarcinoma20022022
AT campaniclaudia fragilityindexofpositivephaseiiandiiirandomisedclinicaltrialsoftreatmentsforhepatocellularcarcinoma20022022
AT gregoryjules fragilityindexofpositivephaseiiandiiirandomisedclinicaltrialsoftreatmentsforhepatocellularcarcinoma20022022
AT durandfrancois fragilityindexofpositivephaseiiandiiirandomisedclinicaltrialsoftreatmentsforhepatocellularcarcinoma20022022
AT gannecarrienathalie fragilityindexofpositivephaseiiandiiirandomisedclinicaltrialsoftreatmentsforhepatocellularcarcinoma20022022
AT ronotmaxime fragilityindexofpositivephaseiiandiiirandomisedclinicaltrialsoftreatmentsforhepatocellularcarcinoma20022022
AT levyvincent fragilityindexofpositivephaseiiandiiirandomisedclinicaltrialsoftreatmentsforhepatocellularcarcinoma20022022
AT naultjeancharles fragilityindexofpositivephaseiiandiiirandomisedclinicaltrialsoftreatmentsforhepatocellularcarcinoma20022022