Cargando…

Radiographic and endoscopic screening to reduce gastric cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews naïvely combined biased effects of screening radiography or endoscopy observed in studies with various designs. We aimed to synthesize currently available comparative data on gastric cancer mortality in healthy, asymptomatic adults by explicitly classifying th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hibino, Masaya, Hamashima, Chisato, Iwata, Mitsunaga, Terasawa, Teruhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37424675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100741
_version_ 1785069479585120256
author Hibino, Masaya
Hamashima, Chisato
Iwata, Mitsunaga
Terasawa, Teruhiko
author_facet Hibino, Masaya
Hamashima, Chisato
Iwata, Mitsunaga
Terasawa, Teruhiko
author_sort Hibino, Masaya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews naïvely combined biased effects of screening radiography or endoscopy observed in studies with various designs. We aimed to synthesize currently available comparative data on gastric cancer mortality in healthy, asymptomatic adults by explicitly classifying the screening effects through study designs and types of intervention effects. METHODS: We searched multiple databases through October 31, 2022 for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies of any design that compared gastric cancer mortality among radiographic or endoscopic screening and no screening in a community-dwelling adult population were included. The method included a duplicate assessment of eligibility, double extraction of summary data, and validity assessment using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Bayesian three-level hierarchical random-effects meta-analysis synthesized data corrected for self-selection bias on the relative risk (RR) for per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-screen (ITS) effects. The study registration number at PROSPERO is CRD42021277126. FINDINGS: We included seven studies in which a screening program was newly introduced (median attendance rate, 31%; at moderate-to-critical risk of bias), and seven cohort and eight case–control studies with ongoing screening programs (median attendance rate, 21%; all at critical risk of bias); thus, data of 1,667,117 subjects were included. For the PP effect, the average risk reduction was significant for endoscopy (RR 0.52; 95% credible interval: 0.39–0.79) but nonsignificant for radiography (0.80; 0.60–1.06). The ITS effect was not significant for both radiography (0.98; 0.86–1.09) and endoscopy (0.94; 0.71–1.28). The magnitude of the effects depended on the assumptions for the self-selection bias correction. Restricting the scope to East Asian studies only did not change the results. INTERPRETATION: In limited-quality observational evidence from high-prevalence regions, screening reduced gastric cancer mortality; however, the effects diminished at a program level. FUNDING: 10.13039/100015322National Cancer Center Japan; and 10.13039/100009619Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10326711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103267112023-07-08 Radiographic and endoscopic screening to reduce gastric cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hibino, Masaya Hamashima, Chisato Iwata, Mitsunaga Terasawa, Teruhiko Lancet Reg Health West Pac Articles BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews naïvely combined biased effects of screening radiography or endoscopy observed in studies with various designs. We aimed to synthesize currently available comparative data on gastric cancer mortality in healthy, asymptomatic adults by explicitly classifying the screening effects through study designs and types of intervention effects. METHODS: We searched multiple databases through October 31, 2022 for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies of any design that compared gastric cancer mortality among radiographic or endoscopic screening and no screening in a community-dwelling adult population were included. The method included a duplicate assessment of eligibility, double extraction of summary data, and validity assessment using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Bayesian three-level hierarchical random-effects meta-analysis synthesized data corrected for self-selection bias on the relative risk (RR) for per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-screen (ITS) effects. The study registration number at PROSPERO is CRD42021277126. FINDINGS: We included seven studies in which a screening program was newly introduced (median attendance rate, 31%; at moderate-to-critical risk of bias), and seven cohort and eight case–control studies with ongoing screening programs (median attendance rate, 21%; all at critical risk of bias); thus, data of 1,667,117 subjects were included. For the PP effect, the average risk reduction was significant for endoscopy (RR 0.52; 95% credible interval: 0.39–0.79) but nonsignificant for radiography (0.80; 0.60–1.06). The ITS effect was not significant for both radiography (0.98; 0.86–1.09) and endoscopy (0.94; 0.71–1.28). The magnitude of the effects depended on the assumptions for the self-selection bias correction. Restricting the scope to East Asian studies only did not change the results. INTERPRETATION: In limited-quality observational evidence from high-prevalence regions, screening reduced gastric cancer mortality; however, the effects diminished at a program level. FUNDING: 10.13039/100015322National Cancer Center Japan; and 10.13039/100009619Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. Elsevier 2023-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10326711/ /pubmed/37424675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100741 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Hibino, Masaya
Hamashima, Chisato
Iwata, Mitsunaga
Terasawa, Teruhiko
Radiographic and endoscopic screening to reduce gastric cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Radiographic and endoscopic screening to reduce gastric cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Radiographic and endoscopic screening to reduce gastric cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Radiographic and endoscopic screening to reduce gastric cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Radiographic and endoscopic screening to reduce gastric cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Radiographic and endoscopic screening to reduce gastric cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort radiographic and endoscopic screening to reduce gastric cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37424675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100741
work_keys_str_mv AT hibinomasaya radiographicandendoscopicscreeningtoreducegastriccancermortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hamashimachisato radiographicandendoscopicscreeningtoreducegastriccancermortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT iwatamitsunaga radiographicandendoscopicscreeningtoreducegastriccancermortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT terasawateruhiko radiographicandendoscopicscreeningtoreducegastriccancermortalityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis