Cargando…

An ear-shaped film with a “leg”

BACKGROUND: The reconstructed auricle projection is an essential element of ear reconstruction. The novel use of an ear-shaped film with one or two “legs” can successfully provide a healthy auricular contour, length, and width, hence improving the three-dimensional (3D) contour of the reconstructed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Luosha, Sun, Pengfei, Jia, Litao, Pan, Bo, Jiang, Haiyue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37427062
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-22-477
_version_ 1785069486301249536
author Gu, Luosha
Sun, Pengfei
Jia, Litao
Pan, Bo
Jiang, Haiyue
author_facet Gu, Luosha
Sun, Pengfei
Jia, Litao
Pan, Bo
Jiang, Haiyue
author_sort Gu, Luosha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The reconstructed auricle projection is an essential element of ear reconstruction. The novel use of an ear-shaped film with one or two “legs” can successfully provide a healthy auricular contour, length, and width, hence improving the three-dimensional (3D) contour of the reconstructed auricle. METHODS: Sixty-one patients (31 men and 30 women) with unilateral ear reconstruction (22 on the left and 39 on the right side) who underwent auricular reconstruction using the novel ear-shaped film at the Plastic Surgery Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between February 2021 and June 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Using the Jarque-Bera and paired t-test, we found no statistically significant differences between the reconstructive and healthy ears in terms of length (5.93±0.56 vs. 5.89±0.49 cm, P=0.208), width (3.15±0.31 vs. 3.13±0.30 cm, P=0.224), height (2.48±0.33 vs. 2.51±0.36 cm, P=0.079), and perimeter (10.83±1.06 vs. 10.69±0.95 cm, P=0.164), using the novel ear-shaped film. The reconstructed auricle location was deemed satisfactory for all patients and their families. CONCLUSIONS: The novel ear-shaped film may reflect the structure and height of the auricle during ear reconstruction surgery. Implementing this method is easy, and its impact is significant. This technique can be widely used in all types of otoplasties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10326750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103267502023-07-08 An ear-shaped film with a “leg” Gu, Luosha Sun, Pengfei Jia, Litao Pan, Bo Jiang, Haiyue Transl Pediatr Original Article BACKGROUND: The reconstructed auricle projection is an essential element of ear reconstruction. The novel use of an ear-shaped film with one or two “legs” can successfully provide a healthy auricular contour, length, and width, hence improving the three-dimensional (3D) contour of the reconstructed auricle. METHODS: Sixty-one patients (31 men and 30 women) with unilateral ear reconstruction (22 on the left and 39 on the right side) who underwent auricular reconstruction using the novel ear-shaped film at the Plastic Surgery Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between February 2021 and June 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Using the Jarque-Bera and paired t-test, we found no statistically significant differences between the reconstructive and healthy ears in terms of length (5.93±0.56 vs. 5.89±0.49 cm, P=0.208), width (3.15±0.31 vs. 3.13±0.30 cm, P=0.224), height (2.48±0.33 vs. 2.51±0.36 cm, P=0.079), and perimeter (10.83±1.06 vs. 10.69±0.95 cm, P=0.164), using the novel ear-shaped film. The reconstructed auricle location was deemed satisfactory for all patients and their families. CONCLUSIONS: The novel ear-shaped film may reflect the structure and height of the auricle during ear reconstruction surgery. Implementing this method is easy, and its impact is significant. This technique can be widely used in all types of otoplasties. AME Publishing Company 2023-06-20 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10326750/ /pubmed/37427062 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-22-477 Text en 2023 Translational Pediatrics. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Gu, Luosha
Sun, Pengfei
Jia, Litao
Pan, Bo
Jiang, Haiyue
An ear-shaped film with a “leg”
title An ear-shaped film with a “leg”
title_full An ear-shaped film with a “leg”
title_fullStr An ear-shaped film with a “leg”
title_full_unstemmed An ear-shaped film with a “leg”
title_short An ear-shaped film with a “leg”
title_sort ear-shaped film with a “leg”
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37427062
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-22-477
work_keys_str_mv AT guluosha anearshapedfilmwithaleg
AT sunpengfei anearshapedfilmwithaleg
AT jialitao anearshapedfilmwithaleg
AT panbo anearshapedfilmwithaleg
AT jianghaiyue anearshapedfilmwithaleg
AT guluosha earshapedfilmwithaleg
AT sunpengfei earshapedfilmwithaleg
AT jialitao earshapedfilmwithaleg
AT panbo earshapedfilmwithaleg
AT jianghaiyue earshapedfilmwithaleg