Cargando…

Does infant sensory responsiveness explain exclusive breastfeeding 6 months after birth?—a cohort prospective study

BACKGROUND: Although exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is recommended for the first 6 months of life, breastfeeding rates in most developed countries are low. Sensory over-responsivity (SOR) has been found to interfere with infant and childcare, development, and routines, but has not yet been examined a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freund-Azaria, Adi, Bart, Orit, Regev, Rivka, Bar-Shalita, Tami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37427057
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-22-596
_version_ 1785069487460974592
author Freund-Azaria, Adi
Bart, Orit
Regev, Rivka
Bar-Shalita, Tami
author_facet Freund-Azaria, Adi
Bart, Orit
Regev, Rivka
Bar-Shalita, Tami
author_sort Freund-Azaria, Adi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is recommended for the first 6 months of life, breastfeeding rates in most developed countries are low. Sensory over-responsivity (SOR) has been found to interfere with infant and childcare, development, and routines, but has not yet been examined as a breastfeeding barrier. The aim of this study was to explore the association between infant sensory responsiveness and EBF and whether it can predict EBF cessation prior to 6 months of age. METHODS: In this cohort prospective study participants were 164 mothers and their infants recruited 2 days after birth in a maternity ward between June 2019 and August 2020. At this time, participating mothers completed a demographic and delivery information questionnaire. At 6 weeks after birth, the mothers completed the Infant Sensory Profile 2 (ISP2), reporting their infants’ sensory responsiveness in daily activities. At 6 months, infants’ sensory responsiveness was assessed using the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI) and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-3(rd) Edition (Bayley-III) was administered. Additionally, mothers provided information about their breastfeeding status and were divided into two groups accordingly: EBF and non-EBF (NEBF). RESULTS: The incidence of atypical sensory responsiveness (mostly of the SOR type) at 6 weeks was twice as high among NEBF infants than EBF infants (36.2% vs. 17%, χ(2)=7.41, P=0.006). Significant group differences were found in the ISP2 touch section (F=10.22, P=0.002). In addition, NEBF infants displayed more SOR behaviors than EBF infants in the TSFI deep touch (F=2.916, P=0.001) and tactile integration subtests (F=3.095, P<0.001), and had lower scores in the adaptive motor functions subtest (F=2.443, P=0.013). Logistic regression modeling revealed that ISP2 at 6 weeks (typical vs. atypical) and TSFI total score at 6 months predicted 28% of NEBF at 6 months (χ(2)=23.072, P=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Infant atypical sensory responsiveness, predominantly of the SOR type, was found to predict NEBF at 6 months after birth. This study contributes to the understanding of EBF barriers, highlighting the importance of early identification of SOR in infants. Findings may suggest developing early sensory interventions and providing individualized breastfeeding support tailored to the infant’s unique sensory profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10326755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103267552023-07-08 Does infant sensory responsiveness explain exclusive breastfeeding 6 months after birth?—a cohort prospective study Freund-Azaria, Adi Bart, Orit Regev, Rivka Bar-Shalita, Tami Transl Pediatr Original Article BACKGROUND: Although exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is recommended for the first 6 months of life, breastfeeding rates in most developed countries are low. Sensory over-responsivity (SOR) has been found to interfere with infant and childcare, development, and routines, but has not yet been examined as a breastfeeding barrier. The aim of this study was to explore the association between infant sensory responsiveness and EBF and whether it can predict EBF cessation prior to 6 months of age. METHODS: In this cohort prospective study participants were 164 mothers and their infants recruited 2 days after birth in a maternity ward between June 2019 and August 2020. At this time, participating mothers completed a demographic and delivery information questionnaire. At 6 weeks after birth, the mothers completed the Infant Sensory Profile 2 (ISP2), reporting their infants’ sensory responsiveness in daily activities. At 6 months, infants’ sensory responsiveness was assessed using the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI) and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-3(rd) Edition (Bayley-III) was administered. Additionally, mothers provided information about their breastfeeding status and were divided into two groups accordingly: EBF and non-EBF (NEBF). RESULTS: The incidence of atypical sensory responsiveness (mostly of the SOR type) at 6 weeks was twice as high among NEBF infants than EBF infants (36.2% vs. 17%, χ(2)=7.41, P=0.006). Significant group differences were found in the ISP2 touch section (F=10.22, P=0.002). In addition, NEBF infants displayed more SOR behaviors than EBF infants in the TSFI deep touch (F=2.916, P=0.001) and tactile integration subtests (F=3.095, P<0.001), and had lower scores in the adaptive motor functions subtest (F=2.443, P=0.013). Logistic regression modeling revealed that ISP2 at 6 weeks (typical vs. atypical) and TSFI total score at 6 months predicted 28% of NEBF at 6 months (χ(2)=23.072, P=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Infant atypical sensory responsiveness, predominantly of the SOR type, was found to predict NEBF at 6 months after birth. This study contributes to the understanding of EBF barriers, highlighting the importance of early identification of SOR in infants. Findings may suggest developing early sensory interventions and providing individualized breastfeeding support tailored to the infant’s unique sensory profile. AME Publishing Company 2023-06-08 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10326755/ /pubmed/37427057 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-22-596 Text en 2023 Translational Pediatrics. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Freund-Azaria, Adi
Bart, Orit
Regev, Rivka
Bar-Shalita, Tami
Does infant sensory responsiveness explain exclusive breastfeeding 6 months after birth?—a cohort prospective study
title Does infant sensory responsiveness explain exclusive breastfeeding 6 months after birth?—a cohort prospective study
title_full Does infant sensory responsiveness explain exclusive breastfeeding 6 months after birth?—a cohort prospective study
title_fullStr Does infant sensory responsiveness explain exclusive breastfeeding 6 months after birth?—a cohort prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Does infant sensory responsiveness explain exclusive breastfeeding 6 months after birth?—a cohort prospective study
title_short Does infant sensory responsiveness explain exclusive breastfeeding 6 months after birth?—a cohort prospective study
title_sort does infant sensory responsiveness explain exclusive breastfeeding 6 months after birth?—a cohort prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37427057
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-22-596
work_keys_str_mv AT freundazariaadi doesinfantsensoryresponsivenessexplainexclusivebreastfeeding6monthsafterbirthacohortprospectivestudy
AT bartorit doesinfantsensoryresponsivenessexplainexclusivebreastfeeding6monthsafterbirthacohortprospectivestudy
AT regevrivka doesinfantsensoryresponsivenessexplainexclusivebreastfeeding6monthsafterbirthacohortprospectivestudy
AT barshalitatami doesinfantsensoryresponsivenessexplainexclusivebreastfeeding6monthsafterbirthacohortprospectivestudy