Cargando…

Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a frozen-embryo transfer in an artificially-prepared endometrium (FET-HRT) cycle yield similar clinical pregnancy rate with 7 days of oestrogen priming compared to 14 days? DESIGN: This is a single-centre, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study. All FET-HRT cycles wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Racca, Annalisa, Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel, Drakopoulos, Panagiotis, De Coppel, Joran, Van Landuyt, Lisbet, Tournaye, Herman, Blockeel, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01111-8
_version_ 1785069531306131456
author Racca, Annalisa
Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
De Coppel, Joran
Van Landuyt, Lisbet
Tournaye, Herman
Blockeel, Christophe
author_facet Racca, Annalisa
Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
De Coppel, Joran
Van Landuyt, Lisbet
Tournaye, Herman
Blockeel, Christophe
author_sort Racca, Annalisa
collection PubMed
description RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a frozen-embryo transfer in an artificially-prepared endometrium (FET-HRT) cycle yield similar clinical pregnancy rate with 7 days of oestrogen priming compared to 14 days? DESIGN: This is a single-centre, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study. All FET-HRT cycles were performed in a tertiary centre between October 2018 and January 2021. Overall, 160 patients were randomized, with a 1:1 allocation, into two groups of 80 patients each: group A (7 days of E2 prior to P4 supplementation) and group B (14 days of E2 prior to P4 supplementation). Both groups received single blastocyst stage embryos on the 6th day of vaginal P4 administration. The primary outcome was the feasibility of such strategy assessed as clinical pregnancy rate, secondary outcomes were biochemical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate and serum hormone levels on the day of FET. Chemical pregnancy was assessed by an hCG blood test 12 days after FET and clinical pregnancy was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks. RESULTS: The analysis included 160 patients who were randomly assigned to either group A or group B on the seventh day of their FET-HRT cycle if the measured endometrial thickness was above 6.5 mm. Following screening failures and of drop-outs, 144 patients were finally included both in group A (75 patients) or group B (69 patients). Demographic characteristics for both groups were comparable. The biochemical pregnancy rate was 42.5% and 48.8% for group A and group B, respectively (p 0.526). Regarding the clinical pregnancy rate at 7 weeks, no statistical difference was observed (36.3% vs 46.3% for group A and group B, respectively, p = 0.261). The secondary outcomes of the study (biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rate) were comparable between the two groups for IIT analysis, as well as the P4 values on the day of FET. CONCLUSIONS: In a frozen embryo transfer cycle, performed with artificial preparation of the endometrium, 7 versus 14 days of oestrogen priming are comparable, in terms of clinical pregnancy rate; the advantages of a seven-day protocol include the shorter time to pregnancy, reduced exposure to oestrogens, and more flexibility of scheduling and programming, and less probability to recruit a follicle and have a spontaneous LH surge. It is important to keep in mind that this study was designed as a pilot trial with a limited study population as such it was underpowered to determine the superiority of an intervention over another; larger-scale RCTs are warranted to confirm our preliminary results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: NCT03930706.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10326948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103269482023-07-08 Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming Racca, Annalisa Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel Drakopoulos, Panagiotis De Coppel, Joran Van Landuyt, Lisbet Tournaye, Herman Blockeel, Christophe Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a frozen-embryo transfer in an artificially-prepared endometrium (FET-HRT) cycle yield similar clinical pregnancy rate with 7 days of oestrogen priming compared to 14 days? DESIGN: This is a single-centre, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study. All FET-HRT cycles were performed in a tertiary centre between October 2018 and January 2021. Overall, 160 patients were randomized, with a 1:1 allocation, into two groups of 80 patients each: group A (7 days of E2 prior to P4 supplementation) and group B (14 days of E2 prior to P4 supplementation). Both groups received single blastocyst stage embryos on the 6th day of vaginal P4 administration. The primary outcome was the feasibility of such strategy assessed as clinical pregnancy rate, secondary outcomes were biochemical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate and serum hormone levels on the day of FET. Chemical pregnancy was assessed by an hCG blood test 12 days after FET and clinical pregnancy was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks. RESULTS: The analysis included 160 patients who were randomly assigned to either group A or group B on the seventh day of their FET-HRT cycle if the measured endometrial thickness was above 6.5 mm. Following screening failures and of drop-outs, 144 patients were finally included both in group A (75 patients) or group B (69 patients). Demographic characteristics for both groups were comparable. The biochemical pregnancy rate was 42.5% and 48.8% for group A and group B, respectively (p 0.526). Regarding the clinical pregnancy rate at 7 weeks, no statistical difference was observed (36.3% vs 46.3% for group A and group B, respectively, p = 0.261). The secondary outcomes of the study (biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rate) were comparable between the two groups for IIT analysis, as well as the P4 values on the day of FET. CONCLUSIONS: In a frozen embryo transfer cycle, performed with artificial preparation of the endometrium, 7 versus 14 days of oestrogen priming are comparable, in terms of clinical pregnancy rate; the advantages of a seven-day protocol include the shorter time to pregnancy, reduced exposure to oestrogens, and more flexibility of scheduling and programming, and less probability to recruit a follicle and have a spontaneous LH surge. It is important to keep in mind that this study was designed as a pilot trial with a limited study population as such it was underpowered to determine the superiority of an intervention over another; larger-scale RCTs are warranted to confirm our preliminary results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: NCT03930706. BioMed Central 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10326948/ /pubmed/37420186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01111-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Racca, Annalisa
Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
De Coppel, Joran
Van Landuyt, Lisbet
Tournaye, Herman
Blockeel, Christophe
Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming
title Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming
title_full Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming
title_fullStr Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming
title_full_unstemmed Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming
title_short Clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with HRT: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming
title_sort clinical pregnancy rate for frozen embryo transfer with hrt: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing 1 week versus 2 weeks of oestradiol priming
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01111-8
work_keys_str_mv AT raccaannalisa clinicalpregnancyrateforfrozenembryotransferwithhrtarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudycomparing1weekversus2weeksofoestradiolpriming
AT santosribeirosamuel clinicalpregnancyrateforfrozenembryotransferwithhrtarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudycomparing1weekversus2weeksofoestradiolpriming
AT drakopoulospanagiotis clinicalpregnancyrateforfrozenembryotransferwithhrtarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudycomparing1weekversus2weeksofoestradiolpriming
AT decoppeljoran clinicalpregnancyrateforfrozenembryotransferwithhrtarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudycomparing1weekversus2weeksofoestradiolpriming
AT vanlanduytlisbet clinicalpregnancyrateforfrozenembryotransferwithhrtarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudycomparing1weekversus2weeksofoestradiolpriming
AT tournayeherman clinicalpregnancyrateforfrozenembryotransferwithhrtarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudycomparing1weekversus2weeksofoestradiolpriming
AT blockeelchristophe clinicalpregnancyrateforfrozenembryotransferwithhrtarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudycomparing1weekversus2weeksofoestradiolpriming