Cargando…

Retention of zirconia crowns to titanium bases with straight versus angled screw access channels: an invitro study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of abutments with angled screw access channel on the retention of zirconia crowns. METHODS: Seven implant replicas were inserted in epoxy resin blocks. Fourteen zirconia crowns for central incisor tooth were digitally fabricated and cemented...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, Eman Assem, Khamis, Mohamed Moataz, Ezzelarab, Salah, Abdelhamid, Ahmed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03177-7
_version_ 1785069534783209472
author Ibrahim, Eman Assem
Khamis, Mohamed Moataz
Ezzelarab, Salah
Abdelhamid, Ahmed M.
author_facet Ibrahim, Eman Assem
Khamis, Mohamed Moataz
Ezzelarab, Salah
Abdelhamid, Ahmed M.
author_sort Ibrahim, Eman Assem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of abutments with angled screw access channel on the retention of zirconia crowns. METHODS: Seven implant replicas were inserted in epoxy resin blocks. Fourteen zirconia crowns for central incisor tooth were digitally fabricated and cemented to titanium bases (Ti-bases) with resin cement. Titanium bases were categorized into 2 groups (n = 7). Control group (Group STA) included straight screw access channel abutments. Study group (Group ASC) included angled screw access channel abutments. Following aging (5 °C-55 °C, 60 s; 250,000 cycles, 100 N, 1.67 Hz), the pull-off forces (N) were recorded by using retention test (1 mm/min). Types of failure were defined as (Type 1; Adhesive failure when luting agent predominantly remained on the Ti-base surface (> 90%); Type 2; Cohesive failure when luting agent remained on both Ti-base and crown surfaces; and Type 3; Adhesive failure when luting agent predominantly remained on the crown (> 90%). Statistical analysis was conducted by using (IBM SPSS version 28). Normality was checked by using Shapiro Wilk test and Q-Q plots. Independent t-test was then used to analogize the groups. RESULTS: Mean ± standard deviation of retention force records ranged from 1731.57 (63.68) N (group STA) to 1032.29 (89.82) N (group ASC), and there was a statistically significant variation between the 2 groups (P < .05). Failure modes were Type 2 for group STA and Type 3 for group ASC. CONCLUSIONS: The retention of zirconia crowns to abutments with a straight screw access channel is significantly higher than abutments with angled screw access channel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10326962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103269622023-07-08 Retention of zirconia crowns to titanium bases with straight versus angled screw access channels: an invitro study Ibrahim, Eman Assem Khamis, Mohamed Moataz Ezzelarab, Salah Abdelhamid, Ahmed M. BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of abutments with angled screw access channel on the retention of zirconia crowns. METHODS: Seven implant replicas were inserted in epoxy resin blocks. Fourteen zirconia crowns for central incisor tooth were digitally fabricated and cemented to titanium bases (Ti-bases) with resin cement. Titanium bases were categorized into 2 groups (n = 7). Control group (Group STA) included straight screw access channel abutments. Study group (Group ASC) included angled screw access channel abutments. Following aging (5 °C-55 °C, 60 s; 250,000 cycles, 100 N, 1.67 Hz), the pull-off forces (N) were recorded by using retention test (1 mm/min). Types of failure were defined as (Type 1; Adhesive failure when luting agent predominantly remained on the Ti-base surface (> 90%); Type 2; Cohesive failure when luting agent remained on both Ti-base and crown surfaces; and Type 3; Adhesive failure when luting agent predominantly remained on the crown (> 90%). Statistical analysis was conducted by using (IBM SPSS version 28). Normality was checked by using Shapiro Wilk test and Q-Q plots. Independent t-test was then used to analogize the groups. RESULTS: Mean ± standard deviation of retention force records ranged from 1731.57 (63.68) N (group STA) to 1032.29 (89.82) N (group ASC), and there was a statistically significant variation between the 2 groups (P < .05). Failure modes were Type 2 for group STA and Type 3 for group ASC. CONCLUSIONS: The retention of zirconia crowns to abutments with a straight screw access channel is significantly higher than abutments with angled screw access channel. BioMed Central 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10326962/ /pubmed/37420233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03177-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ibrahim, Eman Assem
Khamis, Mohamed Moataz
Ezzelarab, Salah
Abdelhamid, Ahmed M.
Retention of zirconia crowns to titanium bases with straight versus angled screw access channels: an invitro study
title Retention of zirconia crowns to titanium bases with straight versus angled screw access channels: an invitro study
title_full Retention of zirconia crowns to titanium bases with straight versus angled screw access channels: an invitro study
title_fullStr Retention of zirconia crowns to titanium bases with straight versus angled screw access channels: an invitro study
title_full_unstemmed Retention of zirconia crowns to titanium bases with straight versus angled screw access channels: an invitro study
title_short Retention of zirconia crowns to titanium bases with straight versus angled screw access channels: an invitro study
title_sort retention of zirconia crowns to titanium bases with straight versus angled screw access channels: an invitro study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10326962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03177-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimemanassem retentionofzirconiacrownstotitaniumbaseswithstraightversusangledscrewaccesschannelsaninvitrostudy
AT khamismohamedmoataz retentionofzirconiacrownstotitaniumbaseswithstraightversusangledscrewaccesschannelsaninvitrostudy
AT ezzelarabsalah retentionofzirconiacrownstotitaniumbaseswithstraightversusangledscrewaccesschannelsaninvitrostudy
AT abdelhamidahmedm retentionofzirconiacrownstotitaniumbaseswithstraightversusangledscrewaccesschannelsaninvitrostudy