Cargando…

Implicit reward-based motor learning

Binary feedback, providing information solely about task success or failure, can be sufficient to drive motor learning. While binary feedback can induce explicit adjustments in movement strategy, it remains unclear if this type of feedback also induce implicit learning. We examined this question in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Mastrigt, Nina M., Tsay, Jonathan S., Wang, Tianhe, Avraham, Guy, Abram, Sabrina J., van der Kooij, Katinka, Smeets, Jeroen B. J., Ivry, Richard B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.27.546738
_version_ 1785069553756143616
author van Mastrigt, Nina M.
Tsay, Jonathan S.
Wang, Tianhe
Avraham, Guy
Abram, Sabrina J.
van der Kooij, Katinka
Smeets, Jeroen B. J.
Ivry, Richard B.
author_facet van Mastrigt, Nina M.
Tsay, Jonathan S.
Wang, Tianhe
Avraham, Guy
Abram, Sabrina J.
van der Kooij, Katinka
Smeets, Jeroen B. J.
Ivry, Richard B.
author_sort van Mastrigt, Nina M.
collection PubMed
description Binary feedback, providing information solely about task success or failure, can be sufficient to drive motor learning. While binary feedback can induce explicit adjustments in movement strategy, it remains unclear if this type of feedback also induce implicit learning. We examined this question in a center-out reaching task by gradually moving an invisible reward zone away from a visual target to a final rotation of 7.5° or 25° in a between-group design. Participants received binary feedback, indicating if the movement intersected the reward zone. By the end of the training, both groups modified their reach angle by about 95% of the rotation. We quantified implicit learning by measuring performance in a subsequent no-feedback aftereffect phase, in which participants were told to forgo any adopted movement strategies and reach directly to the visual target. The results showed a small, but robust (2–3°) aftereffect in both groups, highlighting that binary feedback elicits implicit learning. Notably, for both groups, reaches to two flanking generalization targets were biased in the same direction as the aftereffect. This pattern is at odds with the hypothesis that implicit learning is a form of use-dependent learning. Rather, the results suggest that binary feedback can be sufficient to recalibrate a sensorimotor map.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10327077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103270772023-07-08 Implicit reward-based motor learning van Mastrigt, Nina M. Tsay, Jonathan S. Wang, Tianhe Avraham, Guy Abram, Sabrina J. van der Kooij, Katinka Smeets, Jeroen B. J. Ivry, Richard B. bioRxiv Article Binary feedback, providing information solely about task success or failure, can be sufficient to drive motor learning. While binary feedback can induce explicit adjustments in movement strategy, it remains unclear if this type of feedback also induce implicit learning. We examined this question in a center-out reaching task by gradually moving an invisible reward zone away from a visual target to a final rotation of 7.5° or 25° in a between-group design. Participants received binary feedback, indicating if the movement intersected the reward zone. By the end of the training, both groups modified their reach angle by about 95% of the rotation. We quantified implicit learning by measuring performance in a subsequent no-feedback aftereffect phase, in which participants were told to forgo any adopted movement strategies and reach directly to the visual target. The results showed a small, but robust (2–3°) aftereffect in both groups, highlighting that binary feedback elicits implicit learning. Notably, for both groups, reaches to two flanking generalization targets were biased in the same direction as the aftereffect. This pattern is at odds with the hypothesis that implicit learning is a form of use-dependent learning. Rather, the results suggest that binary feedback can be sufficient to recalibrate a sensorimotor map. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10327077/ /pubmed/37425740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.27.546738 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
van Mastrigt, Nina M.
Tsay, Jonathan S.
Wang, Tianhe
Avraham, Guy
Abram, Sabrina J.
van der Kooij, Katinka
Smeets, Jeroen B. J.
Ivry, Richard B.
Implicit reward-based motor learning
title Implicit reward-based motor learning
title_full Implicit reward-based motor learning
title_fullStr Implicit reward-based motor learning
title_full_unstemmed Implicit reward-based motor learning
title_short Implicit reward-based motor learning
title_sort implicit reward-based motor learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.27.546738
work_keys_str_mv AT vanmastrigtninam implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning
AT tsayjonathans implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning
AT wangtianhe implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning
AT avrahamguy implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning
AT abramsabrinaj implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning
AT vanderkooijkatinka implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning
AT smeetsjeroenbj implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning
AT ivryrichardb implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning