Cargando…
Implicit reward-based motor learning
Binary feedback, providing information solely about task success or failure, can be sufficient to drive motor learning. While binary feedback can induce explicit adjustments in movement strategy, it remains unclear if this type of feedback also induce implicit learning. We examined this question in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.27.546738 |
_version_ | 1785069553756143616 |
---|---|
author | van Mastrigt, Nina M. Tsay, Jonathan S. Wang, Tianhe Avraham, Guy Abram, Sabrina J. van der Kooij, Katinka Smeets, Jeroen B. J. Ivry, Richard B. |
author_facet | van Mastrigt, Nina M. Tsay, Jonathan S. Wang, Tianhe Avraham, Guy Abram, Sabrina J. van der Kooij, Katinka Smeets, Jeroen B. J. Ivry, Richard B. |
author_sort | van Mastrigt, Nina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Binary feedback, providing information solely about task success or failure, can be sufficient to drive motor learning. While binary feedback can induce explicit adjustments in movement strategy, it remains unclear if this type of feedback also induce implicit learning. We examined this question in a center-out reaching task by gradually moving an invisible reward zone away from a visual target to a final rotation of 7.5° or 25° in a between-group design. Participants received binary feedback, indicating if the movement intersected the reward zone. By the end of the training, both groups modified their reach angle by about 95% of the rotation. We quantified implicit learning by measuring performance in a subsequent no-feedback aftereffect phase, in which participants were told to forgo any adopted movement strategies and reach directly to the visual target. The results showed a small, but robust (2–3°) aftereffect in both groups, highlighting that binary feedback elicits implicit learning. Notably, for both groups, reaches to two flanking generalization targets were biased in the same direction as the aftereffect. This pattern is at odds with the hypothesis that implicit learning is a form of use-dependent learning. Rather, the results suggest that binary feedback can be sufficient to recalibrate a sensorimotor map. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10327077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103270772023-07-08 Implicit reward-based motor learning van Mastrigt, Nina M. Tsay, Jonathan S. Wang, Tianhe Avraham, Guy Abram, Sabrina J. van der Kooij, Katinka Smeets, Jeroen B. J. Ivry, Richard B. bioRxiv Article Binary feedback, providing information solely about task success or failure, can be sufficient to drive motor learning. While binary feedback can induce explicit adjustments in movement strategy, it remains unclear if this type of feedback also induce implicit learning. We examined this question in a center-out reaching task by gradually moving an invisible reward zone away from a visual target to a final rotation of 7.5° or 25° in a between-group design. Participants received binary feedback, indicating if the movement intersected the reward zone. By the end of the training, both groups modified their reach angle by about 95% of the rotation. We quantified implicit learning by measuring performance in a subsequent no-feedback aftereffect phase, in which participants were told to forgo any adopted movement strategies and reach directly to the visual target. The results showed a small, but robust (2–3°) aftereffect in both groups, highlighting that binary feedback elicits implicit learning. Notably, for both groups, reaches to two flanking generalization targets were biased in the same direction as the aftereffect. This pattern is at odds with the hypothesis that implicit learning is a form of use-dependent learning. Rather, the results suggest that binary feedback can be sufficient to recalibrate a sensorimotor map. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10327077/ /pubmed/37425740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.27.546738 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. |
spellingShingle | Article van Mastrigt, Nina M. Tsay, Jonathan S. Wang, Tianhe Avraham, Guy Abram, Sabrina J. van der Kooij, Katinka Smeets, Jeroen B. J. Ivry, Richard B. Implicit reward-based motor learning |
title | Implicit reward-based motor learning |
title_full | Implicit reward-based motor learning |
title_fullStr | Implicit reward-based motor learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Implicit reward-based motor learning |
title_short | Implicit reward-based motor learning |
title_sort | implicit reward-based motor learning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.27.546738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanmastrigtninam implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning AT tsayjonathans implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning AT wangtianhe implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning AT avrahamguy implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning AT abramsabrinaj implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning AT vanderkooijkatinka implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning AT smeetsjeroenbj implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning AT ivryrichardb implicitrewardbasedmotorlearning |