Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 virologic rebound with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir therapy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of replication-competent virologic rebound with and without nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment for acute COVID-19. Secondary aims were to estimate the validity of symptoms to detect rebound and the incidence of emergent nirmatrelvir-resistance mutations after reboun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edelstein, Gregory E., Boucau, Julie, Uddin, Rockib, Marino, Caitlin, Liew, May Y., Barry, Mamadou, Choudhary, Manish C., Gilbert, Rebecca F., Reynolds, Zahra, Li, Yijia, Tien, Dessie, Sagar, Shruti, Vyas, Tammy D., Kawano, Yumeko, Sparks, Jeffrey A., Hammond, Sarah P., Wallace, Zachary, Vyas, Jatin M., Barczak, Amy K., Lemieux, Jacob E., Li, Jonathan Z., Siedner, Mark J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.23.23288598
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of replication-competent virologic rebound with and without nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment for acute COVID-19. Secondary aims were to estimate the validity of symptoms to detect rebound and the incidence of emergent nirmatrelvir-resistance mutations after rebound. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Multicenter healthcare system in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled ambulatory adults with a positive COVID-19 test and/or a prescription for nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. EXPOSURES: Receipt of 5 days of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment versus no COVID-19 therapy. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was COVID-19 virologic rebound, defined as either (1) a positive SARS-CoV-2 viral culture following a prior negative culture or (2) two consecutive viral loads ≥4.0 log(10) copies/milliliter after a prior reduction in viral load to <4.0 log(10) copies/milliliter. RESULTS: Compared with untreated individuals (n=55), those taking nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (n=72) were older, received more COVID-19 vaccinations, and were more commonly immunosuppressed. Fifteen individuals (20.8%) taking nirmatrelvir-ritonavir experienced virologic rebound versus one (1.8%) of the untreated (absolute difference 19.0% [95%CI 9.0–29.0%], P=0.001). In multivariable models, only N-R was associated with VR (AOR 10.02, 95%CI 1.13–88.74). VR occurred more commonly among those with earlier nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiation (29.0%, 16.7% and 0% when initiated days 0, 1, and ≥2 after diagnosis, respectively, P=0.089). Among participants on N-R, those experiencing rebound had prolonged shedding of replication-competent virus compared to those that did not rebound (median: 14 vs 3 days). Only 8/16 with virologic rebound reported worsening symptoms (50%, 95%CI 25%−75%); 2 were completely asymptomatic. We detected no post-rebound nirmatrelvir-resistance mutations in the NSP5 protease gene. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Virologic rebound occurred in approximately one in five people taking nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and often occurred without worsening symptoms. Because it is associated with replication-competent viral shedding, close monitoring and potential isolation of those who rebound should be considered.