Cargando…

Development and validation of the creatinine clearance predictor machine learning models in critically ill adults

BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients, measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) is the most reliable method to evaluate glomerular filtration rate in routine clinical practice and may vary subsequently on a day-to-day basis. We developed and externally validated models to predict CrCl one day ahead and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Chao-Yuan, Güiza, Fabian, Wouters, Pieter, Mebis, Liese, Carra, Giorgia, Gunst, Jan, Meersseman, Philippe, Casaer, Michael, Van den Berghe, Greet, De Vlieger, Greet, Meyfroidt, Geert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04553-z
_version_ 1785069610350936064
author Huang, Chao-Yuan
Güiza, Fabian
Wouters, Pieter
Mebis, Liese
Carra, Giorgia
Gunst, Jan
Meersseman, Philippe
Casaer, Michael
Van den Berghe, Greet
De Vlieger, Greet
Meyfroidt, Geert
author_facet Huang, Chao-Yuan
Güiza, Fabian
Wouters, Pieter
Mebis, Liese
Carra, Giorgia
Gunst, Jan
Meersseman, Philippe
Casaer, Michael
Van den Berghe, Greet
De Vlieger, Greet
Meyfroidt, Geert
author_sort Huang, Chao-Yuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients, measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) is the most reliable method to evaluate glomerular filtration rate in routine clinical practice and may vary subsequently on a day-to-day basis. We developed and externally validated models to predict CrCl one day ahead and compared them with a reference reflecting current clinical practice. METHODS: A gradient boosting method (GBM) machine-learning algorithm was used to develop the models on data from 2825 patients from the EPaNIC multicenter randomized controlled trial database. We externally validated the models on 9576 patients from the University Hospitals Leuven, included in the M@tric database. Three models were developed: a “Core” model based on demographic, admission diagnosis, and daily laboratory results; a “Core + BGA” model adding blood gas analysis results; and a “Core + BGA + Monitoring” model also including high-resolution monitoring data. Model performance was evaluated against the actual CrCl by mean absolute error (MAE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE). RESULTS: All three developed models showed smaller prediction errors than the reference. Assuming the same CrCl of the day of prediction showed 20.6 (95% CI 20.3–20.9) ml/min MAE and 40.1 (95% CI 37.9–42.3) ml/min RMSE in the external validation cohort, while the developed model having the smallest RMSE (the Core + BGA + Monitoring model) had 18.1 (95% CI 17.9–18.3) ml/min MAE and 28.9 (95% CI 28–29.7) ml/min RMSE. CONCLUSIONS: Prediction models based on routinely collected clinical data in the ICU were able to accurately predict next-day CrCl. These models could be useful for hydrophilic drug dosage adjustment or stratification of patients at risk. Trial registration. Not applicable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04553-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10327364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103273642023-07-08 Development and validation of the creatinine clearance predictor machine learning models in critically ill adults Huang, Chao-Yuan Güiza, Fabian Wouters, Pieter Mebis, Liese Carra, Giorgia Gunst, Jan Meersseman, Philippe Casaer, Michael Van den Berghe, Greet De Vlieger, Greet Meyfroidt, Geert Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients, measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) is the most reliable method to evaluate glomerular filtration rate in routine clinical practice and may vary subsequently on a day-to-day basis. We developed and externally validated models to predict CrCl one day ahead and compared them with a reference reflecting current clinical practice. METHODS: A gradient boosting method (GBM) machine-learning algorithm was used to develop the models on data from 2825 patients from the EPaNIC multicenter randomized controlled trial database. We externally validated the models on 9576 patients from the University Hospitals Leuven, included in the M@tric database. Three models were developed: a “Core” model based on demographic, admission diagnosis, and daily laboratory results; a “Core + BGA” model adding blood gas analysis results; and a “Core + BGA + Monitoring” model also including high-resolution monitoring data. Model performance was evaluated against the actual CrCl by mean absolute error (MAE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE). RESULTS: All three developed models showed smaller prediction errors than the reference. Assuming the same CrCl of the day of prediction showed 20.6 (95% CI 20.3–20.9) ml/min MAE and 40.1 (95% CI 37.9–42.3) ml/min RMSE in the external validation cohort, while the developed model having the smallest RMSE (the Core + BGA + Monitoring model) had 18.1 (95% CI 17.9–18.3) ml/min MAE and 28.9 (95% CI 28–29.7) ml/min RMSE. CONCLUSIONS: Prediction models based on routinely collected clinical data in the ICU were able to accurately predict next-day CrCl. These models could be useful for hydrophilic drug dosage adjustment or stratification of patients at risk. Trial registration. Not applicable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04553-z. BioMed Central 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10327364/ /pubmed/37415234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04553-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Huang, Chao-Yuan
Güiza, Fabian
Wouters, Pieter
Mebis, Liese
Carra, Giorgia
Gunst, Jan
Meersseman, Philippe
Casaer, Michael
Van den Berghe, Greet
De Vlieger, Greet
Meyfroidt, Geert
Development and validation of the creatinine clearance predictor machine learning models in critically ill adults
title Development and validation of the creatinine clearance predictor machine learning models in critically ill adults
title_full Development and validation of the creatinine clearance predictor machine learning models in critically ill adults
title_fullStr Development and validation of the creatinine clearance predictor machine learning models in critically ill adults
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the creatinine clearance predictor machine learning models in critically ill adults
title_short Development and validation of the creatinine clearance predictor machine learning models in critically ill adults
title_sort development and validation of the creatinine clearance predictor machine learning models in critically ill adults
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04553-z
work_keys_str_mv AT huangchaoyuan developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults
AT guizafabian developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults
AT wouterspieter developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults
AT mebisliese developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults
AT carragiorgia developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults
AT gunstjan developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults
AT meerssemanphilippe developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults
AT casaermichael developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults
AT vandenberghegreet developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults
AT devliegergreet developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults
AT meyfroidtgeert developmentandvalidationofthecreatinineclearancepredictormachinelearningmodelsincriticallyilladults