Cargando…
The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review
CONTEXT: Participatory systems mapping is increasingly used to gain insight into the complex systems surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors. OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesize studies that used participatory systems mapping in the context of non-communicable diseases...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7 |
_version_ | 1785069613722107904 |
---|---|
author | van den Akker, Amber Fabbri, Alice Alardah, Dima I. Gilmore, Anna B. Rutter, Harry |
author_facet | van den Akker, Amber Fabbri, Alice Alardah, Dima I. Gilmore, Anna B. Rutter, Harry |
author_sort | van den Akker, Amber |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Participatory systems mapping is increasingly used to gain insight into the complex systems surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors. OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesize studies that used participatory systems mapping in the context of non-communicable diseases. DESIGN: Scoping review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that focused on NCDs and/or related risk factors, and included participants at any stage of their system’s mapping process, were included. CATEGORIES FOR ANALYSIS: The main categories for analysis were: (1) problem definition and goal-setting, (2) participant involvement, (3) structure of the mapping process, (4) validation of the systems map, and (5) evaluation of the mapping process. RESULTS: We identified 57 studies that used participatory systems mapping for a variety of purposes, including to inform or evaluate policies or interventions and to identify potential leverage points within a system. The number of participants ranged from 6 to 590. While policymakers and professionals were the stakeholder groups most often included, some studies described significant added value from including marginalized communities. There was a general lack of formal evaluation in most studies. However, reported benefits related mostly to individual and group learning, whereas limitations described included a lack of concrete actions following from systems mapping exercises. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this review, we argue that research using participatory systems mapping would benefit from considering three different but intertwined actions: explicitly considering how different participants and the power imbalances between them may influence the participatory process, considering how the results from a systems mapping exercise may effectively inform policy or translate into action, and including and reporting on evaluation and outcomes of the process, wherever possible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10327378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103273782023-07-08 The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review van den Akker, Amber Fabbri, Alice Alardah, Dima I. Gilmore, Anna B. Rutter, Harry Health Res Policy Syst Review CONTEXT: Participatory systems mapping is increasingly used to gain insight into the complex systems surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors. OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesize studies that used participatory systems mapping in the context of non-communicable diseases. DESIGN: Scoping review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that focused on NCDs and/or related risk factors, and included participants at any stage of their system’s mapping process, were included. CATEGORIES FOR ANALYSIS: The main categories for analysis were: (1) problem definition and goal-setting, (2) participant involvement, (3) structure of the mapping process, (4) validation of the systems map, and (5) evaluation of the mapping process. RESULTS: We identified 57 studies that used participatory systems mapping for a variety of purposes, including to inform or evaluate policies or interventions and to identify potential leverage points within a system. The number of participants ranged from 6 to 590. While policymakers and professionals were the stakeholder groups most often included, some studies described significant added value from including marginalized communities. There was a general lack of formal evaluation in most studies. However, reported benefits related mostly to individual and group learning, whereas limitations described included a lack of concrete actions following from systems mapping exercises. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this review, we argue that research using participatory systems mapping would benefit from considering three different but intertwined actions: explicitly considering how different participants and the power imbalances between them may influence the participatory process, considering how the results from a systems mapping exercise may effectively inform policy or translate into action, and including and reporting on evaluation and outcomes of the process, wherever possible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7. BioMed Central 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10327378/ /pubmed/37415182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review van den Akker, Amber Fabbri, Alice Alardah, Dima I. Gilmore, Anna B. Rutter, Harry The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review |
title | The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review |
title_full | The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review |
title_short | The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review |
title_sort | use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenakkeramber theuseofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview AT fabbrialice theuseofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview AT alardahdimai theuseofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview AT gilmoreannab theuseofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview AT rutterharry theuseofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview AT vandenakkeramber useofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview AT fabbrialice useofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview AT alardahdimai useofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview AT gilmoreannab useofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview AT rutterharry useofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview |