Cargando…

The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review

CONTEXT: Participatory systems mapping is increasingly used to gain insight into the complex systems surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors. OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesize studies that used participatory systems mapping in the context of non-communicable diseases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Akker, Amber, Fabbri, Alice, Alardah, Dima I., Gilmore, Anna B., Rutter, Harry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7
_version_ 1785069613722107904
author van den Akker, Amber
Fabbri, Alice
Alardah, Dima I.
Gilmore, Anna B.
Rutter, Harry
author_facet van den Akker, Amber
Fabbri, Alice
Alardah, Dima I.
Gilmore, Anna B.
Rutter, Harry
author_sort van den Akker, Amber
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Participatory systems mapping is increasingly used to gain insight into the complex systems surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors. OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesize studies that used participatory systems mapping in the context of non-communicable diseases. DESIGN: Scoping review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that focused on NCDs and/or related risk factors, and included participants at any stage of their system’s mapping process, were included. CATEGORIES FOR ANALYSIS: The main categories for analysis were: (1) problem definition and goal-setting, (2) participant involvement, (3) structure of the mapping process, (4) validation of the systems map, and (5) evaluation of the mapping process. RESULTS: We identified 57 studies that used participatory systems mapping for a variety of purposes, including to inform or evaluate policies or interventions and to identify potential leverage points within a system. The number of participants ranged from 6 to 590. While policymakers and professionals were the stakeholder groups most often included, some studies described significant added value from including marginalized communities. There was a general lack of formal evaluation in most studies. However, reported benefits related mostly to individual and group learning, whereas limitations described included a lack of concrete actions following from systems mapping exercises. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this review, we argue that research using participatory systems mapping would benefit from considering three different but intertwined actions: explicitly considering how different participants and the power imbalances between them may influence the participatory process, considering how the results from a systems mapping exercise may effectively inform policy or translate into action, and including and reporting on evaluation and outcomes of the process, wherever possible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10327378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103273782023-07-08 The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review van den Akker, Amber Fabbri, Alice Alardah, Dima I. Gilmore, Anna B. Rutter, Harry Health Res Policy Syst Review CONTEXT: Participatory systems mapping is increasingly used to gain insight into the complex systems surrounding non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors. OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesize studies that used participatory systems mapping in the context of non-communicable diseases. DESIGN: Scoping review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that focused on NCDs and/or related risk factors, and included participants at any stage of their system’s mapping process, were included. CATEGORIES FOR ANALYSIS: The main categories for analysis were: (1) problem definition and goal-setting, (2) participant involvement, (3) structure of the mapping process, (4) validation of the systems map, and (5) evaluation of the mapping process. RESULTS: We identified 57 studies that used participatory systems mapping for a variety of purposes, including to inform or evaluate policies or interventions and to identify potential leverage points within a system. The number of participants ranged from 6 to 590. While policymakers and professionals were the stakeholder groups most often included, some studies described significant added value from including marginalized communities. There was a general lack of formal evaluation in most studies. However, reported benefits related mostly to individual and group learning, whereas limitations described included a lack of concrete actions following from systems mapping exercises. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this review, we argue that research using participatory systems mapping would benefit from considering three different but intertwined actions: explicitly considering how different participants and the power imbalances between them may influence the participatory process, considering how the results from a systems mapping exercise may effectively inform policy or translate into action, and including and reporting on evaluation and outcomes of the process, wherever possible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7. BioMed Central 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10327378/ /pubmed/37415182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
van den Akker, Amber
Fabbri, Alice
Alardah, Dima I.
Gilmore, Anna B.
Rutter, Harry
The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review
title The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review
title_full The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review
title_fullStr The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review
title_short The use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review
title_sort use of participatory systems mapping as a research method in the context of non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01020-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenakkeramber theuseofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview
AT fabbrialice theuseofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview
AT alardahdimai theuseofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview
AT gilmoreannab theuseofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview
AT rutterharry theuseofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview
AT vandenakkeramber useofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview
AT fabbrialice useofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview
AT alardahdimai useofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview
AT gilmoreannab useofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview
AT rutterharry useofparticipatorysystemsmappingasaresearchmethodinthecontextofnoncommunicablediseasesandriskfactorsascopingreview