Cargando…

Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT

BACKGROUD: To predict the malignancy of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) by machine learning (ML) on CT images using three models - Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT). METHODS: 231 patients from Center 1 were randomly assigne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Cui, Wang, Jian, Yang, Yang, Dai, Bailing, Xu, Zhihua, Zhu, Fangmei, Yu, Huajun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01053-y
_version_ 1785069617008345088
author Zhang, Cui
Wang, Jian
Yang, Yang
Dai, Bailing
Xu, Zhihua
Zhu, Fangmei
Yu, Huajun
author_facet Zhang, Cui
Wang, Jian
Yang, Yang
Dai, Bailing
Xu, Zhihua
Zhu, Fangmei
Yu, Huajun
author_sort Zhang, Cui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUD: To predict the malignancy of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) by machine learning (ML) on CT images using three models - Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT). METHODS: 231 patients from Center 1 were randomly assigned into the training cohort (n = 161) and the internal validation cohort (n = 70) in a 7:3 ratio. The other 78 patients from Center 2 served as the external test cohort. Scikit-learn software was used to build three classifiers. The performance of the three models were evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC). Diagnostic differences between ML models and radiologists were compared in the external test cohort. Important features of LR and GBDT were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: GBDT outperformed LR and DT with the largest AUC values (0.981 and 0.815) in the training and internal validation cohorts and the greatest accuracy (0.923, 0.833 and 0.844) across all three cohorts. However, LR was found to have the largest AUC value (0.910) in the external test cohort. DT yielded the worst accuracy (0.790 and 0.727) and AUC values (0.803 and 0.700) in both the internal validation cohort and the external test cohort. GBDT and LR performed better than radiologists. Long diameter was demonstrated to be the same and most important CT feature for GBDT and LR. CONCLUSIONS: ML classifiers, especially GBDT and LR with high accuracy and strong robustness, were considered to be promising in risk classification of 1–5 cm gastric GISTs based on CT. Long diameter was found the most important feature for risk stratification. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-023-01053-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10327391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103273912023-07-08 Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT Zhang, Cui Wang, Jian Yang, Yang Dai, Bailing Xu, Zhihua Zhu, Fangmei Yu, Huajun BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUD: To predict the malignancy of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) by machine learning (ML) on CT images using three models - Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT). METHODS: 231 patients from Center 1 were randomly assigned into the training cohort (n = 161) and the internal validation cohort (n = 70) in a 7:3 ratio. The other 78 patients from Center 2 served as the external test cohort. Scikit-learn software was used to build three classifiers. The performance of the three models were evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC). Diagnostic differences between ML models and radiologists were compared in the external test cohort. Important features of LR and GBDT were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: GBDT outperformed LR and DT with the largest AUC values (0.981 and 0.815) in the training and internal validation cohorts and the greatest accuracy (0.923, 0.833 and 0.844) across all three cohorts. However, LR was found to have the largest AUC value (0.910) in the external test cohort. DT yielded the worst accuracy (0.790 and 0.727) and AUC values (0.803 and 0.700) in both the internal validation cohort and the external test cohort. GBDT and LR performed better than radiologists. Long diameter was demonstrated to be the same and most important CT feature for GBDT and LR. CONCLUSIONS: ML classifiers, especially GBDT and LR with high accuracy and strong robustness, were considered to be promising in risk classification of 1–5 cm gastric GISTs based on CT. Long diameter was found the most important feature for risk stratification. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-023-01053-y. BioMed Central 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10327391/ /pubmed/37415125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01053-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Cui
Wang, Jian
Yang, Yang
Dai, Bailing
Xu, Zhihua
Zhu, Fangmei
Yu, Huajun
Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT
title Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT
title_full Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT
title_fullStr Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT
title_short Machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on CT
title_sort machine learning for predicting the risk stratification of 1–5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on ct
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37415125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01053-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangcui machinelearningforpredictingtheriskstratificationof15cmgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorsbasedonct
AT wangjian machinelearningforpredictingtheriskstratificationof15cmgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorsbasedonct
AT yangyang machinelearningforpredictingtheriskstratificationof15cmgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorsbasedonct
AT daibailing machinelearningforpredictingtheriskstratificationof15cmgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorsbasedonct
AT xuzhihua machinelearningforpredictingtheriskstratificationof15cmgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorsbasedonct
AT zhufangmei machinelearningforpredictingtheriskstratificationof15cmgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorsbasedonct
AT yuhuajun machinelearningforpredictingtheriskstratificationof15cmgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumorsbasedonct