Cargando…

Use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the appropriateness of valproate prescribing indicators in England and Wales as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate use among women and girls of childbearing potential between health communities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Cross-sectional study using an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Andrew, Hinchliffe, Anne, Hood, Kerenza, Carson Stevens, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000022
_version_ 1785069631509102592
author Evans, Andrew
Hinchliffe, Anne
Hood, Kerenza
Carson Stevens, Andrew
author_facet Evans, Andrew
Hinchliffe, Anne
Hood, Kerenza
Carson Stevens, Andrew
author_sort Evans, Andrew
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the appropriateness of valproate prescribing indicators in England and Wales as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate use among women and girls of childbearing potential between health communities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Cross-sectional study using an ecological design using routinely published, publicly available valproate prescribing data for the period January to March 2019 and 2018 mid-year population estimates. RESULTS: In England and Wales, 87.7 people in every 1000 people prescribed valproate were women or girls aged 14–45 years (range 60.4–133.2). The prevalence of valproate use among all women and girls of childbearing age was 1.49 cases per 1000 women and girls aged 14–45 years (range 0.47–3.13). Considerable variation in prevalence was observed depending on which of two measures was used. The relative risk of exposure between health communities increased from 2.2 to 6.6 depending on the measure used, leading to the identification of different health communities being a priority for action. Wide variation was observed in the prevalence of valproate use among individuals other than women and girls aged 14–45 years (mean prevalence 3.89 cases per 1000 population, range 2.42–7.78). The prevalence of valproate use in all Clinical Commissioning Groups and Local Health Boards was lower in the at-risk population than in the rest of the population (p=0.046) with a strong positive correlation observed between the prevalence of valproate use in these two groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Current indicators may lead to a failure to systematically review women and girls of childbearing age prescribed valproate. Urgent consideration should be given to changing the indicators used in England and Wales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10327459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103274592023-07-12 Use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study Evans, Andrew Hinchliffe, Anne Hood, Kerenza Carson Stevens, Andrew Integr Healthc J Original Research OBJECTIVE: To determine the appropriateness of valproate prescribing indicators in England and Wales as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate use among women and girls of childbearing potential between health communities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Cross-sectional study using an ecological design using routinely published, publicly available valproate prescribing data for the period January to March 2019 and 2018 mid-year population estimates. RESULTS: In England and Wales, 87.7 people in every 1000 people prescribed valproate were women or girls aged 14–45 years (range 60.4–133.2). The prevalence of valproate use among all women and girls of childbearing age was 1.49 cases per 1000 women and girls aged 14–45 years (range 0.47–3.13). Considerable variation in prevalence was observed depending on which of two measures was used. The relative risk of exposure between health communities increased from 2.2 to 6.6 depending on the measure used, leading to the identification of different health communities being a priority for action. Wide variation was observed in the prevalence of valproate use among individuals other than women and girls aged 14–45 years (mean prevalence 3.89 cases per 1000 population, range 2.42–7.78). The prevalence of valproate use in all Clinical Commissioning Groups and Local Health Boards was lower in the at-risk population than in the rest of the population (p=0.046) with a strong positive correlation observed between the prevalence of valproate use in these two groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Current indicators may lead to a failure to systematically review women and girls of childbearing age prescribed valproate. Urgent consideration should be given to changing the indicators used in England and Wales. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10327459/ /pubmed/37441310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000022 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Evans, Andrew
Hinchliffe, Anne
Hood, Kerenza
Carson Stevens, Andrew
Use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study
title Use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study
title_full Use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study
title_short Use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study
title_sort use of prescribing indicators as a means of identifying variation in the prevalence of valproate prescribing between health communities: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000022
work_keys_str_mv AT evansandrew useofprescribingindicatorsasameansofidentifyingvariationintheprevalenceofvalproateprescribingbetweenhealthcommunitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT hinchliffeanne useofprescribingindicatorsasameansofidentifyingvariationintheprevalenceofvalproateprescribingbetweenhealthcommunitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT hoodkerenza useofprescribingindicatorsasameansofidentifyingvariationintheprevalenceofvalproateprescribingbetweenhealthcommunitiesacrosssectionalstudy
AT carsonstevensandrew useofprescribingindicatorsasameansofidentifyingvariationintheprevalenceofvalproateprescribingbetweenhealthcommunitiesacrosssectionalstudy