Cargando…
Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework
Intervention research and development for youth in the juvenile legal system (JLS) has often focused on recidivism as the primary outcome of interest. Although recidivism is an important outcome, it is ultimately a downstream marker of success and is affected by changes in other domains of youths’ l...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177568 |
_version_ | 1785069652323336192 |
---|---|
author | Sheerin, Kaitlin M. Brodell, Regina Huey, Stanley J. Kemp, Kathleen A. |
author_facet | Sheerin, Kaitlin M. Brodell, Regina Huey, Stanley J. Kemp, Kathleen A. |
author_sort | Sheerin, Kaitlin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intervention research and development for youth in the juvenile legal system (JLS) has often focused on recidivism as the primary outcome of interest. Although recidivism is an important outcome, it is ultimately a downstream marker of success and is affected by changes in other domains of youths’ lives (e.g., family and peer relations, neighborhood safety, local and state-level policies). Thus, the present manuscript proposes the application of ecological systems theory to selecting outcomes to assess intervention effects in JLS intervention research to better capture proximal and distal influences on youth behavior. To that end, we first provide an overview of the strengths and limitations of using recidivism as an outcome measure. Next, the current application of social ecology theory to existing research on both risk and protective factors of JLS involvement is discussed, as well as existing work on assessing social-ecological domains within intervention studies. Then, a measurement framework is introduced for selecting pertinent domains of youths’ social ecologies to assess as intervention outcomes, moderators, and mediators. To facilitate this, we provide examples of concrete constructs and measures that researchers may select. We conclude with potential new avenues of research to which our proposed framework could lead, as well as potential limitations of implementing our framework. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10327555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103275552023-07-08 Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework Sheerin, Kaitlin M. Brodell, Regina Huey, Stanley J. Kemp, Kathleen A. Front Psychol Psychology Intervention research and development for youth in the juvenile legal system (JLS) has often focused on recidivism as the primary outcome of interest. Although recidivism is an important outcome, it is ultimately a downstream marker of success and is affected by changes in other domains of youths’ lives (e.g., family and peer relations, neighborhood safety, local and state-level policies). Thus, the present manuscript proposes the application of ecological systems theory to selecting outcomes to assess intervention effects in JLS intervention research to better capture proximal and distal influences on youth behavior. To that end, we first provide an overview of the strengths and limitations of using recidivism as an outcome measure. Next, the current application of social ecology theory to existing research on both risk and protective factors of JLS involvement is discussed, as well as existing work on assessing social-ecological domains within intervention studies. Then, a measurement framework is introduced for selecting pertinent domains of youths’ social ecologies to assess as intervention outcomes, moderators, and mediators. To facilitate this, we provide examples of concrete constructs and measures that researchers may select. We conclude with potential new avenues of research to which our proposed framework could lead, as well as potential limitations of implementing our framework. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10327555/ /pubmed/37425162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177568 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sheerin, Brodell, Huey and Kemp. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Sheerin, Kaitlin M. Brodell, Regina Huey, Stanley J. Kemp, Kathleen A. Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework |
title | Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework |
title_full | Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework |
title_fullStr | Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework |
title_short | Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework |
title_sort | applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sheerinkaitlinm applyingecologicalsystemstheorytojuvenilelegalsysteminterventionsoutcomesresearchameasurementframework AT brodellregina applyingecologicalsystemstheorytojuvenilelegalsysteminterventionsoutcomesresearchameasurementframework AT hueystanleyj applyingecologicalsystemstheorytojuvenilelegalsysteminterventionsoutcomesresearchameasurementframework AT kempkathleena applyingecologicalsystemstheorytojuvenilelegalsysteminterventionsoutcomesresearchameasurementframework |