Cargando…

Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework

Intervention research and development for youth in the juvenile legal system (JLS) has often focused on recidivism as the primary outcome of interest. Although recidivism is an important outcome, it is ultimately a downstream marker of success and is affected by changes in other domains of youths’ l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheerin, Kaitlin M., Brodell, Regina, Huey, Stanley J., Kemp, Kathleen A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425162
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177568
_version_ 1785069652323336192
author Sheerin, Kaitlin M.
Brodell, Regina
Huey, Stanley J.
Kemp, Kathleen A.
author_facet Sheerin, Kaitlin M.
Brodell, Regina
Huey, Stanley J.
Kemp, Kathleen A.
author_sort Sheerin, Kaitlin M.
collection PubMed
description Intervention research and development for youth in the juvenile legal system (JLS) has often focused on recidivism as the primary outcome of interest. Although recidivism is an important outcome, it is ultimately a downstream marker of success and is affected by changes in other domains of youths’ lives (e.g., family and peer relations, neighborhood safety, local and state-level policies). Thus, the present manuscript proposes the application of ecological systems theory to selecting outcomes to assess intervention effects in JLS intervention research to better capture proximal and distal influences on youth behavior. To that end, we first provide an overview of the strengths and limitations of using recidivism as an outcome measure. Next, the current application of social ecology theory to existing research on both risk and protective factors of JLS involvement is discussed, as well as existing work on assessing social-ecological domains within intervention studies. Then, a measurement framework is introduced for selecting pertinent domains of youths’ social ecologies to assess as intervention outcomes, moderators, and mediators. To facilitate this, we provide examples of concrete constructs and measures that researchers may select. We conclude with potential new avenues of research to which our proposed framework could lead, as well as potential limitations of implementing our framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10327555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103275552023-07-08 Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework Sheerin, Kaitlin M. Brodell, Regina Huey, Stanley J. Kemp, Kathleen A. Front Psychol Psychology Intervention research and development for youth in the juvenile legal system (JLS) has often focused on recidivism as the primary outcome of interest. Although recidivism is an important outcome, it is ultimately a downstream marker of success and is affected by changes in other domains of youths’ lives (e.g., family and peer relations, neighborhood safety, local and state-level policies). Thus, the present manuscript proposes the application of ecological systems theory to selecting outcomes to assess intervention effects in JLS intervention research to better capture proximal and distal influences on youth behavior. To that end, we first provide an overview of the strengths and limitations of using recidivism as an outcome measure. Next, the current application of social ecology theory to existing research on both risk and protective factors of JLS involvement is discussed, as well as existing work on assessing social-ecological domains within intervention studies. Then, a measurement framework is introduced for selecting pertinent domains of youths’ social ecologies to assess as intervention outcomes, moderators, and mediators. To facilitate this, we provide examples of concrete constructs and measures that researchers may select. We conclude with potential new avenues of research to which our proposed framework could lead, as well as potential limitations of implementing our framework. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10327555/ /pubmed/37425162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177568 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sheerin, Brodell, Huey and Kemp. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Sheerin, Kaitlin M.
Brodell, Regina
Huey, Stanley J.
Kemp, Kathleen A.
Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework
title Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework
title_full Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework
title_fullStr Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework
title_full_unstemmed Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework
title_short Applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework
title_sort applying ecological systems theory to juvenile legal system interventions outcomes research: a measurement framework
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425162
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177568
work_keys_str_mv AT sheerinkaitlinm applyingecologicalsystemstheorytojuvenilelegalsysteminterventionsoutcomesresearchameasurementframework
AT brodellregina applyingecologicalsystemstheorytojuvenilelegalsysteminterventionsoutcomesresearchameasurementframework
AT hueystanleyj applyingecologicalsystemstheorytojuvenilelegalsysteminterventionsoutcomesresearchameasurementframework
AT kempkathleena applyingecologicalsystemstheorytojuvenilelegalsysteminterventionsoutcomesresearchameasurementframework