Cargando…

Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023)

In a healthy scientific community, theories influence each other and promising ideas are embraced by competing theoretical camps. We are therefore pleased that Theeuwes (2023) now agrees with core points of our theoretical position (Liesefeld et al., 2021; Liesefeld & Müller, 2020), most notably...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liesefeld, Heinrich R., Müller, Hermann J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426059
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.279
_version_ 1785069688133255168
author Liesefeld, Heinrich R.
Müller, Hermann J.
author_facet Liesefeld, Heinrich R.
Müller, Hermann J.
author_sort Liesefeld, Heinrich R.
collection PubMed
description In a healthy scientific community, theories influence each other and promising ideas are embraced by competing theoretical camps. We are therefore pleased that Theeuwes (2023) now agrees with core points of our theoretical position (Liesefeld et al., 2021; Liesefeld & Müller, 2020), most notably, the central role target salience plays for interference by salient distractors and the conditions that facilitate clump scanning. The present commentary traces the development of Theeuwes’ theorizing and carves out remaining discrepancies, most notably the conjecture of two qualitatively distinct search modes. Such a dichotomy is embraced by us, but decidedly rejected by Theeuwes. Accordingly, we selectively review some evidence in favor of search modes that appear crucial to the current debate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10327865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103278652023-07-08 Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023) Liesefeld, Heinrich R. Müller, Hermann J. J Cogn Commentary In a healthy scientific community, theories influence each other and promising ideas are embraced by competing theoretical camps. We are therefore pleased that Theeuwes (2023) now agrees with core points of our theoretical position (Liesefeld et al., 2021; Liesefeld & Müller, 2020), most notably, the central role target salience plays for interference by salient distractors and the conditions that facilitate clump scanning. The present commentary traces the development of Theeuwes’ theorizing and carves out remaining discrepancies, most notably the conjecture of two qualitatively distinct search modes. Such a dichotomy is embraced by us, but decidedly rejected by Theeuwes. Accordingly, we selectively review some evidence in favor of search modes that appear crucial to the current debate. Ubiquity Press 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10327865/ /pubmed/37426059 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.279 Text en Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Commentary
Liesefeld, Heinrich R.
Müller, Hermann J.
Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023)
title Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023)
title_full Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023)
title_fullStr Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023)
title_full_unstemmed Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023)
title_short Target Salience and Search Modes: A Commentary on Theeuwes (2023)
title_sort target salience and search modes: a commentary on theeuwes (2023)
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426059
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.279
work_keys_str_mv AT liesefeldheinrichr targetsalienceandsearchmodesacommentaryontheeuwes2023
AT mullerhermannj targetsalienceandsearchmodesacommentaryontheeuwes2023