Cargando…
Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study
INTRODUCTION: Clinical research with remote monitoring technologies (RMTs) has multiple advantages over standard paper-pencil tests, but also raises several ethical concerns. While several studies have addressed the issue of governance of big data in clinical research from the legal or ethical persp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285807 |
_version_ | 1785069750048522240 |
---|---|
author | Muurling, Marijn Pasmooij, Anna M. G. Koychev, Ivan Roik, Dora Froelich, Lutz Schwertner, Emilia Religa, Dorota Abdelnour, Carla Boada, Mercè Almici, Monica Galluzzi, Samantha Cardoso, Sandra de Mendonça, Alexandre Owens, Andrew P. Kuruppu, Sajini Gjestsen, Martha Therese Lazarou, Ioulietta Gkioka, Mara Tsolaki, Magda Diaz, Ana Gove, Dianne Visser, Pieter Jelle Aarsland, Dag Lucivero, Federica de Boer, Casper |
author_facet | Muurling, Marijn Pasmooij, Anna M. G. Koychev, Ivan Roik, Dora Froelich, Lutz Schwertner, Emilia Religa, Dorota Abdelnour, Carla Boada, Mercè Almici, Monica Galluzzi, Samantha Cardoso, Sandra de Mendonça, Alexandre Owens, Andrew P. Kuruppu, Sajini Gjestsen, Martha Therese Lazarou, Ioulietta Gkioka, Mara Tsolaki, Magda Diaz, Ana Gove, Dianne Visser, Pieter Jelle Aarsland, Dag Lucivero, Federica de Boer, Casper |
author_sort | Muurling, Marijn |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinical research with remote monitoring technologies (RMTs) has multiple advantages over standard paper-pencil tests, but also raises several ethical concerns. While several studies have addressed the issue of governance of big data in clinical research from the legal or ethical perspectives, the viewpoint of local research ethics committee (REC) members is underrepresented in the current literature. The aim of this study is therefore to find which specific ethical challenges are raised by RECs in the context of a large European study on remote monitoring in all syndromic stages of Alzheimer’s disease, and what gaps remain. METHODS: Documents describing the REC review process at 10 sites in 9 European countries from the project Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse–Alzheimer’s Disease (RADAR-AD) were collected and translated. Main themes emerging in the documents were identified using a qualitative analysis approach. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged after analysis: data management, participant’s wellbeing, methodological issues, and the issue of defining the regulatory category of RMTs. Review processes differed across sites: process duration varied from 71 to 423 days, some RECs did not raise any issues, whereas others raised up to 35 concerns, and the approval of a data protection officer was needed in half of the sites. DISCUSSION: The differences in the ethics review process of the same study protocol across different local settings suggest that a multi-site study would benefit from a harmonization in research ethics governance processes. More specifically, some best practices could be included in ethical reviews across institutional and national contexts, such as the opinion of an institutional data protection officer, patient advisory board reviews of the protocol and plans for how ethical reflection is embedded within the study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10328231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103282312023-07-08 Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study Muurling, Marijn Pasmooij, Anna M. G. Koychev, Ivan Roik, Dora Froelich, Lutz Schwertner, Emilia Religa, Dorota Abdelnour, Carla Boada, Mercè Almici, Monica Galluzzi, Samantha Cardoso, Sandra de Mendonça, Alexandre Owens, Andrew P. Kuruppu, Sajini Gjestsen, Martha Therese Lazarou, Ioulietta Gkioka, Mara Tsolaki, Magda Diaz, Ana Gove, Dianne Visser, Pieter Jelle Aarsland, Dag Lucivero, Federica de Boer, Casper PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Clinical research with remote monitoring technologies (RMTs) has multiple advantages over standard paper-pencil tests, but also raises several ethical concerns. While several studies have addressed the issue of governance of big data in clinical research from the legal or ethical perspectives, the viewpoint of local research ethics committee (REC) members is underrepresented in the current literature. The aim of this study is therefore to find which specific ethical challenges are raised by RECs in the context of a large European study on remote monitoring in all syndromic stages of Alzheimer’s disease, and what gaps remain. METHODS: Documents describing the REC review process at 10 sites in 9 European countries from the project Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse–Alzheimer’s Disease (RADAR-AD) were collected and translated. Main themes emerging in the documents were identified using a qualitative analysis approach. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged after analysis: data management, participant’s wellbeing, methodological issues, and the issue of defining the regulatory category of RMTs. Review processes differed across sites: process duration varied from 71 to 423 days, some RECs did not raise any issues, whereas others raised up to 35 concerns, and the approval of a data protection officer was needed in half of the sites. DISCUSSION: The differences in the ethics review process of the same study protocol across different local settings suggest that a multi-site study would benefit from a harmonization in research ethics governance processes. More specifically, some best practices could be included in ethical reviews across institutional and national contexts, such as the opinion of an institutional data protection officer, patient advisory board reviews of the protocol and plans for how ethical reflection is embedded within the study. Public Library of Science 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10328231/ /pubmed/37418385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285807 Text en © 2023 Muurling et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Muurling, Marijn Pasmooij, Anna M. G. Koychev, Ivan Roik, Dora Froelich, Lutz Schwertner, Emilia Religa, Dorota Abdelnour, Carla Boada, Mercè Almici, Monica Galluzzi, Samantha Cardoso, Sandra de Mendonça, Alexandre Owens, Andrew P. Kuruppu, Sajini Gjestsen, Martha Therese Lazarou, Ioulietta Gkioka, Mara Tsolaki, Magda Diaz, Ana Gove, Dianne Visser, Pieter Jelle Aarsland, Dag Lucivero, Federica de Boer, Casper Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study |
title | Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study |
title_full | Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study |
title_fullStr | Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study |
title_short | Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study |
title_sort | ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: a case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the radar-ad study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285807 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muurlingmarijn ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT pasmooijannamg ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT koychevivan ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT roikdora ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT froelichlutz ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT schwertneremilia ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT religadorota ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT abdelnourcarla ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT boadamerce ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT almicimonica ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT galluzzisamantha ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT cardososandra ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT demendoncaalexandre ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT owensandrewp ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT kuruppusajini ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT gjestsenmarthatherese ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT lazarouioulietta ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT gkiokamara ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT tsolakimagda ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT diazana ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT govedianne ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT visserpieterjelle ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT aarslanddag ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT luciverofederica ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT deboercasper ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy AT ethicalchallengesofusingremotemonitoringtechnologiesforclinicalresearchacasestudyoftheroleoflocalresearchethicscommitteesintheradaradstudy |