Cargando…

Robust performance comparison of PMSM for flight control applications in more electric aircraft

This paper describes a robust performance comparison of flight control actuation controllers based on a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) in more electric aircraft (MEA). Recently, the PMSM has become a favorite for the flight control applications of more electric aircraft (MEA) due to their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karboua, Djaloul, Belgacem, Toual, Khan, Zeashan Hameed, Kellal, Cherif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283541
_version_ 1785069755784232960
author Karboua, Djaloul
Belgacem, Toual
Khan, Zeashan Hameed
Kellal, Cherif
author_facet Karboua, Djaloul
Belgacem, Toual
Khan, Zeashan Hameed
Kellal, Cherif
author_sort Karboua, Djaloul
collection PubMed
description This paper describes a robust performance comparison of flight control actuation controllers based on a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) in more electric aircraft (MEA). Recently, the PMSM has become a favorite for the flight control applications of more electric aircraft (MEA) due to their improved efficiency, higher torque, less noise, and higher reliability as compared to their counterparts. Thus, advanced nonlinear control techniques offer even better performance for the control of PMSM as noticed in this research. In this paper, three nonlinear approaches i.e. Feedback Linearization Control (FBL) through the cancellation of the non-linearity of the system, the stabilization of the system via Backstepping Control (BSC) using the Lyapunov candidate function as well as the robust performance with chattering minimization by applying the continuous approximation based Sliding Mode Control (SMC) are compared with generalized Field-Oriented Controller (FOC). The comparison of FOC, FBL, BSC and SMC shows that the nonlinear controllers perform well under varying aerodynamic loads during flight. However, the performance of the sliding mode control is found superior as compared to the other three controllers in terms of better performance characteristics e.g. response time, steady-state error etc. as well as the control robustness in the presence of the uncertain parameters of the PMSM model and variable load torque acting as a disturbance. In essence, the peak of the tolerance band is less than 20% for all nonlinear and FOC controller, while it is less than 5% for SMC. Steady state error for the SMC is least (0.01%) as compared to other three controllers. Moreover, the SMC controller is able to withstand 50% parameter variation and loading torque of 10 N.m without significant changes in performance. Six simulation scenarios are used to analyze the performance and robustness which depict that the sliding mode controller performs well in terms of the desired performance for MEA application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10328255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103282552023-07-08 Robust performance comparison of PMSM for flight control applications in more electric aircraft Karboua, Djaloul Belgacem, Toual Khan, Zeashan Hameed Kellal, Cherif PLoS One Research Article This paper describes a robust performance comparison of flight control actuation controllers based on a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) in more electric aircraft (MEA). Recently, the PMSM has become a favorite for the flight control applications of more electric aircraft (MEA) due to their improved efficiency, higher torque, less noise, and higher reliability as compared to their counterparts. Thus, advanced nonlinear control techniques offer even better performance for the control of PMSM as noticed in this research. In this paper, three nonlinear approaches i.e. Feedback Linearization Control (FBL) through the cancellation of the non-linearity of the system, the stabilization of the system via Backstepping Control (BSC) using the Lyapunov candidate function as well as the robust performance with chattering minimization by applying the continuous approximation based Sliding Mode Control (SMC) are compared with generalized Field-Oriented Controller (FOC). The comparison of FOC, FBL, BSC and SMC shows that the nonlinear controllers perform well under varying aerodynamic loads during flight. However, the performance of the sliding mode control is found superior as compared to the other three controllers in terms of better performance characteristics e.g. response time, steady-state error etc. as well as the control robustness in the presence of the uncertain parameters of the PMSM model and variable load torque acting as a disturbance. In essence, the peak of the tolerance band is less than 20% for all nonlinear and FOC controller, while it is less than 5% for SMC. Steady state error for the SMC is least (0.01%) as compared to other three controllers. Moreover, the SMC controller is able to withstand 50% parameter variation and loading torque of 10 N.m without significant changes in performance. Six simulation scenarios are used to analyze the performance and robustness which depict that the sliding mode controller performs well in terms of the desired performance for MEA application. Public Library of Science 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10328255/ /pubmed/37418360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283541 Text en © 2023 Karboua et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Karboua, Djaloul
Belgacem, Toual
Khan, Zeashan Hameed
Kellal, Cherif
Robust performance comparison of PMSM for flight control applications in more electric aircraft
title Robust performance comparison of PMSM for flight control applications in more electric aircraft
title_full Robust performance comparison of PMSM for flight control applications in more electric aircraft
title_fullStr Robust performance comparison of PMSM for flight control applications in more electric aircraft
title_full_unstemmed Robust performance comparison of PMSM for flight control applications in more electric aircraft
title_short Robust performance comparison of PMSM for flight control applications in more electric aircraft
title_sort robust performance comparison of pmsm for flight control applications in more electric aircraft
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283541
work_keys_str_mv AT karbouadjaloul robustperformancecomparisonofpmsmforflightcontrolapplicationsinmoreelectricaircraft
AT belgacemtoual robustperformancecomparisonofpmsmforflightcontrolapplicationsinmoreelectricaircraft
AT khanzeashanhameed robustperformancecomparisonofpmsmforflightcontrolapplicationsinmoreelectricaircraft
AT kellalcherif robustperformancecomparisonofpmsmforflightcontrolapplicationsinmoreelectricaircraft