Cargando…
Plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool—Clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is often classified as a loss of sensation in the extremities, particularly in elderly populations. The most common diagnosis technique is with the use of the hand-applied Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. This study’s first aim was to quantify and compare sensation on th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286559 |
_version_ | 1785069783368073216 |
---|---|
author | Castellano, Vitale Kyle Commander, Jon Burch, Thomas Burch, Hayden Remy, Jessica Harman, Benjamin Zabala, Michael E. |
author_facet | Castellano, Vitale Kyle Commander, Jon Burch, Thomas Burch, Hayden Remy, Jessica Harman, Benjamin Zabala, Michael E. |
author_sort | Castellano, Vitale Kyle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is often classified as a loss of sensation in the extremities, particularly in elderly populations. The most common diagnosis technique is with the use of the hand-applied Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. This study’s first aim was to quantify and compare sensation on the plantar surface in healthy and type 2 diabetes mellitus populations with the standard Semmes-Weinstein hand-applied methodology and a tool that automates this approach. The second was to evaluate correlations between sensation and the subjects’ medical characteristics. Sensation was quantified by both tools, at thirteen locations per foot, in three populations: Group 1-control subjects without type 2 diabetes, Group 2-subjects with type 2 diabetes and with neuropathy symptoms, and Group 3-subjects with type 2 diabetes without neuropathy symptoms. The percentage of locations sensitive to the hand-applied monofilament, yet insensitive to the automated tool was calculated. Linear regression analyses between sensation and the subject’s age, body mass index, ankle brachial index, and hyperglycemia metrics were performed per group. ANOVAs determined differences between populations. Approximately 22.5% of locations assessed were sensitive to the hand-applied monofilament, yet insensitive to the automated tool. Age and sensation were only significantly correlated in Group 1 (R(2) = 0.3422, P = 0.004). Sensation was not significantly correlated with the other medical characteristics per group. Differences in sensation between the groups were not significant (P = 0.063). Caution is recommended when using hand-applied monofilaments. Group 1’s sensation was correlated to age. The other medical characteristics failed to corelate with sensation, despite group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10328367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103283672023-07-08 Plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool—Clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms Castellano, Vitale Kyle Commander, Jon Burch, Thomas Burch, Hayden Remy, Jessica Harman, Benjamin Zabala, Michael E. PLoS One Research Article Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is often classified as a loss of sensation in the extremities, particularly in elderly populations. The most common diagnosis technique is with the use of the hand-applied Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. This study’s first aim was to quantify and compare sensation on the plantar surface in healthy and type 2 diabetes mellitus populations with the standard Semmes-Weinstein hand-applied methodology and a tool that automates this approach. The second was to evaluate correlations between sensation and the subjects’ medical characteristics. Sensation was quantified by both tools, at thirteen locations per foot, in three populations: Group 1-control subjects without type 2 diabetes, Group 2-subjects with type 2 diabetes and with neuropathy symptoms, and Group 3-subjects with type 2 diabetes without neuropathy symptoms. The percentage of locations sensitive to the hand-applied monofilament, yet insensitive to the automated tool was calculated. Linear regression analyses between sensation and the subject’s age, body mass index, ankle brachial index, and hyperglycemia metrics were performed per group. ANOVAs determined differences between populations. Approximately 22.5% of locations assessed were sensitive to the hand-applied monofilament, yet insensitive to the automated tool. Age and sensation were only significantly correlated in Group 1 (R(2) = 0.3422, P = 0.004). Sensation was not significantly correlated with the other medical characteristics per group. Differences in sensation between the groups were not significant (P = 0.063). Caution is recommended when using hand-applied monofilaments. Group 1’s sensation was correlated to age. The other medical characteristics failed to corelate with sensation, despite group. Public Library of Science 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10328367/ /pubmed/37418442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286559 Text en © 2023 Castellano et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Castellano, Vitale Kyle Commander, Jon Burch, Thomas Burch, Hayden Remy, Jessica Harman, Benjamin Zabala, Michael E. Plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool—Clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms |
title | Plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool—Clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms |
title_full | Plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool—Clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms |
title_fullStr | Plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool—Clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms |
title_full_unstemmed | Plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool—Clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms |
title_short | Plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool—Clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms |
title_sort | plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool—clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT castellanovitalekyle plantarthresholdsensitivityassessmentusinganautomatedtoolclinicalassessmentcomparisonbetweenacontrolpopulationwithouttype2diabetesmellitusandpopulationswithtype2diabetesmellituswithandwithoutneuropathysymptoms AT commanderjon plantarthresholdsensitivityassessmentusinganautomatedtoolclinicalassessmentcomparisonbetweenacontrolpopulationwithouttype2diabetesmellitusandpopulationswithtype2diabetesmellituswithandwithoutneuropathysymptoms AT burchthomas plantarthresholdsensitivityassessmentusinganautomatedtoolclinicalassessmentcomparisonbetweenacontrolpopulationwithouttype2diabetesmellitusandpopulationswithtype2diabetesmellituswithandwithoutneuropathysymptoms AT burchhayden plantarthresholdsensitivityassessmentusinganautomatedtoolclinicalassessmentcomparisonbetweenacontrolpopulationwithouttype2diabetesmellitusandpopulationswithtype2diabetesmellituswithandwithoutneuropathysymptoms AT remyjessica plantarthresholdsensitivityassessmentusinganautomatedtoolclinicalassessmentcomparisonbetweenacontrolpopulationwithouttype2diabetesmellitusandpopulationswithtype2diabetesmellituswithandwithoutneuropathysymptoms AT harmanbenjamin plantarthresholdsensitivityassessmentusinganautomatedtoolclinicalassessmentcomparisonbetweenacontrolpopulationwithouttype2diabetesmellitusandpopulationswithtype2diabetesmellituswithandwithoutneuropathysymptoms AT zabalamichaele plantarthresholdsensitivityassessmentusinganautomatedtoolclinicalassessmentcomparisonbetweenacontrolpopulationwithouttype2diabetesmellitusandpopulationswithtype2diabetesmellituswithandwithoutneuropathysymptoms |