Cargando…
Considerations for routinely testing for high lipoprotein(a)
Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a likely causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve disease, confirmed by Mendelian randomization. With reliable assays, it has been established that Lp(a) is linearly associated with ASCVD. Current low-density lipoprotein choles...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000838 |
_version_ | 1785069819633074176 |
---|---|
author | Nurmohamed, Nick S Moriarty, Patrick M Stroes, Erik SG |
author_facet | Nurmohamed, Nick S Moriarty, Patrick M Stroes, Erik SG |
author_sort | Nurmohamed, Nick S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a likely causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve disease, confirmed by Mendelian randomization. With reliable assays, it has been established that Lp(a) is linearly associated with ASCVD. Current low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapies do not or minimally lower Lp(a). This review focuses on the clinical importance and therapeutic consequences of Lp(a) measurement. RECENT FINDINGS: Development of RNA-based Lp(a) lowering therapeutics has positioned Lp(a) as one of the principal residual risk factors to target in the battle against lipid-driven ASCVD risk. Pelacarsen, which is a liver-specific antisense oligonucleotide, has shown Lp(a) reductions up to 90% and its phase 3 trial is currently underway. Olpasiran is a small interfering RNA targeting LPA messenger RNA, which is being investigated in phase 2 and has already shown dose-dependent Lp(a) reductions up to 90%. SUMMARY: Lp(a) should be measured in every patient at least once to identify patients with very high Lp(a) levels. These patients could benefit from Lp(a) lowering therapies when approved. In the meantime, therapy in high Lp(a) patients should focus on further reducing LDL-C and other ASCVD risk factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10328534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103285342023-07-08 Considerations for routinely testing for high lipoprotein(a) Nurmohamed, Nick S Moriarty, Patrick M Stroes, Erik SG Curr Opin Lipidol Special Commentaries Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a likely causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve disease, confirmed by Mendelian randomization. With reliable assays, it has been established that Lp(a) is linearly associated with ASCVD. Current low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapies do not or minimally lower Lp(a). This review focuses on the clinical importance and therapeutic consequences of Lp(a) measurement. RECENT FINDINGS: Development of RNA-based Lp(a) lowering therapeutics has positioned Lp(a) as one of the principal residual risk factors to target in the battle against lipid-driven ASCVD risk. Pelacarsen, which is a liver-specific antisense oligonucleotide, has shown Lp(a) reductions up to 90% and its phase 3 trial is currently underway. Olpasiran is a small interfering RNA targeting LPA messenger RNA, which is being investigated in phase 2 and has already shown dose-dependent Lp(a) reductions up to 90%. SUMMARY: Lp(a) should be measured in every patient at least once to identify patients with very high Lp(a) levels. These patients could benefit from Lp(a) lowering therapies when approved. In the meantime, therapy in high Lp(a) patients should focus on further reducing LDL-C and other ASCVD risk factors. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10328534/ /pubmed/35942815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000838 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Special Commentaries Nurmohamed, Nick S Moriarty, Patrick M Stroes, Erik SG Considerations for routinely testing for high lipoprotein(a) |
title | Considerations for routinely testing for high lipoprotein(a) |
title_full | Considerations for routinely testing for high lipoprotein(a) |
title_fullStr | Considerations for routinely testing for high lipoprotein(a) |
title_full_unstemmed | Considerations for routinely testing for high lipoprotein(a) |
title_short | Considerations for routinely testing for high lipoprotein(a) |
title_sort | considerations for routinely testing for high lipoprotein(a) |
topic | Special Commentaries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nurmohamednicks considerationsforroutinelytestingforhighlipoproteina AT moriartypatrickm considerationsforroutinelytestingforhighlipoproteina AT stroeseriksg considerationsforroutinelytestingforhighlipoproteina |