Cargando…
Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis
Ibrutinib is reported effective in the management of refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma but it has adverse effects. Orelabrutinib has received its first approval for the treatment of refractory/relapsed lymphoma either alone or with chemotherapy in China. The objectives of t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37417642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033880 |
_version_ | 1785069860258054144 |
---|---|
author | Qiao, Lijiao Liu, Quanxia Huang, Chunzhou |
author_facet | Qiao, Lijiao Liu, Quanxia Huang, Chunzhou |
author_sort | Qiao, Lijiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ibrutinib is reported effective in the management of refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma but it has adverse effects. Orelabrutinib has received its first approval for the treatment of refractory/relapsed lymphoma either alone or with chemotherapy in China. The objectives of the retrospective study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment a combination of orelabrutinib (150 mg/day) and rituximab (250 mg/m(2) per week), versus orelabrutinib alone (100 mg twice a day) and ibrutinib alone (560 mg/day) among patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma. Patients received 150 mg/day orelabrutinib with 250 mg/m(2) rituximab/week (RO cohort, n = 105) or 100 mg twice in a day orelabrutinib (OB cohort, n = 107) or 560 mg/day ibrutinib (IB cohort, n = 117) until intolerable toxicity. Patients of the OB cohort continue treatment(s) for longer time than those patients of the RO and the IB cohorts (P < .05 for both). Overall response rate (complete response + partial response) and disease control rates (complete response + partial response + no signs of progressive response) were higher for patients of the RO cohort than those of the IB cohort (P < .0001 for both). The disease control rate was higher for patients of the OB cohort than those of the IB cohort (P = .0062). The overall response rate was higher for patients of the RO cohort than those of the OB cohort (P = .0188). Progression-free survival (from the initiation of disease treatment(s) to disease progression) of patients of the RO and OB cohorts were higher than those of the IB cohort (P < .0001 for both). Overall survival (from the initiation of disease treatment(s) to death) of the patients of the IB cohort was fewer than those of the RO (P = .0444) and the OB (P = .0163) cohorts. Ibrutinib cause bleeding events, and orelabrutinib caused leukopenia, purpura diarrhea, fatigue, and drowsiness. Rituximab and ibrutinib cause fungal infections, atrial fibrillation, bacterial and viral infection(s), hypertension, and tumor lysis syndrome. A total of 150 mg/day oral orelabrutinib plus 250 mg/m(2) intravenous rituximab/week is efficacious and safe for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma (Level of Evidence: IV; Technical Efficacy Stage: 5). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10328710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103287102023-07-08 Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis Qiao, Lijiao Liu, Quanxia Huang, Chunzhou Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Ibrutinib is reported effective in the management of refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma but it has adverse effects. Orelabrutinib has received its first approval for the treatment of refractory/relapsed lymphoma either alone or with chemotherapy in China. The objectives of the retrospective study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment a combination of orelabrutinib (150 mg/day) and rituximab (250 mg/m(2) per week), versus orelabrutinib alone (100 mg twice a day) and ibrutinib alone (560 mg/day) among patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma. Patients received 150 mg/day orelabrutinib with 250 mg/m(2) rituximab/week (RO cohort, n = 105) or 100 mg twice in a day orelabrutinib (OB cohort, n = 107) or 560 mg/day ibrutinib (IB cohort, n = 117) until intolerable toxicity. Patients of the OB cohort continue treatment(s) for longer time than those patients of the RO and the IB cohorts (P < .05 for both). Overall response rate (complete response + partial response) and disease control rates (complete response + partial response + no signs of progressive response) were higher for patients of the RO cohort than those of the IB cohort (P < .0001 for both). The disease control rate was higher for patients of the OB cohort than those of the IB cohort (P = .0062). The overall response rate was higher for patients of the RO cohort than those of the OB cohort (P = .0188). Progression-free survival (from the initiation of disease treatment(s) to disease progression) of patients of the RO and OB cohorts were higher than those of the IB cohort (P < .0001 for both). Overall survival (from the initiation of disease treatment(s) to death) of the patients of the IB cohort was fewer than those of the RO (P = .0444) and the OB (P = .0163) cohorts. Ibrutinib cause bleeding events, and orelabrutinib caused leukopenia, purpura diarrhea, fatigue, and drowsiness. Rituximab and ibrutinib cause fungal infections, atrial fibrillation, bacterial and viral infection(s), hypertension, and tumor lysis syndrome. A total of 150 mg/day oral orelabrutinib plus 250 mg/m(2) intravenous rituximab/week is efficacious and safe for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma (Level of Evidence: IV; Technical Efficacy Stage: 5). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10328710/ /pubmed/37417642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033880 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 5700 Qiao, Lijiao Liu, Quanxia Huang, Chunzhou Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis |
title | Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis |
title_full | Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis |
title_fullStr | Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis |
title_short | Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis |
title_sort | orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: an efficacy and safety analysis |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37417642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033880 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiaolijiao orelabrutinibversusibrutinibforpatientswithrefractoryrelapsedprimarycentralnervoussystemlymphomaanefficacyandsafetyanalysis AT liuquanxia orelabrutinibversusibrutinibforpatientswithrefractoryrelapsedprimarycentralnervoussystemlymphomaanefficacyandsafetyanalysis AT huangchunzhou orelabrutinibversusibrutinibforpatientswithrefractoryrelapsedprimarycentralnervoussystemlymphomaanefficacyandsafetyanalysis |