Cargando…

Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis

Ibrutinib is reported effective in the management of refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma but it has adverse effects. Orelabrutinib has received its first approval for the treatment of refractory/relapsed lymphoma either alone or with chemotherapy in China. The objectives of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiao, Lijiao, Liu, Quanxia, Huang, Chunzhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37417642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033880
_version_ 1785069860258054144
author Qiao, Lijiao
Liu, Quanxia
Huang, Chunzhou
author_facet Qiao, Lijiao
Liu, Quanxia
Huang, Chunzhou
author_sort Qiao, Lijiao
collection PubMed
description Ibrutinib is reported effective in the management of refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma but it has adverse effects. Orelabrutinib has received its first approval for the treatment of refractory/relapsed lymphoma either alone or with chemotherapy in China. The objectives of the retrospective study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment a combination of orelabrutinib (150 mg/day) and rituximab (250 mg/m(2) per week), versus orelabrutinib alone (100 mg twice a day) and ibrutinib alone (560 mg/day) among patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma. Patients received 150 mg/day orelabrutinib with 250 mg/m(2) rituximab/week (RO cohort, n = 105) or 100 mg twice in a day orelabrutinib (OB cohort, n = 107) or 560 mg/day ibrutinib (IB cohort, n = 117) until intolerable toxicity. Patients of the OB cohort continue treatment(s) for longer time than those patients of the RO and the IB cohorts (P < .05 for both). Overall response rate (complete response + partial response) and disease control rates (complete response + partial response + no signs of progressive response) were higher for patients of the RO cohort than those of the IB cohort (P < .0001 for both). The disease control rate was higher for patients of the OB cohort than those of the IB cohort (P = .0062). The overall response rate was higher for patients of the RO cohort than those of the OB cohort (P = .0188). Progression-free survival (from the initiation of disease treatment(s) to disease progression) of patients of the RO and OB cohorts were higher than those of the IB cohort (P < .0001 for both). Overall survival (from the initiation of disease treatment(s) to death) of the patients of the IB cohort was fewer than those of the RO (P = .0444) and the OB (P = .0163) cohorts. Ibrutinib cause bleeding events, and orelabrutinib caused leukopenia, purpura diarrhea, fatigue, and drowsiness. Rituximab and ibrutinib cause fungal infections, atrial fibrillation, bacterial and viral infection(s), hypertension, and tumor lysis syndrome. A total of 150 mg/day oral orelabrutinib plus 250 mg/m(2) intravenous rituximab/week is efficacious and safe for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma (Level of Evidence: IV; Technical Efficacy Stage: 5).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10328710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103287102023-07-08 Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis Qiao, Lijiao Liu, Quanxia Huang, Chunzhou Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Ibrutinib is reported effective in the management of refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma but it has adverse effects. Orelabrutinib has received its first approval for the treatment of refractory/relapsed lymphoma either alone or with chemotherapy in China. The objectives of the retrospective study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment a combination of orelabrutinib (150 mg/day) and rituximab (250 mg/m(2) per week), versus orelabrutinib alone (100 mg twice a day) and ibrutinib alone (560 mg/day) among patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma. Patients received 150 mg/day orelabrutinib with 250 mg/m(2) rituximab/week (RO cohort, n = 105) or 100 mg twice in a day orelabrutinib (OB cohort, n = 107) or 560 mg/day ibrutinib (IB cohort, n = 117) until intolerable toxicity. Patients of the OB cohort continue treatment(s) for longer time than those patients of the RO and the IB cohorts (P < .05 for both). Overall response rate (complete response + partial response) and disease control rates (complete response + partial response + no signs of progressive response) were higher for patients of the RO cohort than those of the IB cohort (P < .0001 for both). The disease control rate was higher for patients of the OB cohort than those of the IB cohort (P = .0062). The overall response rate was higher for patients of the RO cohort than those of the OB cohort (P = .0188). Progression-free survival (from the initiation of disease treatment(s) to disease progression) of patients of the RO and OB cohorts were higher than those of the IB cohort (P < .0001 for both). Overall survival (from the initiation of disease treatment(s) to death) of the patients of the IB cohort was fewer than those of the RO (P = .0444) and the OB (P = .0163) cohorts. Ibrutinib cause bleeding events, and orelabrutinib caused leukopenia, purpura diarrhea, fatigue, and drowsiness. Rituximab and ibrutinib cause fungal infections, atrial fibrillation, bacterial and viral infection(s), hypertension, and tumor lysis syndrome. A total of 150 mg/day oral orelabrutinib plus 250 mg/m(2) intravenous rituximab/week is efficacious and safe for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma (Level of Evidence: IV; Technical Efficacy Stage: 5). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10328710/ /pubmed/37417642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033880 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 5700
Qiao, Lijiao
Liu, Quanxia
Huang, Chunzhou
Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis
title Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis
title_full Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis
title_fullStr Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis
title_full_unstemmed Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis
title_short Orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: An efficacy and safety analysis
title_sort orelabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with refractory/relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma: an efficacy and safety analysis
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37417642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033880
work_keys_str_mv AT qiaolijiao orelabrutinibversusibrutinibforpatientswithrefractoryrelapsedprimarycentralnervoussystemlymphomaanefficacyandsafetyanalysis
AT liuquanxia orelabrutinibversusibrutinibforpatientswithrefractoryrelapsedprimarycentralnervoussystemlymphomaanefficacyandsafetyanalysis
AT huangchunzhou orelabrutinibversusibrutinibforpatientswithrefractoryrelapsedprimarycentralnervoussystemlymphomaanefficacyandsafetyanalysis