Cargando…
Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ongoing debate concerning the choice of valve prosthesis for women requiring mitral valve replacement (MVR) and who wish to conceive. Bioprostheses are associated with risk of early structural valve deterioration. Mechanical prostheses require lifelong anticoagulation and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.001 |
_version_ | 1785069922335850496 |
---|---|
author | Grashuis, Pepijn Khargi, Shanti D.M. Veen, Kevin el Osrouti, Azzeddine Bemelmans-Lalezari, Shirin Cornette, Jérôme M.J. Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W. Takkenberg, Johanna J.M. Mokhles, Mostafa M. |
author_facet | Grashuis, Pepijn Khargi, Shanti D.M. Veen, Kevin el Osrouti, Azzeddine Bemelmans-Lalezari, Shirin Cornette, Jérôme M.J. Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W. Takkenberg, Johanna J.M. Mokhles, Mostafa M. |
author_sort | Grashuis, Pepijn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ongoing debate concerning the choice of valve prosthesis for women requiring mitral valve replacement (MVR) and who wish to conceive. Bioprostheses are associated with risk of early structural valve deterioration. Mechanical prostheses require lifelong anticoagulation and carry maternal and fetal risks. Also, the optimal anticoagulation regimen during pregnancy after MVR remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of studies reporting on pregnancy after MVR. Valve- and anticoagulation-related maternal and fetal risks during pregnancy and 30 days’ postpartum were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifteen studies reporting 722 pregnancies were included. In total, 87.2% of pregnant women had a mechanical prosthesis and 12.5% a bioprosthesis. Maternal mortality risk was 1.33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-2.56), any hemorrhage risk 6.90% (95% CI, 3.70-12.88). Valve thrombosis risk was 4.71% (95% CI, 3.06-7.26) in patients with mechanical prostheses. 3.23% (95% CI, 1.34-7.75) of the patients with bioprostheses experienced early structural valve deterioration. Of these, the mortality was 40%. Pregnancy loss risk was 29.29% (95% CI, 19.74-43.47) with mechanical prostheses versus 13.50% (95% CI, 4.31-42.30) for bioprostheses. Switching to heparin during the first trimester demonstrated a bleeding risk of 7.78% (95% CI, 3.71-16.31) versus 4.08% (95% CI, 1.17-14.28) for women on oral anticoagulants throughout pregnancy and a valve thrombosis risk of 6.99% (95% CI, 2.08-23.51) versus 2.89% (95% CI, 1.40-5.94). Administration of anticoagulant dosages greater than 5 mg resulted in a risk of fetal adverse events of 74.24% (95% CI, 56.11-98.23) versus 8.85% (95% CI, 2.70-28.99) in ≤5 mg. CONCLUSIONS: A bioprosthesis seems the best option for women of childbearing age who are interested in future pregnancy after MVR. If mechanical valve replacement is preferred, the favorable anticoagulation regimen is continuous low-dose oral anticoagulants. Shared decision-making remains priority when choosing a prosthetic valve for young women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10328972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103289722023-07-09 Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Grashuis, Pepijn Khargi, Shanti D.M. Veen, Kevin el Osrouti, Azzeddine Bemelmans-Lalezari, Shirin Cornette, Jérôme M.J. Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W. Takkenberg, Johanna J.M. Mokhles, Mostafa M. JTCVS Open Adult: Mitral Valve: Expert Review OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ongoing debate concerning the choice of valve prosthesis for women requiring mitral valve replacement (MVR) and who wish to conceive. Bioprostheses are associated with risk of early structural valve deterioration. Mechanical prostheses require lifelong anticoagulation and carry maternal and fetal risks. Also, the optimal anticoagulation regimen during pregnancy after MVR remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of studies reporting on pregnancy after MVR. Valve- and anticoagulation-related maternal and fetal risks during pregnancy and 30 days’ postpartum were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifteen studies reporting 722 pregnancies were included. In total, 87.2% of pregnant women had a mechanical prosthesis and 12.5% a bioprosthesis. Maternal mortality risk was 1.33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-2.56), any hemorrhage risk 6.90% (95% CI, 3.70-12.88). Valve thrombosis risk was 4.71% (95% CI, 3.06-7.26) in patients with mechanical prostheses. 3.23% (95% CI, 1.34-7.75) of the patients with bioprostheses experienced early structural valve deterioration. Of these, the mortality was 40%. Pregnancy loss risk was 29.29% (95% CI, 19.74-43.47) with mechanical prostheses versus 13.50% (95% CI, 4.31-42.30) for bioprostheses. Switching to heparin during the first trimester demonstrated a bleeding risk of 7.78% (95% CI, 3.71-16.31) versus 4.08% (95% CI, 1.17-14.28) for women on oral anticoagulants throughout pregnancy and a valve thrombosis risk of 6.99% (95% CI, 2.08-23.51) versus 2.89% (95% CI, 1.40-5.94). Administration of anticoagulant dosages greater than 5 mg resulted in a risk of fetal adverse events of 74.24% (95% CI, 56.11-98.23) versus 8.85% (95% CI, 2.70-28.99) in ≤5 mg. CONCLUSIONS: A bioprosthesis seems the best option for women of childbearing age who are interested in future pregnancy after MVR. If mechanical valve replacement is preferred, the favorable anticoagulation regimen is continuous low-dose oral anticoagulants. Shared decision-making remains priority when choosing a prosthetic valve for young women. Elsevier 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10328972/ /pubmed/37425470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.001 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Adult: Mitral Valve: Expert Review Grashuis, Pepijn Khargi, Shanti D.M. Veen, Kevin el Osrouti, Azzeddine Bemelmans-Lalezari, Shirin Cornette, Jérôme M.J. Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W. Takkenberg, Johanna J.M. Mokhles, Mostafa M. Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Adult: Mitral Valve: Expert Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grashuispepijn pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT khargishantidm pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT veenkevin pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT elosroutiazzeddine pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bemelmanslalezarishirin pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cornettejeromemj pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rooshesselinkjolienw pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT takkenbergjohannajm pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mokhlesmostafam pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |