Cargando…

Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ongoing debate concerning the choice of valve prosthesis for women requiring mitral valve replacement (MVR) and who wish to conceive. Bioprostheses are associated with risk of early structural valve deterioration. Mechanical prostheses require lifelong anticoagulation and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grashuis, Pepijn, Khargi, Shanti D.M., Veen, Kevin, el Osrouti, Azzeddine, Bemelmans-Lalezari, Shirin, Cornette, Jérôme M.J., Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W., Takkenberg, Johanna J.M., Mokhles, Mostafa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.001
_version_ 1785069922335850496
author Grashuis, Pepijn
Khargi, Shanti D.M.
Veen, Kevin
el Osrouti, Azzeddine
Bemelmans-Lalezari, Shirin
Cornette, Jérôme M.J.
Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W.
Takkenberg, Johanna J.M.
Mokhles, Mostafa M.
author_facet Grashuis, Pepijn
Khargi, Shanti D.M.
Veen, Kevin
el Osrouti, Azzeddine
Bemelmans-Lalezari, Shirin
Cornette, Jérôme M.J.
Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W.
Takkenberg, Johanna J.M.
Mokhles, Mostafa M.
author_sort Grashuis, Pepijn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ongoing debate concerning the choice of valve prosthesis for women requiring mitral valve replacement (MVR) and who wish to conceive. Bioprostheses are associated with risk of early structural valve deterioration. Mechanical prostheses require lifelong anticoagulation and carry maternal and fetal risks. Also, the optimal anticoagulation regimen during pregnancy after MVR remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of studies reporting on pregnancy after MVR. Valve- and anticoagulation-related maternal and fetal risks during pregnancy and 30 days’ postpartum were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifteen studies reporting 722 pregnancies were included. In total, 87.2% of pregnant women had a mechanical prosthesis and 12.5% a bioprosthesis. Maternal mortality risk was 1.33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-2.56), any hemorrhage risk 6.90% (95% CI, 3.70-12.88). Valve thrombosis risk was 4.71% (95% CI, 3.06-7.26) in patients with mechanical prostheses. 3.23% (95% CI, 1.34-7.75) of the patients with bioprostheses experienced early structural valve deterioration. Of these, the mortality was 40%. Pregnancy loss risk was 29.29% (95% CI, 19.74-43.47) with mechanical prostheses versus 13.50% (95% CI, 4.31-42.30) for bioprostheses. Switching to heparin during the first trimester demonstrated a bleeding risk of 7.78% (95% CI, 3.71-16.31) versus 4.08% (95% CI, 1.17-14.28) for women on oral anticoagulants throughout pregnancy and a valve thrombosis risk of 6.99% (95% CI, 2.08-23.51) versus 2.89% (95% CI, 1.40-5.94). Administration of anticoagulant dosages greater than 5 mg resulted in a risk of fetal adverse events of 74.24% (95% CI, 56.11-98.23) versus 8.85% (95% CI, 2.70-28.99) in ≤5 mg. CONCLUSIONS: A bioprosthesis seems the best option for women of childbearing age who are interested in future pregnancy after MVR. If mechanical valve replacement is preferred, the favorable anticoagulation regimen is continuous low-dose oral anticoagulants. Shared decision-making remains priority when choosing a prosthetic valve for young women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10328972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103289722023-07-09 Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Grashuis, Pepijn Khargi, Shanti D.M. Veen, Kevin el Osrouti, Azzeddine Bemelmans-Lalezari, Shirin Cornette, Jérôme M.J. Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W. Takkenberg, Johanna J.M. Mokhles, Mostafa M. JTCVS Open Adult: Mitral Valve: Expert Review OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ongoing debate concerning the choice of valve prosthesis for women requiring mitral valve replacement (MVR) and who wish to conceive. Bioprostheses are associated with risk of early structural valve deterioration. Mechanical prostheses require lifelong anticoagulation and carry maternal and fetal risks. Also, the optimal anticoagulation regimen during pregnancy after MVR remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of studies reporting on pregnancy after MVR. Valve- and anticoagulation-related maternal and fetal risks during pregnancy and 30 days’ postpartum were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifteen studies reporting 722 pregnancies were included. In total, 87.2% of pregnant women had a mechanical prosthesis and 12.5% a bioprosthesis. Maternal mortality risk was 1.33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-2.56), any hemorrhage risk 6.90% (95% CI, 3.70-12.88). Valve thrombosis risk was 4.71% (95% CI, 3.06-7.26) in patients with mechanical prostheses. 3.23% (95% CI, 1.34-7.75) of the patients with bioprostheses experienced early structural valve deterioration. Of these, the mortality was 40%. Pregnancy loss risk was 29.29% (95% CI, 19.74-43.47) with mechanical prostheses versus 13.50% (95% CI, 4.31-42.30) for bioprostheses. Switching to heparin during the first trimester demonstrated a bleeding risk of 7.78% (95% CI, 3.71-16.31) versus 4.08% (95% CI, 1.17-14.28) for women on oral anticoagulants throughout pregnancy and a valve thrombosis risk of 6.99% (95% CI, 2.08-23.51) versus 2.89% (95% CI, 1.40-5.94). Administration of anticoagulant dosages greater than 5 mg resulted in a risk of fetal adverse events of 74.24% (95% CI, 56.11-98.23) versus 8.85% (95% CI, 2.70-28.99) in ≤5 mg. CONCLUSIONS: A bioprosthesis seems the best option for women of childbearing age who are interested in future pregnancy after MVR. If mechanical valve replacement is preferred, the favorable anticoagulation regimen is continuous low-dose oral anticoagulants. Shared decision-making remains priority when choosing a prosthetic valve for young women. Elsevier 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10328972/ /pubmed/37425470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.001 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Adult: Mitral Valve: Expert Review
Grashuis, Pepijn
Khargi, Shanti D.M.
Veen, Kevin
el Osrouti, Azzeddine
Bemelmans-Lalezari, Shirin
Cornette, Jérôme M.J.
Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W.
Takkenberg, Johanna J.M.
Mokhles, Mostafa M.
Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Adult: Mitral Valve: Expert Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37425470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.001
work_keys_str_mv AT grashuispepijn pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khargishantidm pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT veenkevin pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elosroutiazzeddine pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bemelmanslalezarishirin pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cornettejeromemj pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rooshesselinkjolienw pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT takkenbergjohannajm pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mokhlesmostafam pregnancyoutcomesinwomenwithamitralvalveprosthesisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis