Cargando…

Suitability of the animated activity questionnaire for use as computer adaptive test: establishing the AAQ-CAT

PURPOSE: The animated activity questionnaire (AAQ) is a computer-based measure of activity limitations. To answer a question, patients choose the animation of a person performing an activity that matches their own level of limitation. The AAQ has not yet been tested for suitability to be applied as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liegl, Gregor, Roorda, Leo D., Terwee, Caroline B., Steultjens, Martijn, Roos, Ewa M., Guillemin, Francis, Benedetti, Maria Grazia, Dagfinrud, Hanne, de Carvalho Bastone, Alessandra, Peter, Wilfred F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37010805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03402-4
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The animated activity questionnaire (AAQ) is a computer-based measure of activity limitations. To answer a question, patients choose the animation of a person performing an activity that matches their own level of limitation. The AAQ has not yet been tested for suitability to be applied as computer-adaptive test (CAT). Thus, the objective of this study was to develop and evaluate an AAQ-based CAT to facilitate the application of the AAQ in daily clinical care. METHODS: Patients (n = 1408) with hip/knee osteoarthritis from Brazil, Denmark, France, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and the UK responded to all 17 AAQ items. Assumptions of item-response theory (IRT) modelling were investigated. To establish item parameters for the CAT, a graded response model was estimated. To evaluate the performance of post-hoc simulated AAQ-based CATs, precision, test length, and construct validity (correlations with well-established measures of activity limitations) were evaluated. RESULTS: Unidimensionality (CFI = 0.95), measurement invariance (R(2)-change < 2%), and IRT item fit (S-X(2) p > .003) of the AAQ were supported. Performing simulated CATs, the mean test length was more than halved (≤ 8 items), while the range of precise measurement (standard error ≤ 0.3) was comparable to the full AAQ. The correlations between original AAQ scores and three AAQ-CAT versions were ≥ 0.95. Correlations of AAQ-CAT scores with patient-reported and performance measures of activity limitations were ≥ 0.60. CONCLUSION: The almost non-verbal AAQ-CAT is an innovative and efficient tool in patients with hip/knee osteoarthritis from various countries, measuring activity limitations with lower respondent burden, but similar precision and construct validity compared to the full AAQ. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-023-03402-4.