Cargando…

Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter

OBJECTIVE: Induction of labor concerns about 29 % of women in Unites States and 33 % in Europe. Among the various methods for cervical ripening, the efficacy and safety profiles of oral misoprostol and balloon catheter are comparable, but data in the literature on maternal satisfaction during induct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flament, Emeline, Blanc-Petitjean, Pauline, Koch, Antoine, Deruelle, Philippe, Le Ray, Camille, Sananès, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100202
_version_ 1785069952055640064
author Flament, Emeline
Blanc-Petitjean, Pauline
Koch, Antoine
Deruelle, Philippe
Le Ray, Camille
Sananès, Nicolas
author_facet Flament, Emeline
Blanc-Petitjean, Pauline
Koch, Antoine
Deruelle, Philippe
Le Ray, Camille
Sananès, Nicolas
author_sort Flament, Emeline
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Induction of labor concerns about 29 % of women in Unites States and 33 % in Europe. Among the various methods for cervical ripening, the efficacy and safety profiles of oral misoprostol and balloon catheter are comparable, but data in the literature on maternal satisfaction during induction of labor are few. The objective of this study was to assess the satisfaction of women who chose the method of cervical ripening, i.e. either balloon catheter or oral misoprostol, for induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study asked women who had undergone induction of labor between February 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021. After receiving verbal and written information, the choice of method between oral misoprostol and balloon catheter was left to the patient’s free appreciation. Satisfaction was assessed by means of a questionnaire distributed to all women during their stay in the maternity unit. The principal assessment criterion was based on women’ inclination to choose the same cervical ripening method if induction of labor were to prove necessary in a future pregnancy, and their willingness to recommend this method to a friend. Univariate analyses were conducted using Student’s t-test, Chi-2 test or Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: On 575 women eligible for analysis, 365 (63.5 %) of these women replied to the satisfaction questionnaire. Of this number, 236 (64.7 %) chose cervical ripening by balloon catheter, and 129 (35.3 %) by oral misoprostol. No significant difference was found between the two groups: 68.2 % of women in the balloon catheter group would opt for the same method of cervical ripening if it proved necessary in a future pregnancy and 64.7% would recommend it to a pregnant friend, versus 65.9 % and 63.6 % in the oral misoprostol group, respectively. Women were overall pleased to be able to choose their method of cervical ripening: 90.5 % of patients in the balloon catheter group and 95.3 % in the oral misoprostol group CONCLUSIONS: When women choose the method of cervical ripening, satisfaction is overall good, irrespective of the method, whether by balloon catheter or misoprostol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10329108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103291082023-07-09 Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter Flament, Emeline Blanc-Petitjean, Pauline Koch, Antoine Deruelle, Philippe Le Ray, Camille Sananès, Nicolas Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine OBJECTIVE: Induction of labor concerns about 29 % of women in Unites States and 33 % in Europe. Among the various methods for cervical ripening, the efficacy and safety profiles of oral misoprostol and balloon catheter are comparable, but data in the literature on maternal satisfaction during induction of labor are few. The objective of this study was to assess the satisfaction of women who chose the method of cervical ripening, i.e. either balloon catheter or oral misoprostol, for induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study asked women who had undergone induction of labor between February 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021. After receiving verbal and written information, the choice of method between oral misoprostol and balloon catheter was left to the patient’s free appreciation. Satisfaction was assessed by means of a questionnaire distributed to all women during their stay in the maternity unit. The principal assessment criterion was based on women’ inclination to choose the same cervical ripening method if induction of labor were to prove necessary in a future pregnancy, and their willingness to recommend this method to a friend. Univariate analyses were conducted using Student’s t-test, Chi-2 test or Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: On 575 women eligible for analysis, 365 (63.5 %) of these women replied to the satisfaction questionnaire. Of this number, 236 (64.7 %) chose cervical ripening by balloon catheter, and 129 (35.3 %) by oral misoprostol. No significant difference was found between the two groups: 68.2 % of women in the balloon catheter group would opt for the same method of cervical ripening if it proved necessary in a future pregnancy and 64.7% would recommend it to a pregnant friend, versus 65.9 % and 63.6 % in the oral misoprostol group, respectively. Women were overall pleased to be able to choose their method of cervical ripening: 90.5 % of patients in the balloon catheter group and 95.3 % in the oral misoprostol group CONCLUSIONS: When women choose the method of cervical ripening, satisfaction is overall good, irrespective of the method, whether by balloon catheter or misoprostol. Elsevier 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10329108/ /pubmed/37426940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100202 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine
Flament, Emeline
Blanc-Petitjean, Pauline
Koch, Antoine
Deruelle, Philippe
Le Ray, Camille
Sananès, Nicolas
Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter
title Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter
title_full Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter
title_fullStr Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter
title_full_unstemmed Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter
title_short Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter
title_sort women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter
topic Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100202
work_keys_str_mv AT flamentemeline womensatisfactiononchoosingthecervicalripeningmethodoralmisoprostolversusballooncatheter
AT blancpetitjeanpauline womensatisfactiononchoosingthecervicalripeningmethodoralmisoprostolversusballooncatheter
AT kochantoine womensatisfactiononchoosingthecervicalripeningmethodoralmisoprostolversusballooncatheter
AT deruellephilippe womensatisfactiononchoosingthecervicalripeningmethodoralmisoprostolversusballooncatheter
AT leraycamille womensatisfactiononchoosingthecervicalripeningmethodoralmisoprostolversusballooncatheter
AT sananesnicolas womensatisfactiononchoosingthecervicalripeningmethodoralmisoprostolversusballooncatheter