Cargando…

Safety Endpoints With Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With Non–Dialysis-Dependent CKD: A Post Hoc Regional Analysis of the PRO(2)TECT Randomized Clinical Trial of ESA-Treated Patients

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: In the PRO(2)TECT trials, vadadustat was found to be noninferior to darbepoetin alfa in hematologic efficacy but not for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause death or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke) in patients with non–dialysis-dependent chronic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parfrey, Patrick S., Burke, Steven K., Chertow, Glenn M., Eckardt, Kai-Uwe, Jardine, Alan G., Lewis, Eldrin F., Luo, Wenli, Matsushita, Kunihiro, McCullough, Peter A., Minga, Todd, Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37427292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100667
_version_ 1785069962940907520
author Parfrey, Patrick S.
Burke, Steven K.
Chertow, Glenn M.
Eckardt, Kai-Uwe
Jardine, Alan G.
Lewis, Eldrin F.
Luo, Wenli
Matsushita, Kunihiro
McCullough, Peter A.
Minga, Todd
Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
author_facet Parfrey, Patrick S.
Burke, Steven K.
Chertow, Glenn M.
Eckardt, Kai-Uwe
Jardine, Alan G.
Lewis, Eldrin F.
Luo, Wenli
Matsushita, Kunihiro
McCullough, Peter A.
Minga, Todd
Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
author_sort Parfrey, Patrick S.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: In the PRO(2)TECT trials, vadadustat was found to be noninferior to darbepoetin alfa in hematologic efficacy but not for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause death or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke) in patients with non–dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD). We investigated the regional differences in MACE in the PRO(2)TECT trials. STUDY DESIGN: Phase 3, global, open-label, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,725 erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-treated patients with anemia and NDD-CKD. INTERVENTION: 1:1 randomization to receive vadadustat or darbepoetin alfa. OUTCOMES: The primary safety end point was the time to first MACE. RESULTS: At baseline, patients in Europe (n=444) were primarily treated with darbepoetin alfa, showed higher proportions on low ESA doses (<90 U/kg/wk epoetin alfa equivalents) with a hemoglobin concentration of ≥10 g/dL compared with patients in the US (n=665) and non-US/non-Europe (n=614) regions. The MACE rates per 100 person-years in the 3 vadadustat groups across regions were 14.5 in the US, 11.6 in Europe, and 10.0 in the non-US/non-Europe groups, whereas event rates in the darbepoetin alfa group were considerably lower in Europe than in the US and non-US/non-Europe groups (6.7 vs 13.3 and 10.5, respectively). The overall hazard ratio for MACE for vadadustat vs darbepoetin alpha was 1.16; 95% CI, 0.93-1.45, but varied by geographical region, with a greater hazard ratio seen in Europe (US, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.78-1.46; Europe, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.24-3.39; non-US/non-Europe, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.60-1.37); interaction between study treatment and geographical region, P = 0.07). In Europe, ESA rescue was associated with a higher risk of MACE in both groups. LIMITATIONS: Several analyses are exploratory. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, there was a low risk of MACE in the darbepoetin alfa group in Europe. Patients in Europe were generally on low doses of ESA, with hemoglobin already within target range. The low risk of MACE may have been related to a limited need to switch and titrate darbepoetin alfa compared with the non-US/non-Europe group. FUNDING: Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02680574
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10329165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103291652023-07-09 Safety Endpoints With Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With Non–Dialysis-Dependent CKD: A Post Hoc Regional Analysis of the PRO(2)TECT Randomized Clinical Trial of ESA-Treated Patients Parfrey, Patrick S. Burke, Steven K. Chertow, Glenn M. Eckardt, Kai-Uwe Jardine, Alan G. Lewis, Eldrin F. Luo, Wenli Matsushita, Kunihiro McCullough, Peter A. Minga, Todd Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. Kidney Med Original Research RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: In the PRO(2)TECT trials, vadadustat was found to be noninferior to darbepoetin alfa in hematologic efficacy but not for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause death or nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke) in patients with non–dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD). We investigated the regional differences in MACE in the PRO(2)TECT trials. STUDY DESIGN: Phase 3, global, open-label, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,725 erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-treated patients with anemia and NDD-CKD. INTERVENTION: 1:1 randomization to receive vadadustat or darbepoetin alfa. OUTCOMES: The primary safety end point was the time to first MACE. RESULTS: At baseline, patients in Europe (n=444) were primarily treated with darbepoetin alfa, showed higher proportions on low ESA doses (<90 U/kg/wk epoetin alfa equivalents) with a hemoglobin concentration of ≥10 g/dL compared with patients in the US (n=665) and non-US/non-Europe (n=614) regions. The MACE rates per 100 person-years in the 3 vadadustat groups across regions were 14.5 in the US, 11.6 in Europe, and 10.0 in the non-US/non-Europe groups, whereas event rates in the darbepoetin alfa group were considerably lower in Europe than in the US and non-US/non-Europe groups (6.7 vs 13.3 and 10.5, respectively). The overall hazard ratio for MACE for vadadustat vs darbepoetin alpha was 1.16; 95% CI, 0.93-1.45, but varied by geographical region, with a greater hazard ratio seen in Europe (US, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.78-1.46; Europe, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.24-3.39; non-US/non-Europe, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.60-1.37); interaction between study treatment and geographical region, P = 0.07). In Europe, ESA rescue was associated with a higher risk of MACE in both groups. LIMITATIONS: Several analyses are exploratory. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, there was a low risk of MACE in the darbepoetin alfa group in Europe. Patients in Europe were generally on low doses of ESA, with hemoglobin already within target range. The low risk of MACE may have been related to a limited need to switch and titrate darbepoetin alfa compared with the non-US/non-Europe group. FUNDING: Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02680574 Elsevier 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10329165/ /pubmed/37427292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100667 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Parfrey, Patrick S.
Burke, Steven K.
Chertow, Glenn M.
Eckardt, Kai-Uwe
Jardine, Alan G.
Lewis, Eldrin F.
Luo, Wenli
Matsushita, Kunihiro
McCullough, Peter A.
Minga, Todd
Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
Safety Endpoints With Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With Non–Dialysis-Dependent CKD: A Post Hoc Regional Analysis of the PRO(2)TECT Randomized Clinical Trial of ESA-Treated Patients
title Safety Endpoints With Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With Non–Dialysis-Dependent CKD: A Post Hoc Regional Analysis of the PRO(2)TECT Randomized Clinical Trial of ESA-Treated Patients
title_full Safety Endpoints With Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With Non–Dialysis-Dependent CKD: A Post Hoc Regional Analysis of the PRO(2)TECT Randomized Clinical Trial of ESA-Treated Patients
title_fullStr Safety Endpoints With Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With Non–Dialysis-Dependent CKD: A Post Hoc Regional Analysis of the PRO(2)TECT Randomized Clinical Trial of ESA-Treated Patients
title_full_unstemmed Safety Endpoints With Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With Non–Dialysis-Dependent CKD: A Post Hoc Regional Analysis of the PRO(2)TECT Randomized Clinical Trial of ESA-Treated Patients
title_short Safety Endpoints With Vadadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa in Patients With Non–Dialysis-Dependent CKD: A Post Hoc Regional Analysis of the PRO(2)TECT Randomized Clinical Trial of ESA-Treated Patients
title_sort safety endpoints with vadadustat versus darbepoetin alfa in patients with non–dialysis-dependent ckd: a post hoc regional analysis of the pro(2)tect randomized clinical trial of esa-treated patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37427292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100667
work_keys_str_mv AT parfreypatricks safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients
AT burkestevenk safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients
AT chertowglennm safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients
AT eckardtkaiuwe safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients
AT jardinealang safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients
AT lewiseldrinf safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients
AT luowenli safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients
AT matsushitakunihiro safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients
AT mcculloughpetera safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients
AT mingatodd safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients
AT winkelmayerwolfgangc safetyendpointswithvadadustatversusdarbepoetinalfainpatientswithnondialysisdependentckdaposthocregionalanalysisofthepro2tectrandomizedclinicaltrialofesatreatedpatients