Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery
OBJECTIVES: Comparing stone-free rates and associated outcome measures between two surgical modalities of lithotripsy fragmentation and removal or spontaneous passage of dust during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS: In March 2023, we conducted a literature search in several widely used...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01283-w |
_version_ | 1785069991939276800 |
---|---|
author | Wen, Zhi Wang, Li Liu, Yang Huang, Jing Chen, Cai-Xia Wang, Chong-Jian Chen, Lin-Lin Yang, Xue-song |
author_facet | Wen, Zhi Wang, Li Liu, Yang Huang, Jing Chen, Cai-Xia Wang, Chong-Jian Chen, Lin-Lin Yang, Xue-song |
author_sort | Wen, Zhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Comparing stone-free rates and associated outcome measures between two surgical modalities of lithotripsy fragmentation and removal or spontaneous passage of dust during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS: In March 2023, we conducted a literature search in several widely used databases worldwide, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We only considered English articles and excluded pediatric patients. Reviews and protocols without any published data were excluded. We also excluded articles with conference abstracts and irrelevant content. We used the Cochran-Mantel–Haenszel method and random-effects models to assess inverse variances and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mean differences in categorical variables. The results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Our final meta-analysis included nine articles, comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven cohort studies. The total number of patients included in these studies was 1326, and all studies used holmium laser lithotripsy. The pooled analysis of the dust and fragmentation groups showed that the fragmentation group had a higher stone-free rate (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.41 – 0.89; p = 0.01); the dust group had a shorter operative time (WMD – 11.6 min; 95% CI – 19.56 – –3.63; p = 0.004); and the dust group had a higher retreatment rate (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.31 – 3.13; p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay, overall complications, or postoperative fever. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that both procedures could be safely and effectively used for upper ureteral and renal calculi lithotripsy, the dust group had potential advantages over the fragmentation group in terms of the operation time, and the fragmentation group had certain advantages in terms of stone-free rate and retreatment rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10329318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103293182023-07-09 A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery Wen, Zhi Wang, Li Liu, Yang Huang, Jing Chen, Cai-Xia Wang, Chong-Jian Chen, Lin-Lin Yang, Xue-song BMC Urol Research OBJECTIVES: Comparing stone-free rates and associated outcome measures between two surgical modalities of lithotripsy fragmentation and removal or spontaneous passage of dust during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS: In March 2023, we conducted a literature search in several widely used databases worldwide, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We only considered English articles and excluded pediatric patients. Reviews and protocols without any published data were excluded. We also excluded articles with conference abstracts and irrelevant content. We used the Cochran-Mantel–Haenszel method and random-effects models to assess inverse variances and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mean differences in categorical variables. The results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Our final meta-analysis included nine articles, comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven cohort studies. The total number of patients included in these studies was 1326, and all studies used holmium laser lithotripsy. The pooled analysis of the dust and fragmentation groups showed that the fragmentation group had a higher stone-free rate (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.41 – 0.89; p = 0.01); the dust group had a shorter operative time (WMD – 11.6 min; 95% CI – 19.56 – –3.63; p = 0.004); and the dust group had a higher retreatment rate (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.31 – 3.13; p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay, overall complications, or postoperative fever. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that both procedures could be safely and effectively used for upper ureteral and renal calculi lithotripsy, the dust group had potential advantages over the fragmentation group in terms of the operation time, and the fragmentation group had certain advantages in terms of stone-free rate and retreatment rate. BioMed Central 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10329318/ /pubmed/37420203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01283-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wen, Zhi Wang, Li Liu, Yang Huang, Jing Chen, Cai-Xia Wang, Chong-Jian Chen, Lin-Lin Yang, Xue-song A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01283-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenzhi asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT wangli asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT liuyang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT huangjing asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT chencaixia asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT wangchongjian asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT chenlinlin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT yangxuesong asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT wenzhi systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT wangli systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT liuyang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT huangjing systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT chencaixia systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT wangchongjian systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT chenlinlin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery AT yangxuesong systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery |