Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery

OBJECTIVES: Comparing stone-free rates and associated outcome measures between two surgical modalities of lithotripsy fragmentation and removal or spontaneous passage of dust during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS: In March 2023, we conducted a literature search in several widely used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Zhi, Wang, Li, Liu, Yang, Huang, Jing, Chen, Cai-Xia, Wang, Chong-Jian, Chen, Lin-Lin, Yang, Xue-song
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01283-w
_version_ 1785069991939276800
author Wen, Zhi
Wang, Li
Liu, Yang
Huang, Jing
Chen, Cai-Xia
Wang, Chong-Jian
Chen, Lin-Lin
Yang, Xue-song
author_facet Wen, Zhi
Wang, Li
Liu, Yang
Huang, Jing
Chen, Cai-Xia
Wang, Chong-Jian
Chen, Lin-Lin
Yang, Xue-song
author_sort Wen, Zhi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Comparing stone-free rates and associated outcome measures between two surgical modalities of lithotripsy fragmentation and removal or spontaneous passage of dust during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS: In March 2023, we conducted a literature search in several widely used databases worldwide, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We only considered English articles and excluded pediatric patients. Reviews and protocols without any published data were excluded. We also excluded articles with conference abstracts and irrelevant content. We used the Cochran-Mantel–Haenszel method and random-effects models to assess inverse variances and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mean differences in categorical variables. The results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Our final meta-analysis included nine articles, comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven cohort studies. The total number of patients included in these studies was 1326, and all studies used holmium laser lithotripsy. The pooled analysis of the dust and fragmentation groups showed that the fragmentation group had a higher stone-free rate (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.41 – 0.89; p = 0.01); the dust group had a shorter operative time (WMD – 11.6 min; 95% CI – 19.56 – –3.63; p = 0.004); and the dust group had a higher retreatment rate (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.31 – 3.13; p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay, overall complications, or postoperative fever. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that both procedures could be safely and effectively used for upper ureteral and renal calculi lithotripsy, the dust group had potential advantages over the fragmentation group in terms of the operation time, and the fragmentation group had certain advantages in terms of stone-free rate and retreatment rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10329318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103293182023-07-09 A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery Wen, Zhi Wang, Li Liu, Yang Huang, Jing Chen, Cai-Xia Wang, Chong-Jian Chen, Lin-Lin Yang, Xue-song BMC Urol Research OBJECTIVES: Comparing stone-free rates and associated outcome measures between two surgical modalities of lithotripsy fragmentation and removal or spontaneous passage of dust during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS: In March 2023, we conducted a literature search in several widely used databases worldwide, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We only considered English articles and excluded pediatric patients. Reviews and protocols without any published data were excluded. We also excluded articles with conference abstracts and irrelevant content. We used the Cochran-Mantel–Haenszel method and random-effects models to assess inverse variances and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mean differences in categorical variables. The results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Our final meta-analysis included nine articles, comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven cohort studies. The total number of patients included in these studies was 1326, and all studies used holmium laser lithotripsy. The pooled analysis of the dust and fragmentation groups showed that the fragmentation group had a higher stone-free rate (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.41 – 0.89; p = 0.01); the dust group had a shorter operative time (WMD – 11.6 min; 95% CI – 19.56 – –3.63; p = 0.004); and the dust group had a higher retreatment rate (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.31 – 3.13; p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of length of hospital stay, overall complications, or postoperative fever. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that both procedures could be safely and effectively used for upper ureteral and renal calculi lithotripsy, the dust group had potential advantages over the fragmentation group in terms of the operation time, and the fragmentation group had certain advantages in terms of stone-free rate and retreatment rate. BioMed Central 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10329318/ /pubmed/37420203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01283-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wen, Zhi
Wang, Li
Liu, Yang
Huang, Jing
Chen, Cai-Xia
Wang, Chong-Jian
Chen, Lin-Lin
Yang, Xue-song
A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes between dusting and fragmentation in retrograde intrarenal surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01283-w
work_keys_str_mv AT wenzhi asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT wangli asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT liuyang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT huangjing asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT chencaixia asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT wangchongjian asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT chenlinlin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT yangxuesong asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT wenzhi systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT wangli systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT liuyang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT huangjing systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT chencaixia systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT wangchongjian systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT chenlinlin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery
AT yangxuesong systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofoutcomesbetweendustingandfragmentationinretrogradeintrarenalsurgery