Cargando…

A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation

BACKGROUND: Airway opening pressure (AOP) detection and measurement are essential for assessing respiratory mechanics and adapting ventilation. We propose a novel approach for AOP assessment during volume assist control ventilation at a usual constant-flow rate of 60 L/min. OBJECTIVES: To validate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur, Moncomble, Elsa, Lesimple, Arnaud, Delamaire, Flora, Louis, Bruno, Mekontso Dessap, Armand, Mercat, Alain, Richard, Jean-Christophe, Beloncle, François, Carteaux, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0
_version_ 1785070005429207040
author Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur
Moncomble, Elsa
Lesimple, Arnaud
Delamaire, Flora
Louis, Bruno
Mekontso Dessap, Armand
Mercat, Alain
Richard, Jean-Christophe
Beloncle, François
Carteaux, Guillaume
author_facet Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur
Moncomble, Elsa
Lesimple, Arnaud
Delamaire, Flora
Louis, Bruno
Mekontso Dessap, Armand
Mercat, Alain
Richard, Jean-Christophe
Beloncle, François
Carteaux, Guillaume
author_sort Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Airway opening pressure (AOP) detection and measurement are essential for assessing respiratory mechanics and adapting ventilation. We propose a novel approach for AOP assessment during volume assist control ventilation at a usual constant-flow rate of 60 L/min. OBJECTIVES: To validate the conductive pressure (P(cond)) method, which compare the P(cond)—defined on the airway pressure waveform as the difference between the airway pressure level at which an abrupt change in slope occurs at the beginning of insufflation and PEEP—to resistive pressure for AOP detection and measurement, and to compare its respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance to the standard low-flow insufflation method. METHODS: The proof-of-concept of the P(cond) method was assessed on mechanical (lung simulator) and physiological (cadavers) bench models. Its diagnostic performance was evaluated in 213 patients, using the standard low-flow insufflation method as a reference. In 45 patients, the respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance of the P(cond) method was compared with the standard low-flow method. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Bench assessments validated the P(cond) method proof-of-concept. Sensitivity and specificity of the P(cond) method for AOP detection were 93% and 91%, respectively. AOP obtained by P(cond) and standard low-flow methods strongly correlated (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Changes in SpO(2) were significantly lower during P(cond) than during standard method (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Determination of P(cond) during constant-flow assist control ventilation may permit to easily and safely detect and measure AOP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10329375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103293752023-07-09 A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur Moncomble, Elsa Lesimple, Arnaud Delamaire, Flora Louis, Bruno Mekontso Dessap, Armand Mercat, Alain Richard, Jean-Christophe Beloncle, François Carteaux, Guillaume Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Airway opening pressure (AOP) detection and measurement are essential for assessing respiratory mechanics and adapting ventilation. We propose a novel approach for AOP assessment during volume assist control ventilation at a usual constant-flow rate of 60 L/min. OBJECTIVES: To validate the conductive pressure (P(cond)) method, which compare the P(cond)—defined on the airway pressure waveform as the difference between the airway pressure level at which an abrupt change in slope occurs at the beginning of insufflation and PEEP—to resistive pressure for AOP detection and measurement, and to compare its respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance to the standard low-flow insufflation method. METHODS: The proof-of-concept of the P(cond) method was assessed on mechanical (lung simulator) and physiological (cadavers) bench models. Its diagnostic performance was evaluated in 213 patients, using the standard low-flow insufflation method as a reference. In 45 patients, the respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance of the P(cond) method was compared with the standard low-flow method. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Bench assessments validated the P(cond) method proof-of-concept. Sensitivity and specificity of the P(cond) method for AOP detection were 93% and 91%, respectively. AOP obtained by P(cond) and standard low-flow methods strongly correlated (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Changes in SpO(2) were significantly lower during P(cond) than during standard method (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Determination of P(cond) during constant-flow assist control ventilation may permit to easily and safely detect and measure AOP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0. BioMed Central 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10329375/ /pubmed/37420282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur
Moncomble, Elsa
Lesimple, Arnaud
Delamaire, Flora
Louis, Bruno
Mekontso Dessap, Armand
Mercat, Alain
Richard, Jean-Christophe
Beloncle, François
Carteaux, Guillaume
A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation
title A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation
title_full A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation
title_fullStr A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation
title_full_unstemmed A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation
title_short A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation
title_sort novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0
work_keys_str_mv AT haudebourgannefleur anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT moncombleelsa anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT lesimplearnaud anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT delamaireflora anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT louisbruno anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT mekontsodessaparmand anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT mercatalain anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT richardjeanchristophe anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT belonclefrancois anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT carteauxguillaume anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT haudebourgannefleur novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT moncombleelsa novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT lesimplearnaud novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT delamaireflora novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT louisbruno novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT mekontsodessaparmand novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT mercatalain novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT richardjeanchristophe novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT belonclefrancois novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation
AT carteauxguillaume novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation