Cargando…
A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation
BACKGROUND: Airway opening pressure (AOP) detection and measurement are essential for assessing respiratory mechanics and adapting ventilation. We propose a novel approach for AOP assessment during volume assist control ventilation at a usual constant-flow rate of 60 L/min. OBJECTIVES: To validate t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0 |
_version_ | 1785070005429207040 |
---|---|
author | Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur Moncomble, Elsa Lesimple, Arnaud Delamaire, Flora Louis, Bruno Mekontso Dessap, Armand Mercat, Alain Richard, Jean-Christophe Beloncle, François Carteaux, Guillaume |
author_facet | Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur Moncomble, Elsa Lesimple, Arnaud Delamaire, Flora Louis, Bruno Mekontso Dessap, Armand Mercat, Alain Richard, Jean-Christophe Beloncle, François Carteaux, Guillaume |
author_sort | Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Airway opening pressure (AOP) detection and measurement are essential for assessing respiratory mechanics and adapting ventilation. We propose a novel approach for AOP assessment during volume assist control ventilation at a usual constant-flow rate of 60 L/min. OBJECTIVES: To validate the conductive pressure (P(cond)) method, which compare the P(cond)—defined on the airway pressure waveform as the difference between the airway pressure level at which an abrupt change in slope occurs at the beginning of insufflation and PEEP—to resistive pressure for AOP detection and measurement, and to compare its respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance to the standard low-flow insufflation method. METHODS: The proof-of-concept of the P(cond) method was assessed on mechanical (lung simulator) and physiological (cadavers) bench models. Its diagnostic performance was evaluated in 213 patients, using the standard low-flow insufflation method as a reference. In 45 patients, the respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance of the P(cond) method was compared with the standard low-flow method. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Bench assessments validated the P(cond) method proof-of-concept. Sensitivity and specificity of the P(cond) method for AOP detection were 93% and 91%, respectively. AOP obtained by P(cond) and standard low-flow methods strongly correlated (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Changes in SpO(2) were significantly lower during P(cond) than during standard method (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Determination of P(cond) during constant-flow assist control ventilation may permit to easily and safely detect and measure AOP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10329375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103293752023-07-09 A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur Moncomble, Elsa Lesimple, Arnaud Delamaire, Flora Louis, Bruno Mekontso Dessap, Armand Mercat, Alain Richard, Jean-Christophe Beloncle, François Carteaux, Guillaume Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Airway opening pressure (AOP) detection and measurement are essential for assessing respiratory mechanics and adapting ventilation. We propose a novel approach for AOP assessment during volume assist control ventilation at a usual constant-flow rate of 60 L/min. OBJECTIVES: To validate the conductive pressure (P(cond)) method, which compare the P(cond)—defined on the airway pressure waveform as the difference between the airway pressure level at which an abrupt change in slope occurs at the beginning of insufflation and PEEP—to resistive pressure for AOP detection and measurement, and to compare its respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance to the standard low-flow insufflation method. METHODS: The proof-of-concept of the P(cond) method was assessed on mechanical (lung simulator) and physiological (cadavers) bench models. Its diagnostic performance was evaluated in 213 patients, using the standard low-flow insufflation method as a reference. In 45 patients, the respiratory and hemodynamic tolerance of the P(cond) method was compared with the standard low-flow method. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Bench assessments validated the P(cond) method proof-of-concept. Sensitivity and specificity of the P(cond) method for AOP detection were 93% and 91%, respectively. AOP obtained by P(cond) and standard low-flow methods strongly correlated (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Changes in SpO(2) were significantly lower during P(cond) than during standard method (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Determination of P(cond) during constant-flow assist control ventilation may permit to easily and safely detect and measure AOP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0. BioMed Central 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10329375/ /pubmed/37420282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Haudebourg, Anne-Fleur Moncomble, Elsa Lesimple, Arnaud Delamaire, Flora Louis, Bruno Mekontso Dessap, Armand Mercat, Alain Richard, Jean-Christophe Beloncle, François Carteaux, Guillaume A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation |
title | A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation |
title_full | A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation |
title_fullStr | A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation |
title_short | A novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation |
title_sort | novel method for assessment of airway opening pressure without the need for low-flow insufflation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04560-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haudebourgannefleur anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT moncombleelsa anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT lesimplearnaud anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT delamaireflora anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT louisbruno anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT mekontsodessaparmand anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT mercatalain anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT richardjeanchristophe anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT belonclefrancois anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT carteauxguillaume anovelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT haudebourgannefleur novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT moncombleelsa novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT lesimplearnaud novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT delamaireflora novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT louisbruno novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT mekontsodessaparmand novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT mercatalain novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT richardjeanchristophe novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT belonclefrancois novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation AT carteauxguillaume novelmethodforassessmentofairwayopeningpressurewithouttheneedforlowflowinsufflation |