Cargando…

Influence of the Amount of Toothpaste on Cleaning Efficacy: An In Vitro Study

Objectives  The aim of this in vitro study was to test the influence of the amount of toothpaste on enamel cleaning efficacy. Materials and Methods  The hydrated silica-based test toothpaste (radioactive dentin abrasion: 60.19 ± 1.35) contained all ingredients of a regular fluoride toothpaste. The c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarembe, Sandra, Ufer, Carolin, Kiesow, Andreas, Limeback, Hardy, Meyer, Frederic, Fuhrmann, Ines, Enax, Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35785824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1747953
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives  The aim of this in vitro study was to test the influence of the amount of toothpaste on enamel cleaning efficacy. Materials and Methods  The hydrated silica-based test toothpaste (radioactive dentin abrasion: 60.19 ± 1.35) contained all ingredients of a regular fluoride toothpaste. The cleaning efficacy of four different toothpaste amounts (1.00 g, 0.50 g [both “full length of brush”], 0.25 g [“pea-size”], and 0.125 g [“grain of rice-size”]) diluted in 1.00 mL water were each tested for different brushing times (10, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 300 seconds) using a standardized staining model on human molars with a brushing machine. Photographic documentation and colorimetric measurements were conducted, respectively, initially, after staining and after each brushing step. Colorimetric measurements were used to calculate the stain removal (in %). Statistical Analysis  Results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test and Levene's test for analysis of homogeneity of variance. The level of significance α was set at ≤ 0.05. Results  The cleaning efficacy decreased significantly when using smaller toothpaste amounts. Stain removal after 120 seconds brushing time was: 77.4 ± 5.0% (1.00 g toothpaste), 75.7 ± 3.4% (0.50 g toothpaste), 54.1 ± 6.7% (0.25 g toothpaste), and 48.2 ± 7.1% (0.125 g toothpaste), respectively. Conclusion  In this in vitro study the cleaning efficacy of a medium-abrasive, hydrated silica-based toothpaste was analyzed. Note that 1.00 g toothpaste showed for all brushing times a significantly higher cleaning efficacy than 0.25 g toothpaste and 0.125 g toothpaste.