Cargando…

Tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the partial-thickness non-advanced tunnel technique (TUN) versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF), both combined with a connective tissue graft, in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (83 teeth) affected b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González-Febles, Jerián, Romandini, Mario, Laciar-Oudshoorn, Florencia, Noguerol, Fernando, Marruganti, Crystal, Bujaldón-Daza, Antonio, Zabalegui, Ion, Sanz, Mariano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36988824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04975-7
_version_ 1785070050416263168
author González-Febles, Jerián
Romandini, Mario
Laciar-Oudshoorn, Florencia
Noguerol, Fernando
Marruganti, Crystal
Bujaldón-Daza, Antonio
Zabalegui, Ion
Sanz, Mariano
author_facet González-Febles, Jerián
Romandini, Mario
Laciar-Oudshoorn, Florencia
Noguerol, Fernando
Marruganti, Crystal
Bujaldón-Daza, Antonio
Zabalegui, Ion
Sanz, Mariano
author_sort González-Febles, Jerián
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the partial-thickness non-advanced tunnel technique (TUN) versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF), both combined with a connective tissue graft, in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (83 teeth) affected by multiple gingival recessions were treated in two clinical centers with either the test (TUN) or the control (CAF) intervention combined with a connective tissue graft. Outcomes at 3 and 6 months after surgery included complete root coverage (CRC—primary outcome), mean root coverage (mRC), changes in recession depth (RD), probing pocket depth (PPD), and keratinized tissue height (KT). Root sensitivity and root coverage esthetic score (RES) were also evaluated at 6-month examination. Surgery duration, wound healing index (WHI), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were additionally considered. RESULTS: At 6 months, CRC was observed in 80.9% and 79.5% of the teeth treated with TUN and CAF, respectively (odds ratio = 1.2; p = 0.802). No differences between groups were also observed in terms of mRC (TUN = 94.0%; CAF = 91.1%), RD and PPD reductions, root sensitivity, RES, and WHI. KT increase was significantly higher in teeth treated with TUN (Difference in Means – MD =  − 1.0 mm; p = 0.001). Surgery duration was shorter (MD =  − 19.3 min; p = 0.001), and patients reported less intra-surgical pain (MD =  − 16.4; p = 0.028) as well as postoperative morbidity in TUN compared with CAF. CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical interventions showed a similar efficacy in terms of root coverage, albeit TUN was associated with a higher increase in KT and with a milder patient’s surgical experience. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both techniques have shown similar efficacy for the coverage of exposed root surfaces, although clinicians may consider TUN as less invasive. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05122468) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-023-04975-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10329586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103295862023-07-10 Tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial González-Febles, Jerián Romandini, Mario Laciar-Oudshoorn, Florencia Noguerol, Fernando Marruganti, Crystal Bujaldón-Daza, Antonio Zabalegui, Ion Sanz, Mariano Clin Oral Investig Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the partial-thickness non-advanced tunnel technique (TUN) versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF), both combined with a connective tissue graft, in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (83 teeth) affected by multiple gingival recessions were treated in two clinical centers with either the test (TUN) or the control (CAF) intervention combined with a connective tissue graft. Outcomes at 3 and 6 months after surgery included complete root coverage (CRC—primary outcome), mean root coverage (mRC), changes in recession depth (RD), probing pocket depth (PPD), and keratinized tissue height (KT). Root sensitivity and root coverage esthetic score (RES) were also evaluated at 6-month examination. Surgery duration, wound healing index (WHI), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were additionally considered. RESULTS: At 6 months, CRC was observed in 80.9% and 79.5% of the teeth treated with TUN and CAF, respectively (odds ratio = 1.2; p = 0.802). No differences between groups were also observed in terms of mRC (TUN = 94.0%; CAF = 91.1%), RD and PPD reductions, root sensitivity, RES, and WHI. KT increase was significantly higher in teeth treated with TUN (Difference in Means – MD =  − 1.0 mm; p = 0.001). Surgery duration was shorter (MD =  − 19.3 min; p = 0.001), and patients reported less intra-surgical pain (MD =  − 16.4; p = 0.028) as well as postoperative morbidity in TUN compared with CAF. CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical interventions showed a similar efficacy in terms of root coverage, albeit TUN was associated with a higher increase in KT and with a milder patient’s surgical experience. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both techniques have shown similar efficacy for the coverage of exposed root surfaces, although clinicians may consider TUN as less invasive. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05122468) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-023-04975-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10329586/ /pubmed/36988824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04975-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
González-Febles, Jerián
Romandini, Mario
Laciar-Oudshoorn, Florencia
Noguerol, Fernando
Marruganti, Crystal
Bujaldón-Daza, Antonio
Zabalegui, Ion
Sanz, Mariano
Tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial
title Tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial
title_full Tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial
title_short Tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial
title_sort tunnel vs. coronally advanced flap in combination with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a multi-center randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36988824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04975-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezfeblesjerian tunnelvscoronallyadvancedflapincombinationwithaconnectivetissuegraftforthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT romandinimario tunnelvscoronallyadvancedflapincombinationwithaconnectivetissuegraftforthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT laciaroudshoornflorencia tunnelvscoronallyadvancedflapincombinationwithaconnectivetissuegraftforthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT noguerolfernando tunnelvscoronallyadvancedflapincombinationwithaconnectivetissuegraftforthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT marruganticrystal tunnelvscoronallyadvancedflapincombinationwithaconnectivetissuegraftforthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bujaldondazaantonio tunnelvscoronallyadvancedflapincombinationwithaconnectivetissuegraftforthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zabaleguiion tunnelvscoronallyadvancedflapincombinationwithaconnectivetissuegraftforthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sanzmariano tunnelvscoronallyadvancedflapincombinationwithaconnectivetissuegraftforthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial