Cargando…
Global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions
Atmospheric methane is both a potent greenhouse gas and photochemically active, with approximately equal anthropogenic and natural sources. The addition of chlorine to the atmosphere has been proposed to mitigate global warming through methane reduction by increasing its chemical loss. However, the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37422475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39794-7 |
_version_ | 1785070060933480448 |
---|---|
author | Li, Qinyi Meidan, Daphne Hess, Peter Añel, Juan A. Cuevas, Carlos A. Doney, Scott Fernandez, Rafael P. van Herpen, Maarten Höglund-Isaksson, Lena Johnson, Matthew S. Kinnison, Douglas E. Lamarque, Jean-François Röckmann, Thomas Mahowald, Natalie M. Saiz-Lopez, Alfonso |
author_facet | Li, Qinyi Meidan, Daphne Hess, Peter Añel, Juan A. Cuevas, Carlos A. Doney, Scott Fernandez, Rafael P. van Herpen, Maarten Höglund-Isaksson, Lena Johnson, Matthew S. Kinnison, Douglas E. Lamarque, Jean-François Röckmann, Thomas Mahowald, Natalie M. Saiz-Lopez, Alfonso |
author_sort | Li, Qinyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Atmospheric methane is both a potent greenhouse gas and photochemically active, with approximately equal anthropogenic and natural sources. The addition of chlorine to the atmosphere has been proposed to mitigate global warming through methane reduction by increasing its chemical loss. However, the potential environmental impacts of such climate mitigation remain unexplored. Here, sensitivity studies are conducted to evaluate the possible effects of increasing reactive chlorine emissions on the methane budget, atmospheric composition and radiative forcing. Because of non-linear chemistry, in order to achieve a reduction in methane burden (instead of an increase), the chlorine atom burden needs to be a minimum of three times the estimated present-day burden. If the methane removal target is set to 20%, 45%, or 70% less global methane by 2050 compared to the levels in the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 scenario (RCP8.5), our modeling results suggest that additional chlorine fluxes of 630, 1250, and 1880 Tg Cl/year, respectively, are needed. The results show that increasing chlorine emissions also induces significant changes in other important climate forcers. Remarkably, the tropospheric ozone decrease is large enough that the magnitude of radiative forcing decrease is similar to that of methane. Adding 630, 1250, and 1880 Tg Cl/year to the RCP8.5 scenario, chosen to have the most consistent current-day trends of methane, will decrease the surface temperature by 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 °C by 2050, respectively. The quantity and method in which the chlorine is added, its interactions with climate pathways, and the potential environmental impacts on air quality and ocean acidity, must be carefully considered before any action is taken. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10329632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103296322023-07-10 Global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions Li, Qinyi Meidan, Daphne Hess, Peter Añel, Juan A. Cuevas, Carlos A. Doney, Scott Fernandez, Rafael P. van Herpen, Maarten Höglund-Isaksson, Lena Johnson, Matthew S. Kinnison, Douglas E. Lamarque, Jean-François Röckmann, Thomas Mahowald, Natalie M. Saiz-Lopez, Alfonso Nat Commun Article Atmospheric methane is both a potent greenhouse gas and photochemically active, with approximately equal anthropogenic and natural sources. The addition of chlorine to the atmosphere has been proposed to mitigate global warming through methane reduction by increasing its chemical loss. However, the potential environmental impacts of such climate mitigation remain unexplored. Here, sensitivity studies are conducted to evaluate the possible effects of increasing reactive chlorine emissions on the methane budget, atmospheric composition and radiative forcing. Because of non-linear chemistry, in order to achieve a reduction in methane burden (instead of an increase), the chlorine atom burden needs to be a minimum of three times the estimated present-day burden. If the methane removal target is set to 20%, 45%, or 70% less global methane by 2050 compared to the levels in the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 scenario (RCP8.5), our modeling results suggest that additional chlorine fluxes of 630, 1250, and 1880 Tg Cl/year, respectively, are needed. The results show that increasing chlorine emissions also induces significant changes in other important climate forcers. Remarkably, the tropospheric ozone decrease is large enough that the magnitude of radiative forcing decrease is similar to that of methane. Adding 630, 1250, and 1880 Tg Cl/year to the RCP8.5 scenario, chosen to have the most consistent current-day trends of methane, will decrease the surface temperature by 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 °C by 2050, respectively. The quantity and method in which the chlorine is added, its interactions with climate pathways, and the potential environmental impacts on air quality and ocean acidity, must be carefully considered before any action is taken. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10329632/ /pubmed/37422475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39794-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Qinyi Meidan, Daphne Hess, Peter Añel, Juan A. Cuevas, Carlos A. Doney, Scott Fernandez, Rafael P. van Herpen, Maarten Höglund-Isaksson, Lena Johnson, Matthew S. Kinnison, Douglas E. Lamarque, Jean-François Röckmann, Thomas Mahowald, Natalie M. Saiz-Lopez, Alfonso Global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions |
title | Global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions |
title_full | Global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions |
title_fullStr | Global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions |
title_full_unstemmed | Global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions |
title_short | Global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions |
title_sort | global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37422475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39794-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liqinyi globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT meidandaphne globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT hesspeter globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT aneljuana globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT cuevascarlosa globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT doneyscott globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT fernandezrafaelp globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT vanherpenmaarten globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT hoglundisakssonlena globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT johnsonmatthews globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT kinnisondouglase globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT lamarquejeanfrancois globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT rockmannthomas globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT mahowaldnataliem globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions AT saizlopezalfonso globalenvironmentalimplicationsofatmosphericmethaneremovalthroughchlorinemediatedchemistryclimateinteractions |