Cargando…

Genomic copy number variability at the genus, species and population levels impacts in situ ecological analyses of dinoflagellates and harmful algal blooms

The application of meta-barcoding, qPCR, and metagenomics to aquatic eukaryotic microbial communities requires knowledge of genomic copy number variability (CNV). CNV may be particularly relevant to functional genes, impacting dosage and expression, yet little is known of the scale and role of CNV i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruvindy, Rendy, Barua, Abanti, Bolch, Christopher J. S., Sarowar, Chowdhury, Savela, Henna, Murray, Shauna A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37422553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-023-00274-0
_version_ 1785070068571308032
author Ruvindy, Rendy
Barua, Abanti
Bolch, Christopher J. S.
Sarowar, Chowdhury
Savela, Henna
Murray, Shauna A.
author_facet Ruvindy, Rendy
Barua, Abanti
Bolch, Christopher J. S.
Sarowar, Chowdhury
Savela, Henna
Murray, Shauna A.
author_sort Ruvindy, Rendy
collection PubMed
description The application of meta-barcoding, qPCR, and metagenomics to aquatic eukaryotic microbial communities requires knowledge of genomic copy number variability (CNV). CNV may be particularly relevant to functional genes, impacting dosage and expression, yet little is known of the scale and role of CNV in microbial eukaryotes. Here, we quantify CNV of rRNA and a gene involved in Paralytic Shellfish Toxin (PST) synthesis (sxtA4), in 51 strains of 4 Alexandrium (Dinophyceae) species. Genomes varied up to threefold within species and ~7-fold amongst species, with the largest (A. pacificum, 130 ± 1.3 pg cell(−1) /~127 Gbp) in the largest size category of any eukaryote. Genomic copy numbers (GCN) of rRNA varied by 6 orders of magnitude amongst Alexandrium (10(2)– 10(8) copies cell(−1)) and were significantly related to genome size. Within the population CNV of rRNA was 2 orders of magnitude (10(5) – 10(7) cell(−1)) in 15 isolates from one population, demonstrating that quantitative data based on rRNA genes needs considerable caution in interpretation, even if validated against locally isolated strains. Despite up to 30 years in laboratory culture, rRNA CNV and genome size variability were not correlated with time in culture. Cell volume was only weakly associated with rRNA GCN (20–22% variance explained across dinoflagellates, 4% in Gonyaulacales). GCN of sxtA4 varied from 0–10(2) copies cell(−1), was significantly related to PSTs (ng cell(−1)), displaying a gene dosage effect modulating PST production. Our data indicate that in dinoflagellates, a major marine eukaryotic group, low-copy functional genes are more reliable and informative targets for quantification of ecological processes than unstable rRNA genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10329664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103296642023-07-10 Genomic copy number variability at the genus, species and population levels impacts in situ ecological analyses of dinoflagellates and harmful algal blooms Ruvindy, Rendy Barua, Abanti Bolch, Christopher J. S. Sarowar, Chowdhury Savela, Henna Murray, Shauna A. ISME Commun Article The application of meta-barcoding, qPCR, and metagenomics to aquatic eukaryotic microbial communities requires knowledge of genomic copy number variability (CNV). CNV may be particularly relevant to functional genes, impacting dosage and expression, yet little is known of the scale and role of CNV in microbial eukaryotes. Here, we quantify CNV of rRNA and a gene involved in Paralytic Shellfish Toxin (PST) synthesis (sxtA4), in 51 strains of 4 Alexandrium (Dinophyceae) species. Genomes varied up to threefold within species and ~7-fold amongst species, with the largest (A. pacificum, 130 ± 1.3 pg cell(−1) /~127 Gbp) in the largest size category of any eukaryote. Genomic copy numbers (GCN) of rRNA varied by 6 orders of magnitude amongst Alexandrium (10(2)– 10(8) copies cell(−1)) and were significantly related to genome size. Within the population CNV of rRNA was 2 orders of magnitude (10(5) – 10(7) cell(−1)) in 15 isolates from one population, demonstrating that quantitative data based on rRNA genes needs considerable caution in interpretation, even if validated against locally isolated strains. Despite up to 30 years in laboratory culture, rRNA CNV and genome size variability were not correlated with time in culture. Cell volume was only weakly associated with rRNA GCN (20–22% variance explained across dinoflagellates, 4% in Gonyaulacales). GCN of sxtA4 varied from 0–10(2) copies cell(−1), was significantly related to PSTs (ng cell(−1)), displaying a gene dosage effect modulating PST production. Our data indicate that in dinoflagellates, a major marine eukaryotic group, low-copy functional genes are more reliable and informative targets for quantification of ecological processes than unstable rRNA genes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10329664/ /pubmed/37422553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-023-00274-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ruvindy, Rendy
Barua, Abanti
Bolch, Christopher J. S.
Sarowar, Chowdhury
Savela, Henna
Murray, Shauna A.
Genomic copy number variability at the genus, species and population levels impacts in situ ecological analyses of dinoflagellates and harmful algal blooms
title Genomic copy number variability at the genus, species and population levels impacts in situ ecological analyses of dinoflagellates and harmful algal blooms
title_full Genomic copy number variability at the genus, species and population levels impacts in situ ecological analyses of dinoflagellates and harmful algal blooms
title_fullStr Genomic copy number variability at the genus, species and population levels impacts in situ ecological analyses of dinoflagellates and harmful algal blooms
title_full_unstemmed Genomic copy number variability at the genus, species and population levels impacts in situ ecological analyses of dinoflagellates and harmful algal blooms
title_short Genomic copy number variability at the genus, species and population levels impacts in situ ecological analyses of dinoflagellates and harmful algal blooms
title_sort genomic copy number variability at the genus, species and population levels impacts in situ ecological analyses of dinoflagellates and harmful algal blooms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37422553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43705-023-00274-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ruvindyrendy genomiccopynumbervariabilityatthegenusspeciesandpopulationlevelsimpactsinsituecologicalanalysesofdinoflagellatesandharmfulalgalblooms
AT baruaabanti genomiccopynumbervariabilityatthegenusspeciesandpopulationlevelsimpactsinsituecologicalanalysesofdinoflagellatesandharmfulalgalblooms
AT bolchchristopherjs genomiccopynumbervariabilityatthegenusspeciesandpopulationlevelsimpactsinsituecologicalanalysesofdinoflagellatesandharmfulalgalblooms
AT sarowarchowdhury genomiccopynumbervariabilityatthegenusspeciesandpopulationlevelsimpactsinsituecologicalanalysesofdinoflagellatesandharmfulalgalblooms
AT savelahenna genomiccopynumbervariabilityatthegenusspeciesandpopulationlevelsimpactsinsituecologicalanalysesofdinoflagellatesandharmfulalgalblooms
AT murrayshaunaa genomiccopynumbervariabilityatthegenusspeciesandpopulationlevelsimpactsinsituecologicalanalysesofdinoflagellatesandharmfulalgalblooms