Cargando…

A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction

Aim The study compared the anesthetic effectiveness of articaine and lignocaine when premolars are extracted bilaterally for orthodontic purposes. Material and methods This prospective split-mouth study was performed on 30 cases selected from orthodontic referral patients reporting to the Oral and M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaiswal, Pooja, Goyal, Rohit, Dubey, Chanda, Akhter, Javed, Ramalingam, Karthikeyan, Kalita, Sangita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431340
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40167
_version_ 1785070091212161024
author Jaiswal, Pooja
Goyal, Rohit
Dubey, Chanda
Akhter, Javed
Ramalingam, Karthikeyan
Kalita, Sangita
author_facet Jaiswal, Pooja
Goyal, Rohit
Dubey, Chanda
Akhter, Javed
Ramalingam, Karthikeyan
Kalita, Sangita
author_sort Jaiswal, Pooja
collection PubMed
description Aim The study compared the anesthetic effectiveness of articaine and lignocaine when premolars are extracted bilaterally for orthodontic purposes. Material and methods This prospective split-mouth study was performed on 30 cases selected from orthodontic referral patients reporting to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department at Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College and Research Center, Rajasthan, India, for bilateral extraction of premolars under local anesthesia. We used 4% articaine hydrochloride and adrenaline 1:100000 (AH) as group A and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline 1:100000 (LH) on the control side as group B. For premolar anesthetization, 0.6-1.6 ml of AH and 1-2 ml of LH were injected submucosally in the buccal vestibular area. The extraction procedure was then carried out after achieving adequate anesthesia. The pain was assessed with Visual Analog Scale. The average onset time and duration of anesthesia were recorded. Data collected were summarized with descriptive statistics. The SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York) was used for data entry, validation, and analysis. Means of continuous variables were compared using the student t-test. All tests were 2-tailed and significant at equal or less than 0.05. (p≤0.05). Results When comparing the overall anesthetic efficiency, Group A had a lower overall pain score of 0.43 while Group B had a higher overall pain score of 2.9. The average onset time of anesthesia in Group A was 1.2 minutes and 2.55 minutes in Group B. In Group A, the average duration of anesthesia was 70 minutes, and 46.5 minutes in Group B. These parameters were statistically significant with a p-value of <0.05. Conclusion The study concluded that as an alternative to lignocaine, articaine could be used effectively for maxillary premolar extractions for orthodontic reasons obviating palatal injection which is very painful to the patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10329780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103297802023-07-10 A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction Jaiswal, Pooja Goyal, Rohit Dubey, Chanda Akhter, Javed Ramalingam, Karthikeyan Kalita, Sangita Cureus Anesthesiology Aim The study compared the anesthetic effectiveness of articaine and lignocaine when premolars are extracted bilaterally for orthodontic purposes. Material and methods This prospective split-mouth study was performed on 30 cases selected from orthodontic referral patients reporting to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department at Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College and Research Center, Rajasthan, India, for bilateral extraction of premolars under local anesthesia. We used 4% articaine hydrochloride and adrenaline 1:100000 (AH) as group A and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline 1:100000 (LH) on the control side as group B. For premolar anesthetization, 0.6-1.6 ml of AH and 1-2 ml of LH were injected submucosally in the buccal vestibular area. The extraction procedure was then carried out after achieving adequate anesthesia. The pain was assessed with Visual Analog Scale. The average onset time and duration of anesthesia were recorded. Data collected were summarized with descriptive statistics. The SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York) was used for data entry, validation, and analysis. Means of continuous variables were compared using the student t-test. All tests were 2-tailed and significant at equal or less than 0.05. (p≤0.05). Results When comparing the overall anesthetic efficiency, Group A had a lower overall pain score of 0.43 while Group B had a higher overall pain score of 2.9. The average onset time of anesthesia in Group A was 1.2 minutes and 2.55 minutes in Group B. In Group A, the average duration of anesthesia was 70 minutes, and 46.5 minutes in Group B. These parameters were statistically significant with a p-value of <0.05. Conclusion The study concluded that as an alternative to lignocaine, articaine could be used effectively for maxillary premolar extractions for orthodontic reasons obviating palatal injection which is very painful to the patient. Cureus 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10329780/ /pubmed/37431340 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40167 Text en Copyright © 2023, Jaiswal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Jaiswal, Pooja
Goyal, Rohit
Dubey, Chanda
Akhter, Javed
Ramalingam, Karthikeyan
Kalita, Sangita
A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction
title A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction
title_full A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction
title_fullStr A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction
title_full_unstemmed A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction
title_short A Split-Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lignocaine for Maxillary Bicuspids Extraction
title_sort split-mouth clinical comparative evaluation of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lignocaine for maxillary bicuspids extraction
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431340
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40167
work_keys_str_mv AT jaiswalpooja asplitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT goyalrohit asplitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT dubeychanda asplitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT akhterjaved asplitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT ramalingamkarthikeyan asplitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT kalitasangita asplitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT jaiswalpooja splitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT goyalrohit splitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT dubeychanda splitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT akhterjaved splitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT ramalingamkarthikeyan splitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction
AT kalitasangita splitmouthclinicalcomparativeevaluationoftheanestheticefficacyofarticaineandlignocaineformaxillarybicuspidsextraction