Cargando…
Patient and public involvement in health research in Norway: a survey among researchers and patient organisations
BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research may improve both the relevance and quality of the research. There is however a lack of research investigating the experiences, attitudes and barriers towards PPI in clinical research in Norway. The Norwegian Clinical Research Infras...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37422661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00458-x |
_version_ | 1785070091960844288 |
---|---|
author | Aas, Sigve Nyvik Distefano, Marita Borg Pettersen, Ingvild Gravrok, Berit Nordvoll, Laila Yvonne Bjaastad, Jon Fauskanger Grimsgaard, Sameline |
author_facet | Aas, Sigve Nyvik Distefano, Marita Borg Pettersen, Ingvild Gravrok, Berit Nordvoll, Laila Yvonne Bjaastad, Jon Fauskanger Grimsgaard, Sameline |
author_sort | Aas, Sigve Nyvik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research may improve both the relevance and quality of the research. There is however a lack of research investigating the experiences, attitudes and barriers towards PPI in clinical research in Norway. The Norwegian Clinical Research Infrastructure Network therefore conducted a survey among researchers and PPI contributors aiming to investigate experiences with PPI and identify current challenges for successful involvement. METHODS: Two survey questionnaires were developed and distributed in October and November 2021. The survey targeting 1185 researchers was distributed from the research administrative system in the Regional Health Trusts. The survey targeting PPI contributors was distributed through Norwegian patient organisations, regional and national competence centers. RESULTS: The response rate was 30% among researchers and was unobtainable from PPI contributors due to the survey distribution strategy. PPI was most frequently used in the planning and conduct of the studies, and less utilized in dissemination and implementation of results. Both researchers and user representatives were generally positive to PPI, and agreed that PPI might be more useful in clinical research than in underpinning research. Researchers and PPI contributors who reported that roles and expectations were clarified in advance, were more likely to experience a common understanding of roles and responsibilities in the research project. Both groups pointed to the importance of earmarked funding for PPI activities. There was a demand for a closer collaboration between researchers and patient organisations to develop accessible tools and effective models for PPI in health research. CONCLUSIONS: Surveys among clinical researchers and PPI contributors indicate overall positive attitudes towards PPI in clinical research. However, more resources, such as budget, time, and accessible tools, are needed. Clarifying roles and expectations, and creating new PPI models under resource constraints can enhance its effectiveness. PPI is underutilized in disseminating and implementing research results, presenting an opportunity for improving healthcare outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-023-00458-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10329785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103297852023-07-10 Patient and public involvement in health research in Norway: a survey among researchers and patient organisations Aas, Sigve Nyvik Distefano, Marita Borg Pettersen, Ingvild Gravrok, Berit Nordvoll, Laila Yvonne Bjaastad, Jon Fauskanger Grimsgaard, Sameline Res Involv Engagem Research BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research may improve both the relevance and quality of the research. There is however a lack of research investigating the experiences, attitudes and barriers towards PPI in clinical research in Norway. The Norwegian Clinical Research Infrastructure Network therefore conducted a survey among researchers and PPI contributors aiming to investigate experiences with PPI and identify current challenges for successful involvement. METHODS: Two survey questionnaires were developed and distributed in October and November 2021. The survey targeting 1185 researchers was distributed from the research administrative system in the Regional Health Trusts. The survey targeting PPI contributors was distributed through Norwegian patient organisations, regional and national competence centers. RESULTS: The response rate was 30% among researchers and was unobtainable from PPI contributors due to the survey distribution strategy. PPI was most frequently used in the planning and conduct of the studies, and less utilized in dissemination and implementation of results. Both researchers and user representatives were generally positive to PPI, and agreed that PPI might be more useful in clinical research than in underpinning research. Researchers and PPI contributors who reported that roles and expectations were clarified in advance, were more likely to experience a common understanding of roles and responsibilities in the research project. Both groups pointed to the importance of earmarked funding for PPI activities. There was a demand for a closer collaboration between researchers and patient organisations to develop accessible tools and effective models for PPI in health research. CONCLUSIONS: Surveys among clinical researchers and PPI contributors indicate overall positive attitudes towards PPI in clinical research. However, more resources, such as budget, time, and accessible tools, are needed. Clarifying roles and expectations, and creating new PPI models under resource constraints can enhance its effectiveness. PPI is underutilized in disseminating and implementing research results, presenting an opportunity for improving healthcare outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-023-00458-x. BioMed Central 2023-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10329785/ /pubmed/37422661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00458-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Aas, Sigve Nyvik Distefano, Marita Borg Pettersen, Ingvild Gravrok, Berit Nordvoll, Laila Yvonne Bjaastad, Jon Fauskanger Grimsgaard, Sameline Patient and public involvement in health research in Norway: a survey among researchers and patient organisations |
title | Patient and public involvement in health research in Norway: a survey among researchers and patient organisations |
title_full | Patient and public involvement in health research in Norway: a survey among researchers and patient organisations |
title_fullStr | Patient and public involvement in health research in Norway: a survey among researchers and patient organisations |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient and public involvement in health research in Norway: a survey among researchers and patient organisations |
title_short | Patient and public involvement in health research in Norway: a survey among researchers and patient organisations |
title_sort | patient and public involvement in health research in norway: a survey among researchers and patient organisations |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37422661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00458-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aassigvenyvik patientandpublicinvolvementinhealthresearchinnorwayasurveyamongresearchersandpatientorganisations AT distefanomaritaborg patientandpublicinvolvementinhealthresearchinnorwayasurveyamongresearchersandpatientorganisations AT petterseningvild patientandpublicinvolvementinhealthresearchinnorwayasurveyamongresearchersandpatientorganisations AT gravrokberit patientandpublicinvolvementinhealthresearchinnorwayasurveyamongresearchersandpatientorganisations AT nordvolllailayvonne patientandpublicinvolvementinhealthresearchinnorwayasurveyamongresearchersandpatientorganisations AT bjaastadjonfauskanger patientandpublicinvolvementinhealthresearchinnorwayasurveyamongresearchersandpatientorganisations AT grimsgaardsameline patientandpublicinvolvementinhealthresearchinnorwayasurveyamongresearchersandpatientorganisations |