Cargando…
Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation
BACKGROUND: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing is an emerging screening modality for noninvasive detection of acute rejection (AR). This study compared the testing accuracy for AR of two commercially available dd-cfDNA and gene-expression profiling (GEP) testing in heart transplant (HTx)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37036133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14984 |
_version_ | 1785070136376426496 |
---|---|
author | Rodgers, Nicholas Gerding, Bryn Cusi, Vincenzo Vaida, Florin Tada, Yuko Morris, Gerald P. Adler, Eric D. Stehlik, Josef Kim, Paul J. |
author_facet | Rodgers, Nicholas Gerding, Bryn Cusi, Vincenzo Vaida, Florin Tada, Yuko Morris, Gerald P. Adler, Eric D. Stehlik, Josef Kim, Paul J. |
author_sort | Rodgers, Nicholas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing is an emerging screening modality for noninvasive detection of acute rejection (AR). This study compared the testing accuracy for AR of two commercially available dd-cfDNA and gene-expression profiling (GEP) testing in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of HTx only patients who underwent standard and expanded single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) dd-cfDNA between October 2020 to January 2022. Comparison with GEP was also performed. Assays were compared for correlation, accurate classification, and prediction for AR. RESULTS: A total of 428 samples from 112 unique HTx patients were used for the study. A positive standard SNP correlated with the expanded SNP assay (p < .001). Both standard and expanded SNP tests showed low sensitivity (39%, p = 1.0) but high specificity (82% and 84%, p = 1.0) for AR. GEP did not improve sensitivity and showed worse specificity (p < .001) compared to standard dd-cfDNA. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference between standard and expanded SNP assays in detecting AR. We show improved specificity without change in sensitivity using dd-cfDNA in place of GEP testing. Prospective controlled studies to address how to best implement dd-cfDNA testing into clinical practice are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10330254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103302542023-07-10 Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation Rodgers, Nicholas Gerding, Bryn Cusi, Vincenzo Vaida, Florin Tada, Yuko Morris, Gerald P. Adler, Eric D. Stehlik, Josef Kim, Paul J. Clin Transplant Article BACKGROUND: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing is an emerging screening modality for noninvasive detection of acute rejection (AR). This study compared the testing accuracy for AR of two commercially available dd-cfDNA and gene-expression profiling (GEP) testing in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of HTx only patients who underwent standard and expanded single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) dd-cfDNA between October 2020 to January 2022. Comparison with GEP was also performed. Assays were compared for correlation, accurate classification, and prediction for AR. RESULTS: A total of 428 samples from 112 unique HTx patients were used for the study. A positive standard SNP correlated with the expanded SNP assay (p < .001). Both standard and expanded SNP tests showed low sensitivity (39%, p = 1.0) but high specificity (82% and 84%, p = 1.0) for AR. GEP did not improve sensitivity and showed worse specificity (p < .001) compared to standard dd-cfDNA. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference between standard and expanded SNP assays in detecting AR. We show improved specificity without change in sensitivity using dd-cfDNA in place of GEP testing. Prospective controlled studies to address how to best implement dd-cfDNA testing into clinical practice are needed. 2023-06 2023-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10330254/ /pubmed/37036133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14984 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Article Rodgers, Nicholas Gerding, Bryn Cusi, Vincenzo Vaida, Florin Tada, Yuko Morris, Gerald P. Adler, Eric D. Stehlik, Josef Kim, Paul J. Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation |
title | Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation |
title_full | Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation |
title_short | Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation |
title_sort | comparison of two donor-derived cell-free dna tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37036133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14984 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodgersnicholas comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation AT gerdingbryn comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation AT cusivincenzo comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation AT vaidaflorin comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation AT tadayuko comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation AT morrisgeraldp comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation AT adlerericd comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation AT stehlikjosef comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation AT kimpaulj comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation |