Cargando…

Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation

BACKGROUND: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing is an emerging screening modality for noninvasive detection of acute rejection (AR). This study compared the testing accuracy for AR of two commercially available dd-cfDNA and gene-expression profiling (GEP) testing in heart transplant (HTx)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodgers, Nicholas, Gerding, Bryn, Cusi, Vincenzo, Vaida, Florin, Tada, Yuko, Morris, Gerald P., Adler, Eric D., Stehlik, Josef, Kim, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37036133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14984
_version_ 1785070136376426496
author Rodgers, Nicholas
Gerding, Bryn
Cusi, Vincenzo
Vaida, Florin
Tada, Yuko
Morris, Gerald P.
Adler, Eric D.
Stehlik, Josef
Kim, Paul J.
author_facet Rodgers, Nicholas
Gerding, Bryn
Cusi, Vincenzo
Vaida, Florin
Tada, Yuko
Morris, Gerald P.
Adler, Eric D.
Stehlik, Josef
Kim, Paul J.
author_sort Rodgers, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing is an emerging screening modality for noninvasive detection of acute rejection (AR). This study compared the testing accuracy for AR of two commercially available dd-cfDNA and gene-expression profiling (GEP) testing in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of HTx only patients who underwent standard and expanded single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) dd-cfDNA between October 2020 to January 2022. Comparison with GEP was also performed. Assays were compared for correlation, accurate classification, and prediction for AR. RESULTS: A total of 428 samples from 112 unique HTx patients were used for the study. A positive standard SNP correlated with the expanded SNP assay (p < .001). Both standard and expanded SNP tests showed low sensitivity (39%, p = 1.0) but high specificity (82% and 84%, p = 1.0) for AR. GEP did not improve sensitivity and showed worse specificity (p < .001) compared to standard dd-cfDNA. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference between standard and expanded SNP assays in detecting AR. We show improved specificity without change in sensitivity using dd-cfDNA in place of GEP testing. Prospective controlled studies to address how to best implement dd-cfDNA testing into clinical practice are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10330254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103302542023-07-10 Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation Rodgers, Nicholas Gerding, Bryn Cusi, Vincenzo Vaida, Florin Tada, Yuko Morris, Gerald P. Adler, Eric D. Stehlik, Josef Kim, Paul J. Clin Transplant Article BACKGROUND: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing is an emerging screening modality for noninvasive detection of acute rejection (AR). This study compared the testing accuracy for AR of two commercially available dd-cfDNA and gene-expression profiling (GEP) testing in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of HTx only patients who underwent standard and expanded single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) dd-cfDNA between October 2020 to January 2022. Comparison with GEP was also performed. Assays were compared for correlation, accurate classification, and prediction for AR. RESULTS: A total of 428 samples from 112 unique HTx patients were used for the study. A positive standard SNP correlated with the expanded SNP assay (p < .001). Both standard and expanded SNP tests showed low sensitivity (39%, p = 1.0) but high specificity (82% and 84%, p = 1.0) for AR. GEP did not improve sensitivity and showed worse specificity (p < .001) compared to standard dd-cfDNA. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference between standard and expanded SNP assays in detecting AR. We show improved specificity without change in sensitivity using dd-cfDNA in place of GEP testing. Prospective controlled studies to address how to best implement dd-cfDNA testing into clinical practice are needed. 2023-06 2023-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10330254/ /pubmed/37036133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14984 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Article
Rodgers, Nicholas
Gerding, Bryn
Cusi, Vincenzo
Vaida, Florin
Tada, Yuko
Morris, Gerald P.
Adler, Eric D.
Stehlik, Josef
Kim, Paul J.
Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation
title Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation
title_full Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation
title_fullStr Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation
title_short Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation
title_sort comparison of two donor-derived cell-free dna tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37036133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14984
work_keys_str_mv AT rodgersnicholas comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation
AT gerdingbryn comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation
AT cusivincenzo comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation
AT vaidaflorin comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation
AT tadayuko comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation
AT morrisgeraldp comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation
AT adlerericd comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation
AT stehlikjosef comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation
AT kimpaulj comparisonoftwodonorderivedcellfreednatestsandabloodgeneexpressionprofiletestinhearttransplantation