Cargando…

Towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: High current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials

BACKGROUND: While single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is increasingly used to study effective connectivity, the effects of varying stimulation parameters on the resulting cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) have not been systematically explored. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hays, Mark A., Kamali, Golnoosh, Koubeissi, Mohamad Z., Sarma, Sridevi V., Crone, Nathan E., Smith, Rachel J., Kang, Joon Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37141936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.023
_version_ 1785070152964898816
author Hays, Mark A.
Kamali, Golnoosh
Koubeissi, Mohamad Z.
Sarma, Sridevi V.
Crone, Nathan E.
Smith, Rachel J.
Kang, Joon Y.
author_facet Hays, Mark A.
Kamali, Golnoosh
Koubeissi, Mohamad Z.
Sarma, Sridevi V.
Crone, Nathan E.
Smith, Rachel J.
Kang, Joon Y.
author_sort Hays, Mark A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is increasingly used to study effective connectivity, the effects of varying stimulation parameters on the resulting cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) have not been systematically explored. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand the interacting effects of stimulation pulse width, current intensity, and charge on CCEPs through an extensive testing of this parameter space and analysis of several response metrics. METHODS: We conducted SPES in 11 patients undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring using five combinations of current intensity (1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, and 7.5 mA) and pulse width at each of three charges (0.750, 1.125, and 1.500 μC/phase) to study how CCEP amplitude, distribution, latency, morphology, and stimulus artifact amplitude vary with each parameter. RESULTS: Stimulations with a greater charge or a greater current intensity and shorter pulse width at a given charge generally resulted in greater CCEP amplitudes and spatial distributions, shorter latencies, and increased waveform correlation. These effects interacted such that stimulations with the lowest charge and highest current intensities resulted in greater response amplitudes and spatial distributions than stimulations with the highest charge and lowest current intensities. Stimulus artifact amplitude increased with charge, but this could be mitigated by using shorter pulse widths. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that individual combinations of current intensity and pulse width, in addition to charge, are important determinants of CCEP magnitude, morphology, and spatial extent. Together, these findings suggest that high current intensity, short pulse width stimulations are optimal SPES settings for eliciting strong and consistent responses while minimizing charge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10330807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103308072023-07-10 Towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: High current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials Hays, Mark A. Kamali, Golnoosh Koubeissi, Mohamad Z. Sarma, Sridevi V. Crone, Nathan E. Smith, Rachel J. Kang, Joon Y. Brain Stimul Article BACKGROUND: While single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is increasingly used to study effective connectivity, the effects of varying stimulation parameters on the resulting cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) have not been systematically explored. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand the interacting effects of stimulation pulse width, current intensity, and charge on CCEPs through an extensive testing of this parameter space and analysis of several response metrics. METHODS: We conducted SPES in 11 patients undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring using five combinations of current intensity (1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, and 7.5 mA) and pulse width at each of three charges (0.750, 1.125, and 1.500 μC/phase) to study how CCEP amplitude, distribution, latency, morphology, and stimulus artifact amplitude vary with each parameter. RESULTS: Stimulations with a greater charge or a greater current intensity and shorter pulse width at a given charge generally resulted in greater CCEP amplitudes and spatial distributions, shorter latencies, and increased waveform correlation. These effects interacted such that stimulations with the lowest charge and highest current intensities resulted in greater response amplitudes and spatial distributions than stimulations with the highest charge and lowest current intensities. Stimulus artifact amplitude increased with charge, but this could be mitigated by using shorter pulse widths. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that individual combinations of current intensity and pulse width, in addition to charge, are important determinants of CCEP magnitude, morphology, and spatial extent. Together, these findings suggest that high current intensity, short pulse width stimulations are optimal SPES settings for eliciting strong and consistent responses while minimizing charge. 2023 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10330807/ /pubmed/37141936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.023 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Hays, Mark A.
Kamali, Golnoosh
Koubeissi, Mohamad Z.
Sarma, Sridevi V.
Crone, Nathan E.
Smith, Rachel J.
Kang, Joon Y.
Towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: High current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials
title Towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: High current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials
title_full Towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: High current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials
title_fullStr Towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: High current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials
title_full_unstemmed Towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: High current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials
title_short Towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: High current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials
title_sort towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: high current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37141936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.023
work_keys_str_mv AT haysmarka towardsoptimizingsinglepulseelectricalstimulationhighcurrentintensityshortpulsewidthstimulationmosteffectivelyelicitsevokedpotentials
AT kamaligolnoosh towardsoptimizingsinglepulseelectricalstimulationhighcurrentintensityshortpulsewidthstimulationmosteffectivelyelicitsevokedpotentials
AT koubeissimohamadz towardsoptimizingsinglepulseelectricalstimulationhighcurrentintensityshortpulsewidthstimulationmosteffectivelyelicitsevokedpotentials
AT sarmasrideviv towardsoptimizingsinglepulseelectricalstimulationhighcurrentintensityshortpulsewidthstimulationmosteffectivelyelicitsevokedpotentials
AT cronenathane towardsoptimizingsinglepulseelectricalstimulationhighcurrentintensityshortpulsewidthstimulationmosteffectivelyelicitsevokedpotentials
AT smithrachelj towardsoptimizingsinglepulseelectricalstimulationhighcurrentintensityshortpulsewidthstimulationmosteffectivelyelicitsevokedpotentials
AT kangjoony towardsoptimizingsinglepulseelectricalstimulationhighcurrentintensityshortpulsewidthstimulationmosteffectivelyelicitsevokedpotentials