Cargando…
Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases
Background: Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs have improved neonatal healthcare since the 1960s. Genomic sequencing now offers potential to generate polygenic risk score (PRS) that could be incorporated into NBS programs, shifting the focus from treatment to prevention of future noncommunic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762 |
_version_ | 1785070154879598592 |
---|---|
author | Casauria, Sarah Lewis, Sharon Lynch, Fiona Saffery, Richard |
author_facet | Casauria, Sarah Lewis, Sharon Lynch, Fiona Saffery, Richard |
author_sort | Casauria, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs have improved neonatal healthcare since the 1960s. Genomic sequencing now offers potential to generate polygenic risk score (PRS) that could be incorporated into NBS programs, shifting the focus from treatment to prevention of future noncommunicable disease (NCD). However, Australian parents’ knowledge and attitudes regarding PRS for NBS is currently unknown. Methods: Parents with at least one Australian-born child under 18 years were invited via social media platforms to complete an online questionnaire aimed at examining parents’ knowledge of NCDs, PRS, and precision medicine, their opinions on receiving PRS for their child, and considerations of early-intervention strategies to prevent the onset of disease. Results: Of 126 participants, 90.5% had heard the term “non-communicable disease or chronic condition,” but only 31.8% and 34.4% were aware of the terms “polygenic risk score” and “precision medicine” respectively. A large proportion of participants said they would consider screening their newborn to receive a PRS for allergies (77.9%), asthma (81.0%), cancer (64.8%), cardiovascular disease (65.7%), mental illness (56.7%), obesity (49.5%), and type 2 diabetes (66.7%). Additionally, participants would primarily consider diet and exercise as interventions for specific NCDs. Discussion: The results from this study will inform future policy for genomic NBS, including expected rate of uptake and interventions that parents would consider employing to prevent the onset of disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10330815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103308152023-07-11 Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases Casauria, Sarah Lewis, Sharon Lynch, Fiona Saffery, Richard Front Genet Genetics Background: Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs have improved neonatal healthcare since the 1960s. Genomic sequencing now offers potential to generate polygenic risk score (PRS) that could be incorporated into NBS programs, shifting the focus from treatment to prevention of future noncommunicable disease (NCD). However, Australian parents’ knowledge and attitudes regarding PRS for NBS is currently unknown. Methods: Parents with at least one Australian-born child under 18 years were invited via social media platforms to complete an online questionnaire aimed at examining parents’ knowledge of NCDs, PRS, and precision medicine, their opinions on receiving PRS for their child, and considerations of early-intervention strategies to prevent the onset of disease. Results: Of 126 participants, 90.5% had heard the term “non-communicable disease or chronic condition,” but only 31.8% and 34.4% were aware of the terms “polygenic risk score” and “precision medicine” respectively. A large proportion of participants said they would consider screening their newborn to receive a PRS for allergies (77.9%), asthma (81.0%), cancer (64.8%), cardiovascular disease (65.7%), mental illness (56.7%), obesity (49.5%), and type 2 diabetes (66.7%). Additionally, participants would primarily consider diet and exercise as interventions for specific NCDs. Discussion: The results from this study will inform future policy for genomic NBS, including expected rate of uptake and interventions that parents would consider employing to prevent the onset of disease. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10330815/ /pubmed/37434950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762 Text en Copyright © 2023 Casauria, Lewis, Lynch and Saffery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Casauria, Sarah Lewis, Sharon Lynch, Fiona Saffery, Richard Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title | Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title_full | Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title_fullStr | Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title_short | Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
title_sort | australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT casauriasarah australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases AT lewissharon australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases AT lynchfiona australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases AT safferyrichard australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases |