Cargando…

Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases

Background: Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs have improved neonatal healthcare since the 1960s. Genomic sequencing now offers potential to generate polygenic risk score (PRS) that could be incorporated into NBS programs, shifting the focus from treatment to prevention of future noncommunic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casauria, Sarah, Lewis, Sharon, Lynch, Fiona, Saffery, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762
_version_ 1785070154879598592
author Casauria, Sarah
Lewis, Sharon
Lynch, Fiona
Saffery, Richard
author_facet Casauria, Sarah
Lewis, Sharon
Lynch, Fiona
Saffery, Richard
author_sort Casauria, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Background: Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs have improved neonatal healthcare since the 1960s. Genomic sequencing now offers potential to generate polygenic risk score (PRS) that could be incorporated into NBS programs, shifting the focus from treatment to prevention of future noncommunicable disease (NCD). However, Australian parents’ knowledge and attitudes regarding PRS for NBS is currently unknown. Methods: Parents with at least one Australian-born child under 18 years were invited via social media platforms to complete an online questionnaire aimed at examining parents’ knowledge of NCDs, PRS, and precision medicine, their opinions on receiving PRS for their child, and considerations of early-intervention strategies to prevent the onset of disease. Results: Of 126 participants, 90.5% had heard the term “non-communicable disease or chronic condition,” but only 31.8% and 34.4% were aware of the terms “polygenic risk score” and “precision medicine” respectively. A large proportion of participants said they would consider screening their newborn to receive a PRS for allergies (77.9%), asthma (81.0%), cancer (64.8%), cardiovascular disease (65.7%), mental illness (56.7%), obesity (49.5%), and type 2 diabetes (66.7%). Additionally, participants would primarily consider diet and exercise as interventions for specific NCDs. Discussion: The results from this study will inform future policy for genomic NBS, including expected rate of uptake and interventions that parents would consider employing to prevent the onset of disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10330815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103308152023-07-11 Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases Casauria, Sarah Lewis, Sharon Lynch, Fiona Saffery, Richard Front Genet Genetics Background: Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs have improved neonatal healthcare since the 1960s. Genomic sequencing now offers potential to generate polygenic risk score (PRS) that could be incorporated into NBS programs, shifting the focus from treatment to prevention of future noncommunicable disease (NCD). However, Australian parents’ knowledge and attitudes regarding PRS for NBS is currently unknown. Methods: Parents with at least one Australian-born child under 18 years were invited via social media platforms to complete an online questionnaire aimed at examining parents’ knowledge of NCDs, PRS, and precision medicine, their opinions on receiving PRS for their child, and considerations of early-intervention strategies to prevent the onset of disease. Results: Of 126 participants, 90.5% had heard the term “non-communicable disease or chronic condition,” but only 31.8% and 34.4% were aware of the terms “polygenic risk score” and “precision medicine” respectively. A large proportion of participants said they would consider screening their newborn to receive a PRS for allergies (77.9%), asthma (81.0%), cancer (64.8%), cardiovascular disease (65.7%), mental illness (56.7%), obesity (49.5%), and type 2 diabetes (66.7%). Additionally, participants would primarily consider diet and exercise as interventions for specific NCDs. Discussion: The results from this study will inform future policy for genomic NBS, including expected rate of uptake and interventions that parents would consider employing to prevent the onset of disease. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10330815/ /pubmed/37434950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762 Text en Copyright © 2023 Casauria, Lewis, Lynch and Saffery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Casauria, Sarah
Lewis, Sharon
Lynch, Fiona
Saffery, Richard
Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases
title Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases
title_full Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases
title_fullStr Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases
title_full_unstemmed Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases
title_short Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases
title_sort australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762
work_keys_str_mv AT casauriasarah australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases
AT lewissharon australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases
AT lynchfiona australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases
AT safferyrichard australianparentalperceptionsofgenomicnewbornscreeningfornoncommunicablediseases