Cargando…

Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt?

PURPOSE: To review our single-center surgical outcomes of redo operations after failed Rex shunt procedures. METHODS: From September 2017 to October 2021, a total of 20 patients (11 males, 9 females; median age: 8.6 years) with Rex shunt occlusions were admitted to our hospital. Two of these patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Zhe, Wang, Jieqin, Yang, Chao, Liu, Tao, Liang, Qifeng, Liang, Jiankun, Ning, Yu, You, Fuyu, Bai, Xiaoling, Hong, Miao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1135059
_version_ 1785070172872114176
author Wen, Zhe
Wang, Jieqin
Yang, Chao
Liu, Tao
Liang, Qifeng
Liang, Jiankun
Ning, Yu
You, Fuyu
Bai, Xiaoling
Hong, Miao
author_facet Wen, Zhe
Wang, Jieqin
Yang, Chao
Liu, Tao
Liang, Qifeng
Liang, Jiankun
Ning, Yu
You, Fuyu
Bai, Xiaoling
Hong, Miao
author_sort Wen, Zhe
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To review our single-center surgical outcomes of redo operations after failed Rex shunt procedures. METHODS: From September 2017 to October 2021, a total of 20 patients (11 males, 9 females; median age: 8.6 years) with Rex shunt occlusions were admitted to our hospital. Two of these patients were previously operated on in our hospital, and the remaining 18 were from other centers. All patients underwent repeat operations after detailed preoperative evaluations. RESULTS: Preoperative wedged hepatic vein portography (WHVP) was conducted for 18 patients. Thirteen patients exhibited well-developed Rex recessus and intrahepatic portal vein during WHPV examination, consistent with the intraoperative exploration results. Fifteen patients (75%, 15/20) underwent redo-Rex shunt, four underwent Warren shunt and one underwent devascularization surgery. During the redo-Rex shunt operations, the left internal jugular veins (IJV) were used as bypass grafts in 11 patients; the intra-abdominal veins were used in 4 patients. The patients were followed up for 12–59 months (mean, 24.8 months). After redo Rex shunts, the grafts were patent in 14 patients (93.3%, 14/15), but 1 graft had thrombosis (6.7%, 1/15). Three patients suffered from postoperative anastomotic stenosis, and all of the stenosis was relieved with balloon dilatations. After re-Rex shunts, esophageal varices and spleen size were substantially reduced, and the platelet count significantly increased. Postoperative graft thrombosis was found in 1 patient after Warren shunt (1/4, 25%), and there was no graft stenosis. Compared with Warren surgery, patients who underwent re-Rex shunt had a significantly higher rate of platelet increase. CONCLUSIONS: Redo-rex shunts can be finished in most patients with failed Rex shunts. Re-Rex shunt is a preferred surgical choice after a failed Rex shunt when a good bypass graft is available, and the surgical success rate can reach more than 90%. A suitable bypass graft is essential for a successful redo Rex shunt. Preoperative WHVP is recommended for the design of a redo surgical plan preoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10331016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103310162023-07-11 Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt? Wen, Zhe Wang, Jieqin Yang, Chao Liu, Tao Liang, Qifeng Liang, Jiankun Ning, Yu You, Fuyu Bai, Xiaoling Hong, Miao Front Pediatr Pediatrics PURPOSE: To review our single-center surgical outcomes of redo operations after failed Rex shunt procedures. METHODS: From September 2017 to October 2021, a total of 20 patients (11 males, 9 females; median age: 8.6 years) with Rex shunt occlusions were admitted to our hospital. Two of these patients were previously operated on in our hospital, and the remaining 18 were from other centers. All patients underwent repeat operations after detailed preoperative evaluations. RESULTS: Preoperative wedged hepatic vein portography (WHVP) was conducted for 18 patients. Thirteen patients exhibited well-developed Rex recessus and intrahepatic portal vein during WHPV examination, consistent with the intraoperative exploration results. Fifteen patients (75%, 15/20) underwent redo-Rex shunt, four underwent Warren shunt and one underwent devascularization surgery. During the redo-Rex shunt operations, the left internal jugular veins (IJV) were used as bypass grafts in 11 patients; the intra-abdominal veins were used in 4 patients. The patients were followed up for 12–59 months (mean, 24.8 months). After redo Rex shunts, the grafts were patent in 14 patients (93.3%, 14/15), but 1 graft had thrombosis (6.7%, 1/15). Three patients suffered from postoperative anastomotic stenosis, and all of the stenosis was relieved with balloon dilatations. After re-Rex shunts, esophageal varices and spleen size were substantially reduced, and the platelet count significantly increased. Postoperative graft thrombosis was found in 1 patient after Warren shunt (1/4, 25%), and there was no graft stenosis. Compared with Warren surgery, patients who underwent re-Rex shunt had a significantly higher rate of platelet increase. CONCLUSIONS: Redo-rex shunts can be finished in most patients with failed Rex shunts. Re-Rex shunt is a preferred surgical choice after a failed Rex shunt when a good bypass graft is available, and the surgical success rate can reach more than 90%. A suitable bypass graft is essential for a successful redo Rex shunt. Preoperative WHVP is recommended for the design of a redo surgical plan preoperatively. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10331016/ /pubmed/37435166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1135059 Text en © 2023 Wen, Wang, Yang, Liu, Liang, Liang, Ning, You, Bai and Hong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Wen, Zhe
Wang, Jieqin
Yang, Chao
Liu, Tao
Liang, Qifeng
Liang, Jiankun
Ning, Yu
You, Fuyu
Bai, Xiaoling
Hong, Miao
Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt?
title Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt?
title_full Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt?
title_fullStr Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt?
title_full_unstemmed Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt?
title_short Is re-Rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed Rex shunt?
title_sort is re-rex shunt a better choice for patients with failed rex shunt?
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1135059
work_keys_str_mv AT wenzhe isrerexshuntabetterchoiceforpatientswithfailedrexshunt
AT wangjieqin isrerexshuntabetterchoiceforpatientswithfailedrexshunt
AT yangchao isrerexshuntabetterchoiceforpatientswithfailedrexshunt
AT liutao isrerexshuntabetterchoiceforpatientswithfailedrexshunt
AT liangqifeng isrerexshuntabetterchoiceforpatientswithfailedrexshunt
AT liangjiankun isrerexshuntabetterchoiceforpatientswithfailedrexshunt
AT ningyu isrerexshuntabetterchoiceforpatientswithfailedrexshunt
AT youfuyu isrerexshuntabetterchoiceforpatientswithfailedrexshunt
AT baixiaoling isrerexshuntabetterchoiceforpatientswithfailedrexshunt
AT hongmiao isrerexshuntabetterchoiceforpatientswithfailedrexshunt