Cargando…

Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study

BACKGROUND: Patients on dialysis are commonly prescribed multiple medications (polypharmacy), many of which are potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Potentially inappropriate medications are associated with an increased risk of falls, fractures, and hospitalization. MedSafer is an electroni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bortolussi-Courval, Émilie, Podymow, Tiina, Trinh, Emilie, Moryousef, Joseph, Hanula, R., Huon, Jean-François, Mavrakanas, Thomas, Suri, Rita, Lee, Todd C., McDonald, Emily Gibson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20543581231165712
_version_ 1785070192615751680
author Bortolussi-Courval, Émilie
Podymow, Tiina
Trinh, Emilie
Moryousef, Joseph
Hanula, R.
Huon, Jean-François
Mavrakanas, Thomas
Suri, Rita
Lee, Todd C.
McDonald, Emily Gibson
author_facet Bortolussi-Courval, Émilie
Podymow, Tiina
Trinh, Emilie
Moryousef, Joseph
Hanula, R.
Huon, Jean-François
Mavrakanas, Thomas
Suri, Rita
Lee, Todd C.
McDonald, Emily Gibson
author_sort Bortolussi-Courval, Émilie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients on dialysis are commonly prescribed multiple medications (polypharmacy), many of which are potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Potentially inappropriate medications are associated with an increased risk of falls, fractures, and hospitalization. MedSafer is an electronic tool that generates individualized, prioritized reports with deprescribing opportunities by cross-referencing patient health data and medications with guidelines for deprescribing. OBJECTIVES: Our primary aim was to increase deprescribing, as compared with usual care (medication reconciliation or MedRec), for outpatients receiving maintenance hemodialysis, through the provision of MedSafer deprescribing opportunity reports to the treating team and patient empowerment deprescribing brochures provided directly to the patients themselves. DESIGN: This controlled, prospective, quality improvement study with a contemporary control builds on existing policy at the outpatient hemodialysis centers where biannual MedRecs are performed by the treating nephrologist and nursing team. SETTING: The study takes place on 2 of the 3 outpatient hemodialysis units of the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The intervention unit is the Lachine Hospital, and the control unit is the Montreal General Hospital. PATIENTS: A closed cohort of outpatient hemodialysis patients visit one of the hemodialysis centers multiple times per week for their hemodialysis treatment. The initial cohort of the intervention unit includes 85 patients, whereas the control unit has 153 patients. Patients who are transplanted, hospitalized during their scheduled MedRec, or die before or during the MedRec will be excluded from the study. MEASUREMENTS: We will compare rates of deprescribing between the control and intervention units following a single MedRec. On the intervention unit, MedRecs will be paired with MedSafer reports (the intervention), and on the control unit, MedRecs will take place without MedSafer reports (usual care). On the intervention unit, patients will also receive deprescribing patient empowerment brochures for select medication classes (gabapentinoids, proton-pump inhibitors, sedative hypnotics and opioids for chronic non-cancer pain). Physicians on the intervention unit will be interviewed post-MedRec to determine implementation barriers and facilitators. METHODS: The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with 1 or more PIMs deprescribed on the intervention unit, as compared with the control unit, following a biannual MedRec. This study will build on existing policies aimed at optimizing medication therapy in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. The electronic deprescribing decision support tool, MedSafer, will be tested in a dialysis setting, where nephrologists are regularly in contact with patients. MedRecs are an interdisciplinary clinical activity performed biannually on the hemodialysis units (in the Spring and Fall), and within 1 week following discharge from any hospitalization. This study will take place in the Fall of 2022. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted among physicians on the intervention unit to determine barriers and facilitators to implementation of the MedSafer-supplemented MedRec process and analyzed according to grounded theory in qualitative research. LIMITATIONS: Deprescribing can be limited due to nephrologists’ time constraints, cognitive impairment of the hemodialyzed patient stemming from their illness and complex medication regimens, and lack of sufficient patient resources to learn about the medications they are taking and their potential harms. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic decision support can facilitate deprescribing for the clinical team by providing a nudge reminder, decreasing the time it takes to review and effectuate guideline recommendations, and by lowering the barrier of when and how to taper. Guidelines for deprescribing in the dialysis population have recently been published and incorporated into the MedSafer software. To our knowledge, this will be the first study to examine the efficacy of pairing these guidelines with MedRecs by leveraging electronic decision support in the outpatient dialysis population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05585268) on October 2, 2022, prior to the enrolment of the first participant on October 3, 2022. The registration number is pending at the time of protocol submission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10331104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103311042023-07-11 Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study Bortolussi-Courval, Émilie Podymow, Tiina Trinh, Emilie Moryousef, Joseph Hanula, R. Huon, Jean-François Mavrakanas, Thomas Suri, Rita Lee, Todd C. McDonald, Emily Gibson Can J Kidney Health Dis Clinical Research Protocol BACKGROUND: Patients on dialysis are commonly prescribed multiple medications (polypharmacy), many of which are potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Potentially inappropriate medications are associated with an increased risk of falls, fractures, and hospitalization. MedSafer is an electronic tool that generates individualized, prioritized reports with deprescribing opportunities by cross-referencing patient health data and medications with guidelines for deprescribing. OBJECTIVES: Our primary aim was to increase deprescribing, as compared with usual care (medication reconciliation or MedRec), for outpatients receiving maintenance hemodialysis, through the provision of MedSafer deprescribing opportunity reports to the treating team and patient empowerment deprescribing brochures provided directly to the patients themselves. DESIGN: This controlled, prospective, quality improvement study with a contemporary control builds on existing policy at the outpatient hemodialysis centers where biannual MedRecs are performed by the treating nephrologist and nursing team. SETTING: The study takes place on 2 of the 3 outpatient hemodialysis units of the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The intervention unit is the Lachine Hospital, and the control unit is the Montreal General Hospital. PATIENTS: A closed cohort of outpatient hemodialysis patients visit one of the hemodialysis centers multiple times per week for their hemodialysis treatment. The initial cohort of the intervention unit includes 85 patients, whereas the control unit has 153 patients. Patients who are transplanted, hospitalized during their scheduled MedRec, or die before or during the MedRec will be excluded from the study. MEASUREMENTS: We will compare rates of deprescribing between the control and intervention units following a single MedRec. On the intervention unit, MedRecs will be paired with MedSafer reports (the intervention), and on the control unit, MedRecs will take place without MedSafer reports (usual care). On the intervention unit, patients will also receive deprescribing patient empowerment brochures for select medication classes (gabapentinoids, proton-pump inhibitors, sedative hypnotics and opioids for chronic non-cancer pain). Physicians on the intervention unit will be interviewed post-MedRec to determine implementation barriers and facilitators. METHODS: The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with 1 or more PIMs deprescribed on the intervention unit, as compared with the control unit, following a biannual MedRec. This study will build on existing policies aimed at optimizing medication therapy in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. The electronic deprescribing decision support tool, MedSafer, will be tested in a dialysis setting, where nephrologists are regularly in contact with patients. MedRecs are an interdisciplinary clinical activity performed biannually on the hemodialysis units (in the Spring and Fall), and within 1 week following discharge from any hospitalization. This study will take place in the Fall of 2022. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted among physicians on the intervention unit to determine barriers and facilitators to implementation of the MedSafer-supplemented MedRec process and analyzed according to grounded theory in qualitative research. LIMITATIONS: Deprescribing can be limited due to nephrologists’ time constraints, cognitive impairment of the hemodialyzed patient stemming from their illness and complex medication regimens, and lack of sufficient patient resources to learn about the medications they are taking and their potential harms. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic decision support can facilitate deprescribing for the clinical team by providing a nudge reminder, decreasing the time it takes to review and effectuate guideline recommendations, and by lowering the barrier of when and how to taper. Guidelines for deprescribing in the dialysis population have recently been published and incorporated into the MedSafer software. To our knowledge, this will be the first study to examine the efficacy of pairing these guidelines with MedRecs by leveraging electronic decision support in the outpatient dialysis population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05585268) on October 2, 2022, prior to the enrolment of the first participant on October 3, 2022. The registration number is pending at the time of protocol submission. SAGE Publications 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10331104/ /pubmed/37435299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20543581231165712 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Research Protocol
Bortolussi-Courval, Émilie
Podymow, Tiina
Trinh, Emilie
Moryousef, Joseph
Hanula, R.
Huon, Jean-François
Mavrakanas, Thomas
Suri, Rita
Lee, Todd C.
McDonald, Emily Gibson
Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study
title Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study
title_full Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study
title_fullStr Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study
title_short Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study
title_sort electronic decision support for deprescribing in patients on hemodialysis: clinical research protocol for a prospective, controlled, quality improvement study
topic Clinical Research Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20543581231165712
work_keys_str_mv AT bortolussicourvalemilie electronicdecisionsupportfordeprescribinginpatientsonhemodialysisclinicalresearchprotocolforaprospectivecontrolledqualityimprovementstudy
AT podymowtiina electronicdecisionsupportfordeprescribinginpatientsonhemodialysisclinicalresearchprotocolforaprospectivecontrolledqualityimprovementstudy
AT trinhemilie electronicdecisionsupportfordeprescribinginpatientsonhemodialysisclinicalresearchprotocolforaprospectivecontrolledqualityimprovementstudy
AT moryousefjoseph electronicdecisionsupportfordeprescribinginpatientsonhemodialysisclinicalresearchprotocolforaprospectivecontrolledqualityimprovementstudy
AT hanular electronicdecisionsupportfordeprescribinginpatientsonhemodialysisclinicalresearchprotocolforaprospectivecontrolledqualityimprovementstudy
AT huonjeanfrancois electronicdecisionsupportfordeprescribinginpatientsonhemodialysisclinicalresearchprotocolforaprospectivecontrolledqualityimprovementstudy
AT mavrakanasthomas electronicdecisionsupportfordeprescribinginpatientsonhemodialysisclinicalresearchprotocolforaprospectivecontrolledqualityimprovementstudy
AT suririta electronicdecisionsupportfordeprescribinginpatientsonhemodialysisclinicalresearchprotocolforaprospectivecontrolledqualityimprovementstudy
AT leetoddc electronicdecisionsupportfordeprescribinginpatientsonhemodialysisclinicalresearchprotocolforaprospectivecontrolledqualityimprovementstudy
AT mcdonaldemilygibson electronicdecisionsupportfordeprescribinginpatientsonhemodialysisclinicalresearchprotocolforaprospectivecontrolledqualityimprovementstudy