Cargando…
AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies
Current ethical debates on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare treat AI as a product of technology in three ways. First, by assessing risks and potential benefits of currently developed AI-enabled products with ethical checklists; second, by proposing ex ante lists of ethical value...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1039839 |
_version_ | 1785070248946302976 |
---|---|
author | Schicktanz, Silke Welsch, Johannes Schweda, Mark Hein, Andreas Rieger, Jochem W. Kirste, Thomas |
author_facet | Schicktanz, Silke Welsch, Johannes Schweda, Mark Hein, Andreas Rieger, Jochem W. Kirste, Thomas |
author_sort | Schicktanz, Silke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current ethical debates on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare treat AI as a product of technology in three ways. First, by assessing risks and potential benefits of currently developed AI-enabled products with ethical checklists; second, by proposing ex ante lists of ethical values seen as relevant for the design and development of assistive technology, and third, by promoting AI technology to use moral reasoning as part of the automation process. The dominance of these three perspectives in the discourse is demonstrated by a brief summary of the literature. Subsequently, we propose a fourth approach to AI, namely, as a methodological tool to assist ethical reflection. We provide a concept of an AI-simulation informed by three separate elements: 1) stochastic human behavior models based on behavioral data for simulating realistic settings, 2) qualitative empirical data on value statements regarding internal policy, and 3) visualization components that aid in understanding the impact of changes in these variables. The potential of this approach is to inform an interdisciplinary field about anticipated ethical challenges or ethical trade-offs in concrete settings and, hence, to spark a re-evaluation of design and implementation plans. This may be particularly useful for applications that deal with extremely complex values and behavior or with limitations on the communication resources of affected persons (e.g., persons with dementia care or for care of persons with cognitive impairment). Simulation does not replace ethical reflection but does allow for detailed, context-sensitive analysis during the design process and prior to implementation. Finally, we discuss the inherently quantitative methods of analysis afforded by stochastic simulations as well as the potential for ethical discussions and how simulations with AI can improve traditional forms of thought experiments and future-oriented technology assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10331421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103314212023-07-11 AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies Schicktanz, Silke Welsch, Johannes Schweda, Mark Hein, Andreas Rieger, Jochem W. Kirste, Thomas Front Genet Genetics Current ethical debates on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare treat AI as a product of technology in three ways. First, by assessing risks and potential benefits of currently developed AI-enabled products with ethical checklists; second, by proposing ex ante lists of ethical values seen as relevant for the design and development of assistive technology, and third, by promoting AI technology to use moral reasoning as part of the automation process. The dominance of these three perspectives in the discourse is demonstrated by a brief summary of the literature. Subsequently, we propose a fourth approach to AI, namely, as a methodological tool to assist ethical reflection. We provide a concept of an AI-simulation informed by three separate elements: 1) stochastic human behavior models based on behavioral data for simulating realistic settings, 2) qualitative empirical data on value statements regarding internal policy, and 3) visualization components that aid in understanding the impact of changes in these variables. The potential of this approach is to inform an interdisciplinary field about anticipated ethical challenges or ethical trade-offs in concrete settings and, hence, to spark a re-evaluation of design and implementation plans. This may be particularly useful for applications that deal with extremely complex values and behavior or with limitations on the communication resources of affected persons (e.g., persons with dementia care or for care of persons with cognitive impairment). Simulation does not replace ethical reflection but does allow for detailed, context-sensitive analysis during the design process and prior to implementation. Finally, we discuss the inherently quantitative methods of analysis afforded by stochastic simulations as well as the potential for ethical discussions and how simulations with AI can improve traditional forms of thought experiments and future-oriented technology assessment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10331421/ /pubmed/37434952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1039839 Text en Copyright © 2023 Schicktanz, Welsch, Schweda, Hein, Rieger and Kirste. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Schicktanz, Silke Welsch, Johannes Schweda, Mark Hein, Andreas Rieger, Jochem W. Kirste, Thomas AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies |
title | AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies |
title_full | AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies |
title_fullStr | AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies |
title_short | AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies |
title_sort | ai-assisted ethics? considerations of ai simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1039839 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schicktanzsilke aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies AT welschjohannes aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies AT schwedamark aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies AT heinandreas aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies AT riegerjochemw aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies AT kirstethomas aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies |