Cargando…

AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies

Current ethical debates on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare treat AI as a product of technology in three ways. First, by assessing risks and potential benefits of currently developed AI-enabled products with ethical checklists; second, by proposing ex ante lists of ethical value...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schicktanz, Silke, Welsch, Johannes, Schweda, Mark, Hein, Andreas, Rieger, Jochem W., Kirste, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1039839
_version_ 1785070248946302976
author Schicktanz, Silke
Welsch, Johannes
Schweda, Mark
Hein, Andreas
Rieger, Jochem W.
Kirste, Thomas
author_facet Schicktanz, Silke
Welsch, Johannes
Schweda, Mark
Hein, Andreas
Rieger, Jochem W.
Kirste, Thomas
author_sort Schicktanz, Silke
collection PubMed
description Current ethical debates on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare treat AI as a product of technology in three ways. First, by assessing risks and potential benefits of currently developed AI-enabled products with ethical checklists; second, by proposing ex ante lists of ethical values seen as relevant for the design and development of assistive technology, and third, by promoting AI technology to use moral reasoning as part of the automation process. The dominance of these three perspectives in the discourse is demonstrated by a brief summary of the literature. Subsequently, we propose a fourth approach to AI, namely, as a methodological tool to assist ethical reflection. We provide a concept of an AI-simulation informed by three separate elements: 1) stochastic human behavior models based on behavioral data for simulating realistic settings, 2) qualitative empirical data on value statements regarding internal policy, and 3) visualization components that aid in understanding the impact of changes in these variables. The potential of this approach is to inform an interdisciplinary field about anticipated ethical challenges or ethical trade-offs in concrete settings and, hence, to spark a re-evaluation of design and implementation plans. This may be particularly useful for applications that deal with extremely complex values and behavior or with limitations on the communication resources of affected persons (e.g., persons with dementia care or for care of persons with cognitive impairment). Simulation does not replace ethical reflection but does allow for detailed, context-sensitive analysis during the design process and prior to implementation. Finally, we discuss the inherently quantitative methods of analysis afforded by stochastic simulations as well as the potential for ethical discussions and how simulations with AI can improve traditional forms of thought experiments and future-oriented technology assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10331421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103314212023-07-11 AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies Schicktanz, Silke Welsch, Johannes Schweda, Mark Hein, Andreas Rieger, Jochem W. Kirste, Thomas Front Genet Genetics Current ethical debates on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare treat AI as a product of technology in three ways. First, by assessing risks and potential benefits of currently developed AI-enabled products with ethical checklists; second, by proposing ex ante lists of ethical values seen as relevant for the design and development of assistive technology, and third, by promoting AI technology to use moral reasoning as part of the automation process. The dominance of these three perspectives in the discourse is demonstrated by a brief summary of the literature. Subsequently, we propose a fourth approach to AI, namely, as a methodological tool to assist ethical reflection. We provide a concept of an AI-simulation informed by three separate elements: 1) stochastic human behavior models based on behavioral data for simulating realistic settings, 2) qualitative empirical data on value statements regarding internal policy, and 3) visualization components that aid in understanding the impact of changes in these variables. The potential of this approach is to inform an interdisciplinary field about anticipated ethical challenges or ethical trade-offs in concrete settings and, hence, to spark a re-evaluation of design and implementation plans. This may be particularly useful for applications that deal with extremely complex values and behavior or with limitations on the communication resources of affected persons (e.g., persons with dementia care or for care of persons with cognitive impairment). Simulation does not replace ethical reflection but does allow for detailed, context-sensitive analysis during the design process and prior to implementation. Finally, we discuss the inherently quantitative methods of analysis afforded by stochastic simulations as well as the potential for ethical discussions and how simulations with AI can improve traditional forms of thought experiments and future-oriented technology assessment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10331421/ /pubmed/37434952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1039839 Text en Copyright © 2023 Schicktanz, Welsch, Schweda, Hein, Rieger and Kirste. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Schicktanz, Silke
Welsch, Johannes
Schweda, Mark
Hein, Andreas
Rieger, Jochem W.
Kirste, Thomas
AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies
title AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies
title_full AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies
title_fullStr AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies
title_full_unstemmed AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies
title_short AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies
title_sort ai-assisted ethics? considerations of ai simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434952
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1039839
work_keys_str_mv AT schicktanzsilke aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies
AT welschjohannes aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies
AT schwedamark aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies
AT heinandreas aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies
AT riegerjochemw aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies
AT kirstethomas aiassistedethicsconsiderationsofaisimulationfortheethicalassessmentanddesignofassistivetechnologies