Cargando…

Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect

BACKGROUND: Wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) in comparison to ostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) has been attributed with improved rhythm outcome. We investigated the feasibility, lesion formation, and rhythm outcome of WACA-PVI in comparison to ostial-PVI using pulsed field ablat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tilz, Roland R., Heeger, Christian H., Vogler, Julia, Eitel, Charlotte, Feher, Marcel, Phan, Huong-Lan, Mushfiq, Ilias, Popescu, Sorin S., Zetzsch, Leonie, Traub, Anna, Hatahet, Sascha, Mortensen, Kai, Kuck, Karl-Heinz, Kirstein, Bettina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435050
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217745
_version_ 1785070250626121728
author Tilz, Roland R.
Heeger, Christian H.
Vogler, Julia
Eitel, Charlotte
Feher, Marcel
Phan, Huong-Lan
Mushfiq, Ilias
Popescu, Sorin S.
Zetzsch, Leonie
Traub, Anna
Hatahet, Sascha
Mortensen, Kai
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Kirstein, Bettina
author_facet Tilz, Roland R.
Heeger, Christian H.
Vogler, Julia
Eitel, Charlotte
Feher, Marcel
Phan, Huong-Lan
Mushfiq, Ilias
Popescu, Sorin S.
Zetzsch, Leonie
Traub, Anna
Hatahet, Sascha
Mortensen, Kai
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Kirstein, Bettina
author_sort Tilz, Roland R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) in comparison to ostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) has been attributed with improved rhythm outcome. We investigated the feasibility, lesion formation, and rhythm outcome of WACA-PVI in comparison to ostial-PVI using pulsed field ablation (PFA). METHODS: Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (69 years, 67% male; 67% paroxysmal AF) were prospectively enrolled into our single-center registry and underwent first-time ostial-PFA or WACA-PFA, N = 15 each. In all patients, eight pulse trains (2 kV/2.5 s, bipolar, biphasic, 4× basket/flower configuration each) were delivered to each PV. In WACA-PFA, two extra pulse trains in a flower configuration were added to the anterior and posterior antrum of the PVs. For comparison of PFA lesion size, pre- and post-ablation left atrial (LA) voltage maps were acquired using a multipolar spiral catheter together with a three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. RESULTS: WACA-PFA resulted in a significant larger lesion formation than ostial-PFA (45.5 vs. 35.1 cm(2), p = 0.001) with bilateral overlapping butterfly shape-like lesions and concomitant posterior LA wall isolation in 73% of patients. This was not associated with increased procedure time, sedation dosage, or exposure to radiation. One-year freedom from AF recurrence was numerically higher after WACA-PFA than ostial-PFA (94% vs. 87%) but not statistically significant (p = 0.68). No organized atrial tachycardias (ATs) were observed. Ostial-PFA patients more often underwent re-ablation due to recurrent AF episodes. CONCLUSION: WACA-PFA is feasible and resulted in significantly wider lesion sets than ostial-PFA. Concomitant posterior LA wall isolation occurred as an epiphenomenon in the majority of patients. The WACA approach was associated with neither increased procedure and fluoroscopy times nor statistically significant differences in 1-year rhythm outcome. ATs were absent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10331428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103314282023-07-11 Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect Tilz, Roland R. Heeger, Christian H. Vogler, Julia Eitel, Charlotte Feher, Marcel Phan, Huong-Lan Mushfiq, Ilias Popescu, Sorin S. Zetzsch, Leonie Traub, Anna Hatahet, Sascha Mortensen, Kai Kuck, Karl-Heinz Kirstein, Bettina Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) in comparison to ostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) has been attributed with improved rhythm outcome. We investigated the feasibility, lesion formation, and rhythm outcome of WACA-PVI in comparison to ostial-PVI using pulsed field ablation (PFA). METHODS: Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (69 years, 67% male; 67% paroxysmal AF) were prospectively enrolled into our single-center registry and underwent first-time ostial-PFA or WACA-PFA, N = 15 each. In all patients, eight pulse trains (2 kV/2.5 s, bipolar, biphasic, 4× basket/flower configuration each) were delivered to each PV. In WACA-PFA, two extra pulse trains in a flower configuration were added to the anterior and posterior antrum of the PVs. For comparison of PFA lesion size, pre- and post-ablation left atrial (LA) voltage maps were acquired using a multipolar spiral catheter together with a three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. RESULTS: WACA-PFA resulted in a significant larger lesion formation than ostial-PFA (45.5 vs. 35.1 cm(2), p = 0.001) with bilateral overlapping butterfly shape-like lesions and concomitant posterior LA wall isolation in 73% of patients. This was not associated with increased procedure time, sedation dosage, or exposure to radiation. One-year freedom from AF recurrence was numerically higher after WACA-PFA than ostial-PFA (94% vs. 87%) but not statistically significant (p = 0.68). No organized atrial tachycardias (ATs) were observed. Ostial-PFA patients more often underwent re-ablation due to recurrent AF episodes. CONCLUSION: WACA-PFA is feasible and resulted in significantly wider lesion sets than ostial-PFA. Concomitant posterior LA wall isolation occurred as an epiphenomenon in the majority of patients. The WACA approach was associated with neither increased procedure and fluoroscopy times nor statistically significant differences in 1-year rhythm outcome. ATs were absent. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10331428/ /pubmed/37435050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217745 Text en © 2023 Tilz, Heeger, Vogler, Eitel, Feher, Phan, Mushfiq, Popescu, Zetzsch, Traub, Hatahet, Mortensen, Kuck and Kirstein. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Tilz, Roland R.
Heeger, Christian H.
Vogler, Julia
Eitel, Charlotte
Feher, Marcel
Phan, Huong-Lan
Mushfiq, Ilias
Popescu, Sorin S.
Zetzsch, Leonie
Traub, Anna
Hatahet, Sascha
Mortensen, Kai
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Kirstein, Bettina
Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect
title Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect
title_full Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect
title_fullStr Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect
title_full_unstemmed Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect
title_short Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect
title_sort wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435050
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217745
work_keys_str_mv AT tilzrolandr wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT heegerchristianh wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT voglerjulia wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT eitelcharlotte wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT fehermarcel wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT phanhuonglan wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT mushfiqilias wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT popescusorins wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT zetzschleonie wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT traubanna wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT hatahetsascha wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT mortensenkai wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT kuckkarlheinz wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect
AT kirsteinbettina wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect