Cargando…
Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect
BACKGROUND: Wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) in comparison to ostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) has been attributed with improved rhythm outcome. We investigated the feasibility, lesion formation, and rhythm outcome of WACA-PVI in comparison to ostial-PVI using pulsed field ablat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217745 |
_version_ | 1785070250626121728 |
---|---|
author | Tilz, Roland R. Heeger, Christian H. Vogler, Julia Eitel, Charlotte Feher, Marcel Phan, Huong-Lan Mushfiq, Ilias Popescu, Sorin S. Zetzsch, Leonie Traub, Anna Hatahet, Sascha Mortensen, Kai Kuck, Karl-Heinz Kirstein, Bettina |
author_facet | Tilz, Roland R. Heeger, Christian H. Vogler, Julia Eitel, Charlotte Feher, Marcel Phan, Huong-Lan Mushfiq, Ilias Popescu, Sorin S. Zetzsch, Leonie Traub, Anna Hatahet, Sascha Mortensen, Kai Kuck, Karl-Heinz Kirstein, Bettina |
author_sort | Tilz, Roland R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) in comparison to ostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) has been attributed with improved rhythm outcome. We investigated the feasibility, lesion formation, and rhythm outcome of WACA-PVI in comparison to ostial-PVI using pulsed field ablation (PFA). METHODS: Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (69 years, 67% male; 67% paroxysmal AF) were prospectively enrolled into our single-center registry and underwent first-time ostial-PFA or WACA-PFA, N = 15 each. In all patients, eight pulse trains (2 kV/2.5 s, bipolar, biphasic, 4× basket/flower configuration each) were delivered to each PV. In WACA-PFA, two extra pulse trains in a flower configuration were added to the anterior and posterior antrum of the PVs. For comparison of PFA lesion size, pre- and post-ablation left atrial (LA) voltage maps were acquired using a multipolar spiral catheter together with a three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. RESULTS: WACA-PFA resulted in a significant larger lesion formation than ostial-PFA (45.5 vs. 35.1 cm(2), p = 0.001) with bilateral overlapping butterfly shape-like lesions and concomitant posterior LA wall isolation in 73% of patients. This was not associated with increased procedure time, sedation dosage, or exposure to radiation. One-year freedom from AF recurrence was numerically higher after WACA-PFA than ostial-PFA (94% vs. 87%) but not statistically significant (p = 0.68). No organized atrial tachycardias (ATs) were observed. Ostial-PFA patients more often underwent re-ablation due to recurrent AF episodes. CONCLUSION: WACA-PFA is feasible and resulted in significantly wider lesion sets than ostial-PFA. Concomitant posterior LA wall isolation occurred as an epiphenomenon in the majority of patients. The WACA approach was associated with neither increased procedure and fluoroscopy times nor statistically significant differences in 1-year rhythm outcome. ATs were absent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10331428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103314282023-07-11 Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect Tilz, Roland R. Heeger, Christian H. Vogler, Julia Eitel, Charlotte Feher, Marcel Phan, Huong-Lan Mushfiq, Ilias Popescu, Sorin S. Zetzsch, Leonie Traub, Anna Hatahet, Sascha Mortensen, Kai Kuck, Karl-Heinz Kirstein, Bettina Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) in comparison to ostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) has been attributed with improved rhythm outcome. We investigated the feasibility, lesion formation, and rhythm outcome of WACA-PVI in comparison to ostial-PVI using pulsed field ablation (PFA). METHODS: Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (69 years, 67% male; 67% paroxysmal AF) were prospectively enrolled into our single-center registry and underwent first-time ostial-PFA or WACA-PFA, N = 15 each. In all patients, eight pulse trains (2 kV/2.5 s, bipolar, biphasic, 4× basket/flower configuration each) were delivered to each PV. In WACA-PFA, two extra pulse trains in a flower configuration were added to the anterior and posterior antrum of the PVs. For comparison of PFA lesion size, pre- and post-ablation left atrial (LA) voltage maps were acquired using a multipolar spiral catheter together with a three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. RESULTS: WACA-PFA resulted in a significant larger lesion formation than ostial-PFA (45.5 vs. 35.1 cm(2), p = 0.001) with bilateral overlapping butterfly shape-like lesions and concomitant posterior LA wall isolation in 73% of patients. This was not associated with increased procedure time, sedation dosage, or exposure to radiation. One-year freedom from AF recurrence was numerically higher after WACA-PFA than ostial-PFA (94% vs. 87%) but not statistically significant (p = 0.68). No organized atrial tachycardias (ATs) were observed. Ostial-PFA patients more often underwent re-ablation due to recurrent AF episodes. CONCLUSION: WACA-PFA is feasible and resulted in significantly wider lesion sets than ostial-PFA. Concomitant posterior LA wall isolation occurred as an epiphenomenon in the majority of patients. The WACA approach was associated with neither increased procedure and fluoroscopy times nor statistically significant differences in 1-year rhythm outcome. ATs were absent. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10331428/ /pubmed/37435050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217745 Text en © 2023 Tilz, Heeger, Vogler, Eitel, Feher, Phan, Mushfiq, Popescu, Zetzsch, Traub, Hatahet, Mortensen, Kuck and Kirstein. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Tilz, Roland R. Heeger, Christian H. Vogler, Julia Eitel, Charlotte Feher, Marcel Phan, Huong-Lan Mushfiq, Ilias Popescu, Sorin S. Zetzsch, Leonie Traub, Anna Hatahet, Sascha Mortensen, Kai Kuck, Karl-Heinz Kirstein, Bettina Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect |
title | Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect |
title_full | Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect |
title_fullStr | Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect |
title_full_unstemmed | Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect |
title_short | Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect |
title_sort | wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tilzrolandr wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT heegerchristianh wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT voglerjulia wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT eitelcharlotte wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT fehermarcel wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT phanhuonglan wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT mushfiqilias wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT popescusorins wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT zetzschleonie wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT traubanna wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT hatahetsascha wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT mortensenkai wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT kuckkarlheinz wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect AT kirsteinbettina wideantralcircumferentialvsostialpulmonaryveinisolationusingpulsedfieldablationthebutterflyeffect |