Cargando…

Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common parasitic disorder that is endemic in many countries. There is no completely effective treatment for this condition, but pentavalent antimony compounds are regarded as the main treatment. Different laser types have been used for treatment of CL wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siadat, Amirhossein, Galehdari, Hamid, Shahmoradi, Zabiholah, Iraji, Fariba, Zolfaghari, Azadeh, Ansari, Nazli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434930
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_410_21
_version_ 1785070274251587584
author Siadat, Amirhossein
Galehdari, Hamid
Shahmoradi, Zabiholah
Iraji, Fariba
Zolfaghari, Azadeh
Ansari, Nazli
author_facet Siadat, Amirhossein
Galehdari, Hamid
Shahmoradi, Zabiholah
Iraji, Fariba
Zolfaghari, Azadeh
Ansari, Nazli
author_sort Siadat, Amirhossein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common parasitic disorder that is endemic in many countries. There is no completely effective treatment for this condition, but pentavalent antimony compounds are regarded as the main treatment. Different laser types have been used for treatment of CL with variable success but to our best knowledge, there is no published paper regarding use of intense pulsed light (IPL) for treatment of CL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial study, we compared the efficacy of intralesional glucantime alone versus intralesional glucantime plus weekly IPL for treatment of 54 patients with confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis for a maximum of eight weeks as a randomized, clinical trial. RESULTS: Although it was not statistically significant, combination treatment was more effective than intralesional glucantime alone (P > 0.05). However, the velocity of healing was significantly higher in the IPL plus intralesional glucantime alone versus glucantime alone. No side effect was observed in both groups. DISCUSSION: To better evaluate the efficacy of IPL, more studies with a higher number of patients and using various IPL filters are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10331534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103315342023-07-11 Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective? Siadat, Amirhossein Galehdari, Hamid Shahmoradi, Zabiholah Iraji, Fariba Zolfaghari, Azadeh Ansari, Nazli Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common parasitic disorder that is endemic in many countries. There is no completely effective treatment for this condition, but pentavalent antimony compounds are regarded as the main treatment. Different laser types have been used for treatment of CL with variable success but to our best knowledge, there is no published paper regarding use of intense pulsed light (IPL) for treatment of CL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial study, we compared the efficacy of intralesional glucantime alone versus intralesional glucantime plus weekly IPL for treatment of 54 patients with confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis for a maximum of eight weeks as a randomized, clinical trial. RESULTS: Although it was not statistically significant, combination treatment was more effective than intralesional glucantime alone (P > 0.05). However, the velocity of healing was significantly higher in the IPL plus intralesional glucantime alone versus glucantime alone. No side effect was observed in both groups. DISCUSSION: To better evaluate the efficacy of IPL, more studies with a higher number of patients and using various IPL filters are recommended. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10331534/ /pubmed/37434930 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_410_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Advanced Biomedical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Siadat, Amirhossein
Galehdari, Hamid
Shahmoradi, Zabiholah
Iraji, Fariba
Zolfaghari, Azadeh
Ansari, Nazli
Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?
title Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?
title_full Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?
title_fullStr Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?
title_short Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?
title_sort treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with intense pulsed light: is it effective?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434930
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_410_21
work_keys_str_mv AT siadatamirhossein treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective
AT galehdarihamid treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective
AT shahmoradizabiholah treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective
AT irajifariba treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective
AT zolfaghariazadeh treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective
AT ansarinazli treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective