Cargando…
Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common parasitic disorder that is endemic in many countries. There is no completely effective treatment for this condition, but pentavalent antimony compounds are regarded as the main treatment. Different laser types have been used for treatment of CL wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434930 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_410_21 |
_version_ | 1785070274251587584 |
---|---|
author | Siadat, Amirhossein Galehdari, Hamid Shahmoradi, Zabiholah Iraji, Fariba Zolfaghari, Azadeh Ansari, Nazli |
author_facet | Siadat, Amirhossein Galehdari, Hamid Shahmoradi, Zabiholah Iraji, Fariba Zolfaghari, Azadeh Ansari, Nazli |
author_sort | Siadat, Amirhossein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common parasitic disorder that is endemic in many countries. There is no completely effective treatment for this condition, but pentavalent antimony compounds are regarded as the main treatment. Different laser types have been used for treatment of CL with variable success but to our best knowledge, there is no published paper regarding use of intense pulsed light (IPL) for treatment of CL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial study, we compared the efficacy of intralesional glucantime alone versus intralesional glucantime plus weekly IPL for treatment of 54 patients with confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis for a maximum of eight weeks as a randomized, clinical trial. RESULTS: Although it was not statistically significant, combination treatment was more effective than intralesional glucantime alone (P > 0.05). However, the velocity of healing was significantly higher in the IPL plus intralesional glucantime alone versus glucantime alone. No side effect was observed in both groups. DISCUSSION: To better evaluate the efficacy of IPL, more studies with a higher number of patients and using various IPL filters are recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10331534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103315342023-07-11 Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective? Siadat, Amirhossein Galehdari, Hamid Shahmoradi, Zabiholah Iraji, Fariba Zolfaghari, Azadeh Ansari, Nazli Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common parasitic disorder that is endemic in many countries. There is no completely effective treatment for this condition, but pentavalent antimony compounds are regarded as the main treatment. Different laser types have been used for treatment of CL with variable success but to our best knowledge, there is no published paper regarding use of intense pulsed light (IPL) for treatment of CL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial study, we compared the efficacy of intralesional glucantime alone versus intralesional glucantime plus weekly IPL for treatment of 54 patients with confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis for a maximum of eight weeks as a randomized, clinical trial. RESULTS: Although it was not statistically significant, combination treatment was more effective than intralesional glucantime alone (P > 0.05). However, the velocity of healing was significantly higher in the IPL plus intralesional glucantime alone versus glucantime alone. No side effect was observed in both groups. DISCUSSION: To better evaluate the efficacy of IPL, more studies with a higher number of patients and using various IPL filters are recommended. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10331534/ /pubmed/37434930 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_410_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Advanced Biomedical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Siadat, Amirhossein Galehdari, Hamid Shahmoradi, Zabiholah Iraji, Fariba Zolfaghari, Azadeh Ansari, Nazli Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective? |
title | Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective? |
title_full | Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective? |
title_fullStr | Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective? |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective? |
title_short | Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective? |
title_sort | treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with intense pulsed light: is it effective? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434930 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_410_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siadatamirhossein treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective AT galehdarihamid treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective AT shahmoradizabiholah treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective AT irajifariba treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective AT zolfaghariazadeh treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective AT ansarinazli treatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasiswithintensepulsedlightisiteffective |