Cargando…

Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement—baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort

Vertebral artery (VA) involvement in giant cell arteritis (GCA) has rarely been reported. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, patients’ characteristics, and immunotherapies used in patients with GCA and VA involvement at diagnosis and 1 year follow-up, retrospectively including patients being diagn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prünte, Mona Klara Ros, Naumann, Anne, Christ, Monika, Naumann, Markus, Bayas, Antonios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435161
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1188073
_version_ 1785070289780998144
author Prünte, Mona Klara Ros
Naumann, Anne
Christ, Monika
Naumann, Markus
Bayas, Antonios
author_facet Prünte, Mona Klara Ros
Naumann, Anne
Christ, Monika
Naumann, Markus
Bayas, Antonios
author_sort Prünte, Mona Klara Ros
collection PubMed
description Vertebral artery (VA) involvement in giant cell arteritis (GCA) has rarely been reported. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, patients’ characteristics, and immunotherapies used in patients with GCA and VA involvement at diagnosis and 1 year follow-up, retrospectively including patients being diagnosed between January 2011 and March 2021 in our department. Clinical features, laboratory data, VA imaging, immunotherapy, and 1 year follow-up data were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were compared to GCA patients without VA involvement. Among all 77 cases with GCA, 29 patients (37.7%) had VA involvement, as diagnosed by imaging and/or clinical signs and symptoms. Gender distribution and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly different in the groups with and without VA involvement, with more women being affected (38/48 patients, 79.2%) and a significantly higher median ESR in patients without VA involvement (62 vs. 46 mm/h; p = 0.012). MRI and/or CT showed vertebrobasilar stroke at GCA diagnosis in 11 cases. 67/77 patients (87.0%) received high-dose intravenous glucocorticosteroids (GCs) at diagnosis, followed by oral tapering. Six patients were treated with methotrexate (MTX), one with rituximab, and five with tocilizumab (TCZ). 2/5 TCZ patients achieved clinical remission after 1 year, vertebrobasilar stroke within the first year occurred in 2/5 patients. Diagnosis of VA involvement might be underrecognized in GCA patients. VA imaging should be performed in elderly patients with vertebrobasilar stroke presenting with GCA symptoms, not to miss GCA as the etiology of stroke. Efficacy of immunotherapies in GCA with VA affection and long-term outcomes need to be investigated further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10331602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103316022023-07-11 Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement—baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort Prünte, Mona Klara Ros Naumann, Anne Christ, Monika Naumann, Markus Bayas, Antonios Front Neurol Neurology Vertebral artery (VA) involvement in giant cell arteritis (GCA) has rarely been reported. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, patients’ characteristics, and immunotherapies used in patients with GCA and VA involvement at diagnosis and 1 year follow-up, retrospectively including patients being diagnosed between January 2011 and March 2021 in our department. Clinical features, laboratory data, VA imaging, immunotherapy, and 1 year follow-up data were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were compared to GCA patients without VA involvement. Among all 77 cases with GCA, 29 patients (37.7%) had VA involvement, as diagnosed by imaging and/or clinical signs and symptoms. Gender distribution and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly different in the groups with and without VA involvement, with more women being affected (38/48 patients, 79.2%) and a significantly higher median ESR in patients without VA involvement (62 vs. 46 mm/h; p = 0.012). MRI and/or CT showed vertebrobasilar stroke at GCA diagnosis in 11 cases. 67/77 patients (87.0%) received high-dose intravenous glucocorticosteroids (GCs) at diagnosis, followed by oral tapering. Six patients were treated with methotrexate (MTX), one with rituximab, and five with tocilizumab (TCZ). 2/5 TCZ patients achieved clinical remission after 1 year, vertebrobasilar stroke within the first year occurred in 2/5 patients. Diagnosis of VA involvement might be underrecognized in GCA patients. VA imaging should be performed in elderly patients with vertebrobasilar stroke presenting with GCA symptoms, not to miss GCA as the etiology of stroke. Efficacy of immunotherapies in GCA with VA affection and long-term outcomes need to be investigated further. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10331602/ /pubmed/37435161 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1188073 Text en Copyright © 2023 Prünte, Naumann, Christ, Naumann and Bayas. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Prünte, Mona Klara Ros
Naumann, Anne
Christ, Monika
Naumann, Markus
Bayas, Antonios
Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement—baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort
title Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement—baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort
title_full Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement—baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort
title_fullStr Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement—baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort
title_full_unstemmed Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement—baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort
title_short Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement—baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort
title_sort giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement—baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37435161
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1188073
work_keys_str_mv AT pruntemonaklararos giantcellarteritiswithvertebralarteryinvolvementbaselinecharacteristicsandfollowupofamonocentricpatientcohort
AT naumannanne giantcellarteritiswithvertebralarteryinvolvementbaselinecharacteristicsandfollowupofamonocentricpatientcohort
AT christmonika giantcellarteritiswithvertebralarteryinvolvementbaselinecharacteristicsandfollowupofamonocentricpatientcohort
AT naumannmarkus giantcellarteritiswithvertebralarteryinvolvementbaselinecharacteristicsandfollowupofamonocentricpatientcohort
AT bayasantonios giantcellarteritiswithvertebralarteryinvolvementbaselinecharacteristicsandfollowupofamonocentricpatientcohort