Cargando…

Identification of prognostic and driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by a bioinformatics analysis

BACKGROUND: The representative gene mutation in the prognostic groups of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is not yet known. The purpose of this study is to identify representative mutations that can help physicians better predict patient prognosis and thus develop better treatment plans. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Lifang, Ruan, Jingxiong, Zhang, Ning, Dai, Jia, Xu, Xin, Tian, Xudong, Hu, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434678
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-23-587
_version_ 1785070297109495808
author Li, Lifang
Ruan, Jingxiong
Zhang, Ning
Dai, Jia
Xu, Xin
Tian, Xudong
Hu, Jian
author_facet Li, Lifang
Ruan, Jingxiong
Zhang, Ning
Dai, Jia
Xu, Xin
Tian, Xudong
Hu, Jian
author_sort Li, Lifang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The representative gene mutation in the prognostic groups of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is not yet known. The purpose of this study is to identify representative mutations that can help physicians better predict patient prognosis and thus develop better treatment plans. METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was queried for clinical and genetic information, and individuals with AML were classified into 3 groups based on their AML Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) cytogenetic risk category. Each group’s differentially mutated genes (DMGs) were evaluated. Simultaneously, Gene Ontology (GO) function and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were used to assess the function of DMGs within the 3 distinct groups. We used the driver status and protein impact of DMGs as additional filters to narrow down the list of significant genes. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the survival features of gene mutations in these genes. RESULTS: A cohort of 197 AML patients were divided into 3 groups according to their prognostic subtype: favorable (n=38), intermediate (n=116) and poor (n=43). There were significant differences in age and tumor metastasis rates among the three groups of patients. Patients in the favorable group had the highest rate of tumor metastasis. Different prognosis groups’ DMGs were detected. The DMGs were examined for the driver and harmful mutations. We considered the DMGs that had driver and harmful mutations and that affected the survival outcomes in the prognostic groups as the key gene mutations. The group with a favorable prognosis carried specific gene mutations for KIT and WT1. The intermediate prognostic group contained mutations in the genes IDH2, NRAS, NPM1, FLT3, RUNX1, DNMT1A, and MUC16. In the group with a poor prognosis, the representative genes were KRAS, TP53, IDH1, IDH2, and DNMT3A, with TP53 mutations substantially correlated with overall patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: We performed the systemic analysis of the gene mutation in patients with AML and identified representative and driver mutations between the prognostic group. identification of representative and driver mutations between the prognostic group can help predict the prognosis of patients with AML and guide treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10331699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103316992023-07-11 Identification of prognostic and driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by a bioinformatics analysis Li, Lifang Ruan, Jingxiong Zhang, Ning Dai, Jia Xu, Xin Tian, Xudong Hu, Jian Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The representative gene mutation in the prognostic groups of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is not yet known. The purpose of this study is to identify representative mutations that can help physicians better predict patient prognosis and thus develop better treatment plans. METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was queried for clinical and genetic information, and individuals with AML were classified into 3 groups based on their AML Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) cytogenetic risk category. Each group’s differentially mutated genes (DMGs) were evaluated. Simultaneously, Gene Ontology (GO) function and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were used to assess the function of DMGs within the 3 distinct groups. We used the driver status and protein impact of DMGs as additional filters to narrow down the list of significant genes. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the survival features of gene mutations in these genes. RESULTS: A cohort of 197 AML patients were divided into 3 groups according to their prognostic subtype: favorable (n=38), intermediate (n=116) and poor (n=43). There were significant differences in age and tumor metastasis rates among the three groups of patients. Patients in the favorable group had the highest rate of tumor metastasis. Different prognosis groups’ DMGs were detected. The DMGs were examined for the driver and harmful mutations. We considered the DMGs that had driver and harmful mutations and that affected the survival outcomes in the prognostic groups as the key gene mutations. The group with a favorable prognosis carried specific gene mutations for KIT and WT1. The intermediate prognostic group contained mutations in the genes IDH2, NRAS, NPM1, FLT3, RUNX1, DNMT1A, and MUC16. In the group with a poor prognosis, the representative genes were KRAS, TP53, IDH1, IDH2, and DNMT3A, with TP53 mutations substantially correlated with overall patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: We performed the systemic analysis of the gene mutation in patients with AML and identified representative and driver mutations between the prognostic group. identification of representative and driver mutations between the prognostic group can help predict the prognosis of patients with AML and guide treatment decisions. AME Publishing Company 2023-06-21 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10331699/ /pubmed/37434678 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-23-587 Text en 2023 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Lifang
Ruan, Jingxiong
Zhang, Ning
Dai, Jia
Xu, Xin
Tian, Xudong
Hu, Jian
Identification of prognostic and driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by a bioinformatics analysis
title Identification of prognostic and driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by a bioinformatics analysis
title_full Identification of prognostic and driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by a bioinformatics analysis
title_fullStr Identification of prognostic and driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by a bioinformatics analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identification of prognostic and driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by a bioinformatics analysis
title_short Identification of prognostic and driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by a bioinformatics analysis
title_sort identification of prognostic and driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia by a bioinformatics analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434678
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-23-587
work_keys_str_mv AT lilifang identificationofprognosticanddrivergenemutationsinacutemyeloidleukemiabyabioinformaticsanalysis
AT ruanjingxiong identificationofprognosticanddrivergenemutationsinacutemyeloidleukemiabyabioinformaticsanalysis
AT zhangning identificationofprognosticanddrivergenemutationsinacutemyeloidleukemiabyabioinformaticsanalysis
AT daijia identificationofprognosticanddrivergenemutationsinacutemyeloidleukemiabyabioinformaticsanalysis
AT xuxin identificationofprognosticanddrivergenemutationsinacutemyeloidleukemiabyabioinformaticsanalysis
AT tianxudong identificationofprognosticanddrivergenemutationsinacutemyeloidleukemiabyabioinformaticsanalysis
AT hujian identificationofprognosticanddrivergenemutationsinacutemyeloidleukemiabyabioinformaticsanalysis