Cargando…

A signature of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs predicts prognosis and provides basis for future anti-tumor drug development in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy worldwide and the leading culprit for women’s death. Cuproptosis is a novel and promising modality of tumor cell death and the relationship with long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) remains shrouded in a veil. Studies in cuproptosis-related lncRNA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Hao, Liu, Yanbiao, Zhang, Wenrong, Peng, Ziqi, Yu, Xinmiao, Jin, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10331703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434691
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-2702
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy worldwide and the leading culprit for women’s death. Cuproptosis is a novel and promising modality of tumor cell death and the relationship with long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) remains shrouded in a veil. Studies in cuproptosis-related lncRNAs can aid in the clinical management of breast cancer and provide a basis for anti-tumor drug development. METHODS: RNA-Seq data, somatic mutation data, and clinical information were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups according to the risk score. Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analyses were used to select prognostic lncRNAs to construct a risk score system. Its’ prognostic value was confirmed in the training and validation cohorts subsequently. Functional analysis regarding cuproptosis-related lncRNAs was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen cuproptosis-related lncRNAs were identified and 11 of them including AL023882.1, AC091588.1, AC138028.2, AC027514.1, AL592301.1, LRRC8C-DT, MFF-DT, NIFK-AS1, MECOM-AS1, OTUD6B-AS1 and RNF32-AS1 were selected for risk score system construction. The risk score was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor and patients in the high-risk group had a worse prognosis. A nomogram based on the independent prognostic factors was constructed for clinical decision aids. Further analyses revealed that patients in the high-risk group faced a heavier tumor mutational burden (TMB) and suppressed anti-tumor immunity. Besides, cuproptosis-related lncRNAs were associated with the expression of immune checkpoint inhibitors, N6-adenylate methylation (m6a), and drug sensitivity in breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic risk score system with satisfactory predictive accuracy was constructed. Besides, cuproptosis-related lncRNAs can influence the immune microenvironment, TMB, m6a, and drug sensitivity in breast cancer, which may provide a basis for future anti-tumor drug development.