Cargando…

Anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: A mini scoping review

BACKGROUND: Anxiety prediction can be used for enhancing Virtual Reality applications. We aimed to assess the evidence on whether anxiety can be accurately classified in Virtual Reality. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library as data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mevlevioğlu, Deniz, Tabirca, Sabin, Murphy, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37428748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287984
_version_ 1785070475489050624
author Mevlevioğlu, Deniz
Tabirca, Sabin
Murphy, David
author_facet Mevlevioğlu, Deniz
Tabirca, Sabin
Murphy, David
author_sort Mevlevioğlu, Deniz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anxiety prediction can be used for enhancing Virtual Reality applications. We aimed to assess the evidence on whether anxiety can be accurately classified in Virtual Reality. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library as data sources. Our search included studies from 2010 to 2022. Our inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies which take place in a Virtual Reality environment and assess the user’s anxiety using machine learning classification models and biosensors. RESULTS: 1749 records were identified and out of these, 11 (n = 237) studies were selected. Studies had varying numbers of outputs, from two outputs to eleven. Accuracy of anxiety classification for two-output models ranged from 75% to 96.4%; accuracy for three-output models ranged from 67.5% to 96.3%; accuracy for four-output models ranged from 38.8% to 86.3%. The most commonly used measures were electrodermal activity and heart rate. CONCLUSION: Results show that it is possible to create high-accuracy models to determine anxiety in real time. However, it should be noted that there is a lack of standardisation when it comes to defining ground truth for anxiety, making these results difficult to interpret. Additionally, many of these studies included small samples consisting of mostly students, which may bias the results. Future studies should be very careful in defining anxiety and aim for a more inclusive and larger sample. It is also important to research the application of the classification by conducting longitudinal studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10332625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103326252023-07-11 Anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: A mini scoping review Mevlevioğlu, Deniz Tabirca, Sabin Murphy, David PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Anxiety prediction can be used for enhancing Virtual Reality applications. We aimed to assess the evidence on whether anxiety can be accurately classified in Virtual Reality. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library as data sources. Our search included studies from 2010 to 2022. Our inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies which take place in a Virtual Reality environment and assess the user’s anxiety using machine learning classification models and biosensors. RESULTS: 1749 records were identified and out of these, 11 (n = 237) studies were selected. Studies had varying numbers of outputs, from two outputs to eleven. Accuracy of anxiety classification for two-output models ranged from 75% to 96.4%; accuracy for three-output models ranged from 67.5% to 96.3%; accuracy for four-output models ranged from 38.8% to 86.3%. The most commonly used measures were electrodermal activity and heart rate. CONCLUSION: Results show that it is possible to create high-accuracy models to determine anxiety in real time. However, it should be noted that there is a lack of standardisation when it comes to defining ground truth for anxiety, making these results difficult to interpret. Additionally, many of these studies included small samples consisting of mostly students, which may bias the results. Future studies should be very careful in defining anxiety and aim for a more inclusive and larger sample. It is also important to research the application of the classification by conducting longitudinal studies. Public Library of Science 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10332625/ /pubmed/37428748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287984 Text en © 2023 Mevlevioğlu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mevlevioğlu, Deniz
Tabirca, Sabin
Murphy, David
Anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: A mini scoping review
title Anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: A mini scoping review
title_full Anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: A mini scoping review
title_fullStr Anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: A mini scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: A mini scoping review
title_short Anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: A mini scoping review
title_sort anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: a mini scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37428748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287984
work_keys_str_mv AT mevleviogludeniz anxietyclassificationinvirtualrealityusingbiosensorsaminiscopingreview
AT tabircasabin anxietyclassificationinvirtualrealityusingbiosensorsaminiscopingreview
AT murphydavid anxietyclassificationinvirtualrealityusingbiosensorsaminiscopingreview